Perceived brand personality of an individual may vary with various factors attached to individuals. This study intends to explore the influence of biological sex and gender roles of consumers on their perception of brand personalities. Data were collected through questionnaire survey. Four hundred and eleven valid responses were received on various brands of cell phones, out of which 281 responses on four brands were analyzed using structural equation modelling in AMOS 20. This study finds no evidence of any association of individuals’ biological sex with their perception of brand personality regarding the brand. On contrary it was found that irrespective of biological sex, individuals having certain gender roles can be associated with their perceived brand personality. The findings may not be helpful to low end products where customization of products or sales strategy may not be feasible. The findings will help in sales and marketing management of products and services. This may be very much helpful for high-end products, where customization of individual need can be accommodated. This study identifies how social constructs such as gender roles play a crucial role in redefining marketing as well as sales strategy, leading to better management of potential consumers.
BanduraA. and WaltersR.H., Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977.
2.
AbeleA.E., The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85 (2003), 768–776.
3.
GuèvremontA. and GrohmannB., The impact of brand personality on consumer responses to persuasion attempts, Journal of Brand Management20 (2013), 518–530.
4.
EaglyA.H. and SteffenV.J., Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46 (1984), 735–754.
5.
EaglyA.H., Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
6.
EaglyA.H. and KarauS.J., Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60 (1991), 685–710.
7.
JoyA. and SherryJ.F., Jr, Speaking of art as embodied imagination: A multisensory approach to understanding aesthetic experience, Journal of Consumer Research3 (2003), 259–282.
8.
BeutelA.M. and MariniM.M., Gender and values, American Sociological Review60 (1995), 436–448.
9.
OakleyA., Sex, Gender and Society, London, Temple Smith, 1972.
10.
BarkA.S.H.EscartinJ. and Van DickR., Gender and leadership in Spain: A systematic review of some key aspects, Sex Roles70 (2014), 522–537.
11.
GrohmannB., Gender dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research46 (2009), 105–119.
12.
CarrC.L., Tomboyism or lesbianism? Beyond sex/gender/ sexual conflation, Sex Roles53 (2005), 119–131.
13.
SuarD. and GochhayatJ., Influence of biological sex and gender roles on ethicality, Journal of Business Ethics134 (2016), 199–208.
14.
HirschmanE.C., Metaphor in the marketplace, Marketing Theory7 (2007), 227–248.
15.
FischerE. and ArnoldS.J., Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer behavior, Psychology and Marketing11 (1994), 163–182.
16.
GrubbE.L. and GrathwohlH.L., Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach, Journal of Marketing31 (1967), 22–27.
17.
MartinezE. and PinaJ.M., The negative impact of brand extensions on parent brand image, Journal of Product and Brand Management12 (2003), 432–448.
18.
HerdtG., Third Sex, Third Gender–Beyond Sexual Dimorphism in Culture and History, Newyork, Zone Books, 1996.
19.
PowellG.N. and GravesL.M., Women and Men in Management, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 2003.
20.
GochhayatJ.GiriV.N. and SuarD., Influence of organizational culture on organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of organizational communication, Global Business Review18(3) (2017), 691–702.
21.
O’neilJ.M.GoodG.E. and HolmesS., Fifteen Years of Theory and Research on Men’s Gender Role Conflict: New Paradigms for Empirical Research, York, NY, Basic Books, 1995.
22.
TwengeJ.M., Changes in women’s assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931–1993, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81 (2001), 133.
23.
PryzgodaJ. and ChrislerJ.C., Definitions of gender and sex: The subtleties of meaning, Sex Roles43 (2000), 553–569.
24.
AakerJ.L., Dimensions of brand personality, Journal of Marketing Research (1997), 347–356.
25.
SpenceJ.T. and HelmreichR.L., Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, London, UK, University of Texas Press, 1978.
26.
DeauxK., Sex and gender, Annual Review of Psychology36 (1985), 49–81.
27.
KellerK.L., Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity, The Journal of Marketing51 (1993), 1–22.
28.
KellerK.L.ParameswaranM. and JacobI., Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, USA, Pearson Education India, 2013.
29.
SandstromK.L.LivelyK.J.MartinD.D. and FineG.A., Symbols, Selves, and Social Life: A Symbolic Inter actionist Approach to Social Psychology and Sociology, Los Angeles, CA, Roxbury, 2006.
30.
CowartK.O.FoxandG.L. and WilsonA.E., A structural look at consumer innovativeness and self-congruence in new product purchases, Psychology and Marketing25 (2002), 1111–1130.
31.
KohlbergL., A Cognitive-Developmental Analysis of Children’s Sex-Role Concepts and Attitudes, Stanford, C A: Stanford University Press, 1966.
32.
KongsompongK., Cultural diversities between Singapore and Australia: An analysis on consumption behavior, Journal of American Academy of Business9 (2006), 87–92.
33.
HeilmanM.E., Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model, Research in Organizational Behavior5 (1983), 269–298.
34.
EisendM. and StokburgersauerN.E., brand personality: A meta-analytic review of antecedents and consequences, Marketing Letters24 (2013), 205–216.
35.
HultmanM.SkarmeasD.OghaziP. and BeheshtiH.M., Achieving tourist loyalty through destination personality, satisfaction, and identification, Journal of Business Research68 (2015), 2227–2231.
36.
GeuensM.WeijtersB. and De WulfK., A new measure of brand personality, International Journal of Research in Marketing26 (2009), 97–107.
37.
SupphellenM., Understanding core brand equity: Guidelines for in-depth elicitation of brand associations, International Journal of Market Research42 (2000), 319–338.
38.
RajputN.KesharwaniS. and KhannaA., Dynamics of female buying behaviour: A study of branded apparels in India, International Journal of Marketing Studies4 (2012), 121–129.
39.
BourdieuP., La Domination Masculine, Paris, Le Seuil, 1998.
40.
GordonR.ZainuddinN. and MageeC., Unlocking the potential of branding in social marketing services: Utilising brand personality and brand personality appeal, Journal of Services Marketing30 (2016), 48–62.
41.
RajagopalR., Consumer culture and purchase intentions toward fashion apparel in Mexico, Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management18 (2018), 286–307.
42.
BornaS. and WhiteG., “Sex” and “Gender”: Two confused and confusing concepts in the “Women in Corporate Management” literature, Journal of Business Ethics47 (2003), 89–99.
43.
GuthrieS.E. and GuthrieS., Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion, Oxford University Press On Demand, 1993.
44.
FournierS. and MickD.G., Rediscovering satisfaction, The Journal of Marketing63 (1999), 5–23.
45.
FreudS., Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, New York, Avon, 1962.
46.
AzarS.L., Exploring brand masculine patterns: Moving beyond monolithic masculinity, Journal of Product and Brand Management22 (2003), 502–512.
47.
BemS.L., The measurement of psychological androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42 (1974), 155–62.
48.
BemS.L., Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing, Psychological Review88 (1981), 354–364.
49.
BemS.L., Androgyny and Gender Schema Theory: A Conceptual and Empirical Integration, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1985, pp. 179–226..
50.
BemS.L., The Lenses of Gender: Transforming The Debate on Sexual Inequality, Newhaven, Ct, Yale University Press, 1993.
51.
MuellerS.L. and Dato-OnM.C., A cross cultural study of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial self-efficacy, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal9 (2013), 1–20.
52.
MolinilloS.JaputraA.NguyenB. and ChenC.H.S., Responsible Brands vs active brands? An examination of brand personality on brand awareness, brand trust, and brand loyalty, Marketing Intelligence and Planning35(2) (2017), 166–179.
53.
HanbyT., Brands-dead or alive? International Journal of Market Research41 (1999), 7.
54.
ScheinV.E., A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management, Journal of Social Issues57 (2001), 675–688.
55.
GuptaV.K. and BhaweN.M., The influence of proactive personality and stereotype threat on women’s entrepreneurial intentions, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies13 (2007), 73–85.
56.
WoodW. and EaglyA.H., A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences, Psychological Bulletin128 (2002), 699–727.
