With the rapid growth of the market economy, ranked according to the proportion of consumption, China has become the world’s second, a lot of foreign companies increasingly value the Chinese market, and constantly improve their design philosophy and business philosophy. Throughout today’s advertising industry, it can be seen in the many excellent advertising designs, non-mainstream appearance has a high rate of non-mainstream cultural elements is a common design approach in the design of modern advertising, and more and more people sought after. In this paper, we investigate the multiple attribute decision making problems with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information. Firstly, we analyze several operations on the fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Then, we use the induced fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher correlated average (IFNIFHCA) operator to solve multiple attribute decision making with the fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information. Finally, an illustrative example for evaluating the advertisement design effects is given to verify the developed approach.
OttmanJ.A., The new rules of green marketing, strategies, tools and inspiration for sustainable branding, Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc San Francisco, CA, USA, (2011).
2.
PeattieK.J. and CraneA., Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qual Mark Res8 (2005), 357–370.
3.
HartmannP.IbáñezV.A. and SainzF.J.F., Green branding effects on attitude: Functional versus emotional positioning strategies, Mark Intell Plan23 (2005), 9–29.
4.
LeonidouC.N. and LeonidouL.C., Research into environmental marketing/management: A bibliographic analysis, Eur J Mark45 (2011), 68–103.
5.
McDonaldS.OatesC.J.AlevizouP.J.YoungC.W. and HwangK., Individual strategies for sustainable consumption, J Mark Manag28 (2012), 445–468.
6.
VogtländerJ.G.BijmaA. and BrezetH.C., Communicating the eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value model, J Clean Prod10 (2002), 57–67.
7.
KalafatisS.P.PollardM.EastR.C. and TsogasM.H., Green marketing and ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour: A cross-market examination, J Consum Mark16 (1999), 441–460.
8.
Pickett-BakerJ. and OzakiR., Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision, J Consum Mark25 (2008), 281–293.
9.
RexE. and BaumannH., Beyond ecolabels: What green marketing can learn from conventional marketing, J Clean Prod15 (2007), 567–576.
10.
MendlesonN. and PolonskyM.J., Using strategic alliances to develop credible green marketing, J Consum Mark12 (1995), 4–18.
11.
WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy hamacher power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Fundamenta Informaticae166(1) (2019), 57–85.
12.
LiG.-D.YamaguchiD. and NagaiM., A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem, Mathematical and Computer Modelling46(3-4) (2007), 573–581.
13.
WanS.-P. and DongJ.-Y., Power geometric operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Applied Soft Computing29 (2015), 153–168.
14.
WeiG.W.WeiC.WangJ.GaoH. and WeiY., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications to potential evaluation of emerging technology commercialization, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(1) (2019), 50–81.
15.
WangR.WangJ.GaoH. and WeiG., Methods for MADM with picture fuzzy muirhead mean operators and their application for evaluating the financial investment risk, Symmetry11(1) (2019), 6.
16.
WuL.WeiG.GaoH. and WeiY., Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy dombi hamy mean operators and their application for evaluating the elderly tourism service quality in tourism destination, Mathematics6(12) (2018), 294.
17.
LiuP. and TengF., An extended TODIM method for multiple attribute group decision-making based on 2-dimension uncertain linguistic Variable, Complexity, (2014).
18.
WangJ.GaoH.WeiG.W. and WeiY., Methods for multiple-attribute group decision making with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information and their applications to the selection of green suppliers, Symmetry11(1) (2019), 56.
19.
WeiG.W.GargH.GaoH. and WeiC., Interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, IEEE Access6 (2018), 67866–67884.
20.
YeJ., multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications36(2) (2009), 899–6902.
21.
WangZ.J.LiK.W. and WangW.Z., An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights, Information Sciences179(17) (2009), 3026–3040.
22.
GongZ.W.LiL.S.ZhouF.X. and YaoT.X., Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Computers & Industrial Engineering57 (2009), 1187–1193.
23.
WeiG.W. and LuM., Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems33(1) (2018), 169–186.
24.
WeiG.W., Picture uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Kybernetes46(10) (2017), 1777–1800.
25.
WeiG.W.WeiC. and GaoH., Multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued bipolar fuzzy information and their application to emerging technology commercialization evaluation, IEEE Access6 (2018), 60930–60955.
26.
WeiG.W., Some cosine similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications to strategic decision making, Informatica28(3) (2017), 547–564.
27.
LiZ.GaoH. and WeiG., Methods for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy dombi hamy mean operators, Symmetry10(11) (2018), 574.
28.
WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(4) (2017), 2119–2132.
29.
DengX.WangJ.WeiG. and LuM., Models for multiple attribute decision making with some 2-Tuple linguistic pythagorean fuzzy hamy mean operators, Mathematics6(11) (2018), 236.
30.
LiZ.WeiG. and GaoH., Methods for multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy information, Mathematics6(11) (2018), 228.
31.
AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
32.
AtanassovK., More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems33 (1989), 37–46.
33.
WeiG.W., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics41 (2011), 568–578.
36.
LinR.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems24 (2013), 879–888.
37.
WangZ.J.LiK.W. and WangW.Z., An approach to multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights, Information Sciences179 (2009), 3026–3040.
38.
WeiG.W.LinR. and WangH.J., Distance and similarity measures for hesitant interval-valued fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(1) (2014), 19–36.
39.
WeiG.W.ZhaoX.F. and LinR., Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems46 (2013), 43–53.
40.
WangZ.J.LiK.W. and XuJ.H., A mathematical programming approach to multi-attribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessment information, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 12462–12469.
41.
WeiG.W., GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting, Knowledge-Based Systems23 (2010), 243–247.
42.
WeiG.W., Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making, Applied Soft Computing10 (2010), 423–431.
43.
XuZ.S., Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems15 (2007), 285–297.
44.
XuZ.S., Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making6 (2007), 221–236.
45.
YagerR., Some aspects of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making8 (2009), 67–90.
46.
WeiG.W., Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 11671–11677.
47.
WeiG.W.WangH.J. and LinR., Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information, Knowledge and Information Systems26 (2011), 337–349.
48.
LiuF. and YuanX.H., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy set, Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics21(1) (2007), 88–91.
49.
WangX.F., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy arithmetic aggregation operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems10(2) (2008), 104–111.
50.
WangX.F., Fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to decision making, Control and Decision23(6) (2008), 607–612.
51.
HamacharH., Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer Aussagen undderen Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione, in: Progress in Cybernatics and systems research, Trappl, Klir, Riccardi, eds, 3 Hemisphere, Washington DC, (1978), 276–288.
52.
RoychowdhuryS. and WangB.H., On generalized Hamacher families of triangular operators, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning19 (1998), 419–439.
53.
WeiG.W. and LuM., Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent Systems, (2017). DOI: 10.1515/jisys-2017-0106.
54.
LuM.WeiG.W.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 1105–1117.
55.
WuS.J. and WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems21(3) (2017), 189–201.
56.
ZhouL.Y.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2689–2699.
57.
ZhouS.H. and ChangW.B., Approach to multiple attribute decision making based on the Hamacher operation with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(3) (2014), 1087–1094.
58.
WangY.J. and YuS.S., Model for evaluating the rural landscape design schemes with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems31(3) (2016), 1669–1678.
59.
ZengZ., Model for evaluating the technological innovation capability in high-tech enterprises with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33(4) (2017), 2085–2094.
60.
YagerR.R., Induced aggregation operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems137 (2003), 59–69.
61.
XuZ.S., Additive intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on fuzzy measure. international journal of uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems24(1) (2016), 1–12.
62.
WeiG.W., Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(3) (2017), 1881–1893.
63.
WeiG.W., Picture 2-Tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Fuzzy System19(4) (2017), 997–1010.
64.
JiangY.TangY.ChenQ.LiuH. and TangJ., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and their properties, Computers & Mathematics with Applications60(3) (2010), 906–918.
65.
YangY.TanX. and MengC.C., The multi-fuzzy soft set and its application in decision making, Applied Mathematical Modelling37(7) (2013), 4915–4923.
66.
LiZ.WeiG. and LuM., Pythagorean fuzzy hamy mean operators in multiple attribute group decision making and their application to supplier selection, Symmetry10(10) (2018), 505.
67.
WangJ.WeiG. and LuM., An extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making with triangular fuzzy neutrosophic numbers, Symmetry10(10) (2018), 497.
68.
MiguelL.D.BustinceH.FernándezJ.InduráinE.KolesárováA. and MesiarR., Construction of admissible linear orders for interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets with an application to decision making, Information Fusion27 (2016), 189–197.
WangJ.WeiG. and GaoH., Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued 2-Tuple linguistic pythagorean fuzzy information, Mathematics6(10) (2018), 201.
71.
OuyangY. and PedryczW., A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making, European Journal of Operational Research249(2) (2016), 677–682.
72.
WeiG.W. and WangJ.M., A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and data envelopment analysis with imprecise data, Expert Systems with Applications81 (2017), 28–38.
73.
DengX.M.WeiG.W.GaoH. and WangJ., Models for safety assessment of construction project with some 2-Tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators, IEEE Access6 (2018), 52105–52137.
74.
WangH. and XuZ.S., Multi-groups decision making using intuitionistic-valued hesitant fuzzy information, Int J Computational Intelligence Systems9(3) (2016), 468–482.
75.
WeiG.W.ChenJ. and WangJ.M., Stochastic efficiency analysis with a reliability consideration, Omega48 (2014), 1–9.
76.
HamacharH., Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer aussagen undderen zugenhorige bewertungsfunktione, in: Progress in Cybernatics and Systems Research, Trappl, Klir, Riccardi, eds, 3 Hemisphere, Washington DC, (1978), 276–288.
77.
RoychowdhuryS. and WangB.H., On generalized Hamacher families of triangular operators, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning19 (1998), 419–439.
78.
WeiG.W.WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Decision Support Systems55(3) (2013), 679–684.
79.
GomesL.F.A.M. and LimaM.M.P.P., TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences16(4) (1992), 113–127.
