Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Research shows counselors with a master’s degree in rehabilitation counseling (MRC) do not have different closure rates than counselors with other master’s (OM) degrees that are in rehabilitation-related disciplines.

OBJECTIVE:

To explore reasons for the lack of differences by comparing MRC and OM counselors on amount of pre-service training in job-related areas (Aim 1), perceptions of preparedness for work (Aim 2), time spent performing job-related activities (Aim 3), and through open-ended responses regarding education and work environment (Aim 4).

METHODS:

Counselors (53 MRC, 27 OM) completed an online survey assessing pre-service training, perceptions of preparedness, and time spent preforming job-related activities.

RESULTS:

Aim 1: MRC counselors reported more training in five areas (p-values < 0.001), but not in nine others. Aim 2: MRC counselors felt more prepared for their jobs (p = 0.001). Aim 3: No differences were found regarding time spent performing job-related activities. Aim 4: Responses suggested similar closure rates might stem from high administrative work strain, low client motivation, unavailability of jobs, impact of on-the-job experience, and closure quota demands.

CONCLUSIONS:

MRC-OM closure rate similarities are not due to inadequate MRC training, low feelings of preparedness for work, or MRC-OM differences in job-related activities; in fact, they may be due to factors unrelated to a counselor’s education.

Keywords

Rehabilitation counseling closure rate counselor education policy and training vocational rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams, J. M. & Tucker, C. M. (1989). Counselor variables that predict job performance among state-employed vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Education, 3, 193–199.

Bordin, H. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In Horvath

and Greenberg

(Eds.), The Working Alliance: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 13–37). New York:John Wiley and Sons.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (2017). CRC Certification Guide. Schaumburg, IL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.bsp.brain.riken.jp/ICALAB/nmflab

Cook, D. W., & Bolton, B. (1992). Rehabilitation counselor education and case performance: An independent replication. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 36, 37–43.

Council for Accreditation of Counseling & Related Educational Programs. (2017). CACREP Directory. Retrieved January 01, 2018, from http://www.cacrep.org/directory/

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Donnell, C. M., Lustig, D. C., & Strauser

D. R.

(2004). The working alliance: Rehabilitation outcomes for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(2), 12–18.

Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll. (4th ed.) Los Angeles:Sage.

10.

Friborg, O., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2013). A comparison of open-ended and closed questions in the prediction of mental health. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 47, 1397–1411.

11.

Grice, J., & Iwasaki, M. (2007). A truly multivariate approach to MANOVA. Applied Multivariate Research, 12, 199–226.

12.

Leahy, M., Chan, F., & Saunders, J. (2003). Job functions and knowledge requirements of certified rehabilitation counselors in the 21st century. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46(2), 66–128.

13.

Leahy, M. J., Chan, F., Sung, C., & Kim, M. (2012). Empirically derived test specifications for the Certified Rehabilitation Counselor Examination. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 56(4), 199–214.

14.

Leahy, M. J., Syzmanski, E. M., & Linkowski, D. C. (1993). Knowledge importance in rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37(2), 130–145.

15.

Lustig, D., Strauser, D., Rice, N., & Rucker, T. (2002). Therelation-ship between working alliance and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46(1), 25–63.

16.

Plotner, A. J., Trach, J. S., & Strauser, D. R. (2012). Vocational rehabilitation counselors’ identified transition competencies: Perceived importance, frequency, and preparedness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(3), 135–143.

17.

Rehabilitation Services Administration (2017). Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/rsa/index.html.

18.

Szymanski, E. M. (1991). Relationship of level of rehabilitation counselor education to rehabilitation client outcome in the Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 35(1), 23–37.

19.

Szymanski, E. M., & Danek, M. (1992). The relationship of rehabilitation counselor education to rehabilitation client outcome: A replication and extension. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58(1), 49–56.

20.

Syzmanski, E. M., Leahy, M. J., & Linkowski, D. C. (1993). Reported preparedness of certified counselors in rehabilitation counseling knowledge areas. Journal Of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 24(4), 46–57.

21.

Szymanski, E. M., & Parker, R. M. (1989a). Relationship of rehabilitation client outcome to level of rehabilitation counselor education. Journal of Rehabilitation, 55, 32–36.

22.

Szymanski, E. M., & Parker, R. M. (1989b). Competitive closure rate of rehabilitation clients with severe disabilities as a function of counselor education and experience. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 32, 292–299.

23.

Wheaton, J. E., & Berven, N. L. (1994). Education, experience, and caseload management practices of counselors in a state vocational rehabilitation agency. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 38(1), 44–5.

24.

Zanskas, S., & Strohmer, D. C. (2010). Rehabilitation counselor work environment: Examining congruence with prototypic work personality. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53, 143–152.

Closure rates and counselor education: An exploration of why counselors with MRC degrees do not have better client outcomes than other master’s-level counselors