Paraprofessionals play an integral role in educating students with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Students with ASD have unique learning characteristics which require specialized knowledge and skills in order to support them effectively in schools. However, paraprofessionals often do not receive the training needed to support this student population.
OBJECTIVE:
Delivering effective professional development to paraprofessionals is essential to the success of these students.
METHODS:
A model for delivering online professional development to paraprofessionals on a statewide level was implemented and evaluated.
RESULTS:
The evaluation concentrated on whether the online course changed the perceived knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practices and the attitudes of paraprofessionals toward students with ASD.
CONCLUSION:
Additionally, the existence of a relationship between occupational characteristics and participants’ reported knowledge was explored.
AdolphsonS. L., HawkenL. S., & CarrollM. S. (2010). Supporting students with disabilities in the general education classroom: The behavioral health assistant. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(4), 236–244. doi:10.1177/1098300709340701
2.
AzadG. F., LockeJ., DowneyM. M., XieM., & MandellD. S. (2015). One-to-one assistant engagement in autism support classrooms. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(4), 337–346. doi:10.1177/0888406415603208
3.
BinghamM. A., SpoonerF., & BrowderD. (2007). Training parareducators to promote the use of augmentative and alternative communication by students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(3), 339–352.
4.
BittermanA., GrayL., & GoldringR. (2013). Characteristics of public and private and elementary and secondary schools in the United States: Results from the 2011-2012 Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES Publication No. 2013-312). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
5.
BretonW. (2010). Special education paraprofessionals: Perceptions of preservice preparation supervision, and ongoing developmental training. International Journal of SpecialEducation, 25(1), 34–45.
6.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. Advance online publication. The Journal of Special Education. doi:10.1177/0022466913501882
7.
BrowderD. M., WoodL., ThompsonJ., & RibuffoC. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC-3). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
8.
BrownJ. A., WoodsJ. J. (2012). Evaluation of a multicomponent online communication professional development program for early interventionists. Journal of Early Intervention, 34(4), 222–242.
9.
CarterE., O’RourkeL., SiscoL. G., & PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344–359.
10.
Causton-TheoharisJ. N.MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71(4), 431–444.
11.
ChenD., KleinM. D., & MinorL. (2009). Interdisciplinary perspectives in early intervention: Professional development in multiple disabilities through distance education. Infants & Young Children, 22, 146–158.
12.
FisherM., & PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33(5), 287–297.
13.
GhereG., & York-BarrJ. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28(1), 21–32.
14.
GiangrecoM. F., BroerS. M., & EdelmanS. W. (2002). That was then, this is now!” Paraprofessional supports for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptionality, 10(1), 47–64. doi:10.1207/S15327035EX1001_4
15.
GiangrecoM. F., DoyleM. B., & SuterJ. C. (2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 362–373.
16.
GiangrecoM. F., EdelmanS. W., & BroerS. M. (2003). Schoolwide planning to improve paraeducator supports. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 63–78.
17.
GiangrecoM. F., HalvorsenA., DoyleM. B., & BroerS. M. (2004). Alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals in inclusive schools. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 17, 82–90.
18.
GiangrecoM. F., SuterJ. C., & DoyleM. B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41–57. doi:10.1080/10474410903535356
19.
GilliganK. T., & LuiselliJ. K., PaceG. M. (2007). Training paraprofessional staff to implement discrete trial instruction: Evaluation of a practical performance feedback intervention. The Behavior Therapist, 30(3), 63–66.
20.
HallL. J., GrundonG. S., & PopeC., RomeroA. B. (2010). Training paraprofessionals to use behoral strategies when educating learners with autism spectrum disorders across environments. Behavioral Interventions, 25, 37–51.
21.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 34 CFR §300.156 (2004). Available at http://www.ed.gov/
22.
KatsiyannisA., HodgeJ., & LangfordA. (2000). Paraeducators: Legal and practice considerations. Remedial & Special Education, 21(5), 297–304. doi:10.1177/074193250002100506
23.
KoegelR. L., KimS., & KoegelL. K. (2014). Training paraprofessionals to improve socialization in students with ASD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2094-x
24.
McCullochE. B., NoonanM. J. (2013). Impact of online training videos on the implementation of mand training by three elementary school paraprofessionals. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 132–141.
25.
McDonnellJ., JohnsonJ. W., PolychronisS., & RisenT. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(4), 363–377.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2007). Description and employment criteria for instructional paraprofessionals. Retrieved from http://nces.edu.gov/pubs2007/2007008.pdf.
27.
National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics, 2010 (NCES 2011-015), (Chapter 2). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64.
28.
OdomS. L., Collet-KlingenbergL., RogersS. J., & HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Youth, 54(4), 275–282. doi:10.1080/10459881003785506
29.
QuiltyK. (2007). Teaching paraprofessionals how to write and implement social stories for students with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 182–189. doi:10.1077/07419325070280030701
30.
SimpsonR. L. (2005). Evidence-based practices and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(3), 140–149.
31.
Students with autism spectrum disorder; training required of personnel. Virginia Code §22.1-298.3. (2012).
32.
SuterJ. C., GiangrecoM. F. (2008). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education OnlineFirst–doi:10.1177/002246690731353
33.
TarryE., CoxA. (2014). Professional development in international schools; issues of inclusion identified by a group of international school teaching assistants. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 14(4), 248–254doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12024
