Given the importance of working alliance to client engagement and outcomes in vocational rehabilitation, there is a need to better understand predictors of the client counselor relationship. Research has shown the tripartite efficacy model as a way of understanding working alliance in various contexts but has never been examined in vocational rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE:
This study evaluates the relationship among tripartite efficacy beliefs constructs (self-efficacy, other-efficacy, and relation-inferred self-efficacy [RISE]), working alliance, and engagement for 350 clients receiving state vocational rehabilitation services.
METHODS:
Researchers used a path analysis to assess the hypothesis that the tripartite efficacy model would predict client engagement through its impact on working alliance.
RESULTS:
The hypothesized model had a close fit. Other-efficacy and RISE beliefs had significant positive direct effects on working alliance and indirect effects on client engagement. Self-efficacy had a significant negative direct effect on working alliance and client engagement.
CONCLUSIONS:
The study supports the tripartite efficacy beliefs model as a way of better understanding client perceptions of working alliance in vocational rehabilitation.
AndersénÅ., Larsson,K., Pingel,R., Kristiansson,P., & AnderzénI. (2018). The relationship between self-efficacy and transition to work or studies in young adults with disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 46(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494817717556
Bandura,A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of selfefficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
4.
Blau,G. J. (1994). Testing a two-dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59(2), 288–312. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1061
5.
Castonguay,L. G., Constantino,M. J., Boswell,J.F., & Kraus,D. R.. (2011). The therapeutic alliance: Research and theory. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 684–702). Wiley.
6.
ChanF., McMahonB. T., ShawL. R., & LeeG. (2004). Psychometric validation of the Expectations About Rehabilitation Counseling Scale: A preliminary study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20(2), 127–133.
7.
Chan,F., Shaw,L. R., McMahon,B. T., Koch,L., & Strauser,D. (1997). A model for enhancing consumer-counselor working relationships in rehabilitation: A theoretical and conceptual framework. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41, 122–137.
8.
Chan,F., Tansey,T. N., Chronister,J., McMahon,B. T., Iwanaga,K., Wu,J. R., Chen,X., Lee,B., Bengtson,K., Umucu,E., Flowers,S., & Moser,E. (2017). Rehabilitation counseling practice in state vocational rehabilitation and the effect of the workforce innovation and opportunity act (WIOA). Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 48(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1891/0047-2220.48.3.20
9.
Corrigan,P. W., Angell,B., Davidson,L., Marcus,S. C., Salzer,M. S., Kottsieper,P., Larson,J. E., Mahoney,C. A., O’Connell,M. J., & Stanhope,V. (2012). From adherence to selfdetermination: Evolution of a treatment paradigm for people with serious mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 63(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201100065
10.
Cote,S., Saks,A. M., & Zikic,J. (2006). Trait affect and job search outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.001
11.
Donnell,C. M., Lustig,D. C., & Strauser,D. R. (2004). The working alliance: Rehabilitation outcomes for persons with severe mental illness. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(2), 12–18.
12.
Dutta,A., Chan,F., Kundu,M. M., Kaya,C., Brooks,J., Sánchez,J, & Tansey,T. N. (2017). Assessing vocational rehabilitation engagement of people with disabilities: A factor-analytic approach. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 60(3), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355215626698
13.
Horvath,A. O., Del Re,A. C., Flückiger,C., & Symonds,D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1),9–16. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1037/a0022186
14.
Horvath,A. O., & Symonds,B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology; Washington, D.C., 38(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139
15.
Hu,L. T., & Bentler,P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
16.
Iwanaga,K., Chan,F., Tansey,T. N., Strauser,D., Ritter,E., Bishop,M., & Brooks,J. (2019). Working alliance and stages of change for employment: The intermediary role of autonomous motivation, outcome expectancy and vocational rehabilitation engagement. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 29, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9787-5
17.
Jackson,B., Dimmock,J. A., Taylor,I. M., & Hagger,M. S. (2012). The tripartite efficacy framework in client–therapist rehabilitation interactions: Implications for relationship quality and client engagement. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57(4), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030062
18.
Jackson,B., Knapp,P., & Beauchamp,M. R. (2008). Origins and consequences of tripartite efficacy beliefs within elite athlete dyads. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 512–540. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.5.512
19.
Kosciulek,J. F. (2004). Vocational rehabilitation counseling. American Rehabilitation, 28(1), 40–47.
20.
Lambert,M. J., & Barley,D. E. (2002). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 357–361. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357.
21.
Banker,C. C., & Leary,M. R. (2020). Hypo-egoic nonentitlement as a feature of humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(5), 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219875144
22.
Lent,R. W. (2016). Self-efficacy in a relational world: Social cognitive mechanisms of adaptation and development. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(4), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016638742
23.
Lent,R. W., Brown,S. D., & Hackett,G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career Choice and Development, (pp. 255–311). Jossey-Bass.
24.
Lent,R. W, & Lopez, F. G. (2002). Cognitive ties that bind: A tripartite view of efficacy beliefs in growth-promoting relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, pp. 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.21.3.256.22535
25.
Lustig,D., Strauser,D., Rice,N., & Rucker,T. (2002). The relationship between working alliance and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552020460010201
26.
Lustig,D., Strauser,D., & Weems,G. (2004). Rehabilitation service patterns: A rural/urban comparison of success factors. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(3), 13–19.
27.
Marsh,H. W., Hau,K. T., & Wen,Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
28.
Martin,D. J., Garske,J. P., & Davis,M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 438–450. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438
29.
Maxwell,S. E., & Cole,D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
Morrison,M. A., & Lent,R. W. (2014). The advisory working alliance and research training: Test of a relational efficacy model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(4), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000030
32.
Morrison,M. A., & Lent,R. W. (2018). The working alliance, beliefs about the supervisor, and counseling self-efficacy: Applying the relational efficacy model to counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(4), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000267
33.
Munder,T., Wilmers,F., Leonhart,R., Linster,H. W., & Barth,J. (2010). Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR): Psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.658
34.
Phillips,B. N., Reyes,A., Kriofske Mainella,A. M., Kesselmayer,R. F., & Jacobson,J. D. (2018). A needs driven model of workplace social effectiveness in adults with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 62(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355217747690
35.
Rosseel,Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.
36.
Safran,J. D, & Muran,J. C. (1995). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.447
37.
Saks,A. M., & Ashforth,B. E. (1999). Effects of individual differences and job search behaviors on the employment status of recent university graduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(2), 355–349. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1665
38.
Saks,A. M., ZikicJ., & Koen,J. (2015). Job search self-efficacy: Reconceptualizing the construct and its measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.007
39.
Saville,P. D., & Bray,S. R. (2016). Athletes’ perceptions of coaching behavior, relation-inferred self-efficacy (RISE), and self efficacy in youth sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2015.1052890
40.
Saville,P. D., Bray,S. R., Ginis,K. A. M., Cairney,J., Marinoff-Shupe,D., & Pettit,A. (2014). Sources of self-efficacy and coach/instructor behaviors underlying relation-inferred self efficacy (RISE) in recreational youth sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0144
41.
Schelat,R. (2001). The predictive capacity of the working alliance in vocational rehabilitation outcomes. Dissertation Abstract, 61((7-B)), 3553.
42.
Shaw,L. R., McMahon,B. T., Chan,F., & Hannold,E. (2004). Enhancement of the working alliance: A training program to align counselor and consumer expectations. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 107–126.
43.
Strauser,D. R., Lustig,D. C., & Donnell,C. (2004). The relationship between working alliance and therapeutic outcomes for individuals with mild mental retardation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 47(4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552040470040301
44.
Strauser,D. R., Lustig,D. C., Chan,F., & O’Sullivan,D. (2010). Working alliance and vocational outcomes for cancer survivors: An initial analysis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 33(3), 271–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833638e3
45.
Tansey,T. N., Iwanaga,K., Bezyak,J., & Ditchman,N. (2017). Testing an integrated self-determined work motivation model for people with disabilities: A path analysis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(4), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000141
