Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Mobility awareness and energy efficiency have been considered as the two irreplaceable enhancement issues in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) where nodes navigate erratically toward any path with limited battery life, bringing about incessant change in topology. These constraints are generally concentrated to build the lifetime of such systems. The research work proposes Clustering with Chicken swarm based Energy Efficient (CCEE) algorithm to take care of the advanced issues for useful dynamic data transmission alongside Adaptive Position Update based Geographic Routing (APUGR) protocol. The race of cluster heads deals with mobility and remaining vitality and additionally, the level of availability for choosing nodes to fill in as cluster head set out toward longer duration of time. The cluster formation is exhibited by taking multi-objective fitness work utilizing chicken swarm enhancement. APUGR progressively changes the frequency of position refreshes, in light of the mobility dynamics of the nodes and the sending designs in the system. It depends on two basic standards: (i) nodes whose developments are harder to foresee refresh their positions all the more as often as possible and the other way round, (ii) nodes nearer to broadcasting ways refresh their positions all the more oftentimes and the other way round. In light of this routing, the data transmission from source to end user is extremely viable. The recreation comes about to demonstrate that the execution of CCEE achieves preferred outcomes, which are analyzed over existing energy efficient algorithms plot as far as load balancing factor, throughput, inter packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay and power consumption by using NS2 simulations.

Keywords

Adhoc network load balancing mobility energy consumption Clustering based Energy Efficient (CCEE)Adaptive Position Update based Geographic Routing (APUGR)chicken swarm optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Karp

and Kung

H.T.

, GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks, in: Proc. ACM MobiCom (2000), 243–254.

Muthusenthil

and Murugavalli

, Privacy preservation and protection for cluster based geographic routing protocol in MANET, Wireless Networks 23(1) (2017), 79–87.

Chou

C.H.

Ssu

K.F.

and Jiau

H.C.

, Geographic forwarding with dead-end reduction in mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 57(4) (2008), 2375–2386.

Nallusamy

and Sabari

, Optimized Memetic and PSO Algorithm for Efficient Geographic Routing in MANET, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 116(24) (2017), 293–314.

Perkins

Belding-Royer

and Das

, Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF RFC 3561 (2003).

Rajan

Geetha

Rasi Priya

and Sasikala

, Investigation on bio-inspired population based meta heuristic algorithms for optimization problems in ad hoc networks, International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Physical, Electrical and Computer Engineering 9(3) (2015).

Bokhari

D.M.

Hamatta

H.S.A.

and Siddigui

S.T.

, A review of clustering algorithms as applied in MANETs, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research 2 (2012), 364–369.

Torrieri

Talarico

and Valenti

M.C.

, Performance comparisons of geographic routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Transactions on Communications 63(11), (2015), 4276–4286.

Kuhn

Wattenhofer

and Zollinger

, An algorithmic approach to geographic routing in ad hoc and sensor networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 16(1) (2008), 51–62.

10.

Blazevic

Giordano

and LeBoudec

J.-Y.

, A Location Based Routing Method for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing 4(2) (2005), 97–110.

11.

Aissa

and Belghith

, A node quality based clustering algorithm in wireless mobile AdHoc networks, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT ’14), 32 (2014), 174–181.

12.

Omar

Hedjaz

Rebouh

Aouchar

Abbache

and Tari

, On-demand source routing with reduced packets protocol in mobile ad-hoc networks, AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 69(10), (2015), 429–1436.

13.

Arad

and Shavitt

, Minimizing recovery state in geographic ad hoc routing, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 8(2) (2009), 203–217.

14.

Khatoon

, Mobility Aware Energy Efficient Clustering for MANET: A Bio-Inspired Approach with Particle Swarm Optimization, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2017.

15.

Kuila

and Jana

P.K.

, Energy efficient clustering and routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks: particle swarm optimization approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 33 (2014), 127–140.

16.

Chen

Kanhere

S.S.

Hassan

and Lan

K.C.

, Adaptive Position Update in Geographic Routing, in: Proc. Int’l Conf. Comm. (ICC ’06) (2006), 4046–4051.

17.

Basagni

Conti

Giordano

and Stojmenovic

, Mobile ad hoc networking: the cutting edge directions, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hobo-ken, New Jersey (2013).

18.

Jamali

Rezaei

and Gudakahriz

S.J.

, An energy-efficient routing protocol for Manets: A particle swarm optimization approach, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 11(6) (2013), 803–812.

19.

Camp

Boleng

Williams

Wilcox

and Navidi

, Performance Comparison of Two Location Based Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks, in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2002), 1678–1687.

20.

Santhi Sri

Rajendra Prasad

and Kiran Kumar

, Arab J Sci Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-3043-8, (2018), 1–11.

21.

Project

T.V.

et al., The ns Manual (formerly ns Notes and Documentation), http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ 1(3) (2011).

22.

Preetha

and Chitra

, Clustering & Cluster Head Selection Techniques in Mobile Adhoc Networks, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering 2(7) (2014), 1.

23.

Bednarczyk

and Gajewski

, An enhanced algorithm for MANET clustering based on weighted parameters, Universal Journal of Communications and Network 1(3) (2013), 88–94.

24.

Guodong

Gang

and Jun

, ELGR: An energy-efficiency and load-balanced geographic routing algorithm for lossy mobile ad hoc networks, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 23(3) (2010), 334–340.

25.

Meng

Liu

Gao

and Zhang

, A new bio-inspired algorithm: chicken swarm optimization, in: International Conference in Swarm Intelligence, Springer International Publishing (2014), 86–94.

26.

Xiang

Wang

and Zhou

, Self-adaptive on-demand geographic routing for mobile ad hoc networks, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 11(9) (2012), 1572–1586.

27.

and Vaidya

N.H.

, Location-Aided Routing (LAR) in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, ACM/Baltzer Wireless Networks 6(4) (2002), 307–321.

CCEE: Clustering with chicken swarm based energy efficient algorithm with APUGR protocol for mobility awareness and energy saving in adhoc network

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References