Tourism industry relies on the regional development, the active regional tourism is a significant feature in the contemporary development of tourism, and it is also an important form of the rise of China’s tourism industry. Because of the enormous benefit has brought by regional tourism, the relevant stakeholders will compete with each other. In the geographical space, it is named the tourism economy of regional competitive. In reality, it has a kind of area, different actors in the region sharing the same tourism brand, and it results an unsustainable development during the tourism resources in the region. In this paper, we study on the developing performance evaluation of tourism economy with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Then, we present the dependent intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean (DIFWBM) operator, of which the related weights rely on the aggregated intuitionistic fuzzy arguments and is able to lower the effect of unfair arguments on the aggregated results and then apply DIFWBM operator to solve the developing performance evaluation of tourism economy using intuitionistic fuzzy information. In the end, an example for to estimate the developing performance of tourism economy is proposed to testify the proposed method.
WangL.ShenQ. and ZhuL., Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 23–50.
2.
ZhangW.XuY. and WangH., A consensus reaching model for 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information, Int J Systems Science47(2) (2016), 389–405.
3.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management17(4) (2016), 491–502.
4.
LiY.LiuP. and ChenY., Some single valued neutrosophic number heronian mean operators and their application in multiple attribute group decision making, Informatica Lith Acad Sci27(1) (2016), 85–110.
5.
BegI. and RashidT., Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic information in multiple attributes group decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(1) (2016), 109–116.
6.
TangY.WenL.L. and WeiG.W., Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on the generalized Dice similarity measures with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems21(2) (2017), 85–95.
7.
WeiG.W.WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Decision Support Systems55(3) (2013), 679–684.
8.
WeiG.W., Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems17(3) (2015), 484–489.
9.
LuM.WeiG.W.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 1105–1117.
10.
WeiG.W., Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics7(6) (2016), 1093–1114.
11.
FanZ.P.FengB.SunY.H. and OuW., Evaluating knowledge management capability of organizations: A fuzzy linguistic method, Expert Systems with Applications36(2) (2009), 3346–3354.
12.
WeiG.W.WangH.J.ZhaoX.F. and LinR., Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(3) (2014), 1201–1209.
13.
LuM.WeiG.W.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT. and AlsaediA., Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 1197–1207.
14.
WuJ. and LiuY., An approach for multiple attribute group decision making problems with interval-valued intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Computers & Industrial Engineering66(2) (2013), 311–324.
15.
ParkJ.H.ChoH.-J. and KwunY.C., Extension of the VIKOR method to dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Computers & Mathematics with Applications65(4) (2013), 731–744.
16.
AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
17.
AtanassovK., More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems33 (1989), 37–46.
18.
ChenS.M. and TanJ.M., Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems67(4) (1994), 163–172.
19.
HongD.H. and ChoiC.H., Multicriteria fuzzy problems based on vague set theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114(3) (2000), 103–113.
20.
BonferroniC., Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bolletino Matematica Italiana5 (1950), 267–270.
21.
ParkJ.-H.KimJ.Y. and KwunY.C., Intuitionistic fuzzy optimized weighted geometric bonferroni means and their applications in group decision making, Fundam Inform144(3–4) (2016), 363–381.
22.
HeY. and HeZ., Extensions of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy interaction Bonferroni means and their application to multiple-attribute decision making, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems24(3) (2016), 558–573.
23.
GongY.HuN.ZhangJ.LiuG. and DengJ., Multi-attribute group decision making method based on geometric Bonferroni mean operator of trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy numbers, Computers & Industrial Engineering81 (2015), 167–176.
24.
VermaR., Generalized Bonferroni mean operator for fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiattribute decision making, Int J Intell Syst30(5) (2015), 499–519.
25.
JiangX.P. and WeiG.W., Some Bonferroni mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2153–2162.
26.
WeiG.W.ZhaoX.F.LinR. and WangH.J., Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Applied Mathematical Modelling37 (2013), 5277–5285.
WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(4) (2017), 2119–2132.
29.
WeiG.W., Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(3) (2017), 1881–1893.
30.
WeiG.W., Picture 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems19(4) (2017), 997–1010.
31.
ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Some intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems37 (2013), 472–479.
32.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Some induced correlated aggregating operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39(2) (2012), 2026–2034.
33.
WeiG.W., Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38(9) (2011), 11671–11677.
34.
WeiG.W.LinR. and WangH.J., Distance and similarity measures for hesitant interval-valued fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(1) (2014), 19–36.
35.
XuZ.S. and DaQ.L., An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent System18 (2003), 953–969.
36.
WangW.Z. and LiuX.W., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted averaging operator based on Einstein operation and its application to decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25(2) (2013), 279–290.
37.
ShenF.XuJ. and XuZ., An outranking sorting method for multi-criteria group decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences334–335 (2016), 338–353.
38.
CaiY. and YuJ., Engineering geological environment comprehensive evaluation with intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(5) (2015), 2705–2711.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Some dependent aggregation operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 5881–5886.
41.
WeiG.W.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic arithmetic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems13(4) (2016), 1–16.
42.
WangH.J.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(5) (2014), 2281–2290.
43.
LinR.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Models for selecting an ERP system with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(5) (2014), 2155–2165.
44.
YueZ.L., A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS, Applied Mathematical Modelling35 (2011), 1926–1936.
45.
MerigoJ.M. and CasanovasM., Decision making with distance measures and linguistic aggregation operators, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems12 (2010), 190–198.
46.
MerigoJ.M.Gil-LafuenteA.M.ZhouL.G. and ChenH.Y., Generalization of the linguistic aggregation operator and its application in decision making, Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics22 (2011), 593–603.
47.
RanL.G. and WeiG.W., Uncertain prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy21(1) (2015), 118–139.
48.
WeiG.W. and WangJ.M., A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and data envelopment analysis with imprecise data, Expert Systems with Applications81 (2017), 28–38.
49.
YueZ.L., A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS, Applied Mathematical Modelling35 (2011), 1926–1936.
50.
WeiG.W.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT. and AlsaediA., A linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis with hesitant fuzzy sets based on fuzzy measure, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems19(3) (2017), 607–614.
51.
YuX.H. and XuZ.S., Graph-based multi-agent decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning53(4) (2012), 502–512.
52.
MerigoJ.M. and CasanovasM., Induced aggregation operators in decision making with the Dempster-Shafer belief structure, International Journal of Intelligent Systems24 (2009), 934–954.
53.
LiQ.X.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Model for software quality evaluation with hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 2639–2647.
54.
ChiclanaF.HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., The ordered weighted geometric operator: Properties and application, in: Proc of 8th Int Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Madrid (2000), 985–991.
55.
ZhouL.Y.LinR.ZhaoX.F. and WeiG.W., Uncertain linguistic prioritized aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems21(4) (2013), 603–627.
56.
LinJ.ChenR.Q. and ZhangQ., Similarity-based approach for group decision making with multi-granularity linguistic information, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems24(6) (2016), 873–900.
57.
MengF.Y. and ChenX.H., An approach to uncertain linguistic multi-attribute group decision making based on interactive index, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems23(3) (2015), 319–344.
58.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 713–724.
59.
OuyangY. and PedryczW., A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making, European Journal of Operational Research249(2) (2016), 677–682.
