PURPOSE: To present the findings of World Café focused community conversations organized to identify existing and needed resources for transition age youth with disabilities.
DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive research design.
PARTICIPANTS: 52 professionals, parents, and students with disabilities with knowledge of transition services for youth with disabilities residing in a medium size city in the southern U.S.
RESULTS: The results identified five important areas of service for transition age youth with disabilities. They are (a) demand side focused vocational rehabilitation services, (b) transition services for building employment skills, (c) connecting existing community based resources, (d) advocacy services, and (e) parent and family involvement in transition.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the usefulness of community conversations in encouraging participants to think critically and in generating action plans to address a social exigency. In the process this study re-established the need for further investigation of the potential of community conversations to address key challenges facing diverse populations with disabilities, their families and communities, service providers, educators, researchers, and policy makers.
BernauerJ. A., LichtmanM., JacobsC., & RobertsonS. (2013). Blending the old and the new: Qualitative data analysis as critical thinking and using Nvivo with a generic approach. The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–10.
2.
BerryH. G., & CaplanL. J. (2010). Employment and earnings growth among transition-age supplemental security income program participants. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(3), 152–159.
3.
BrownJ., & IsaacsD. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations thatmatter. San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Koehler.
4.
BurchardtT. (2004). Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the socialmodel of disability. Disability & Society, 19(1), 735–751.
5.
CampbellC., NhamoM., ScottK., MadanhireC., NyamukapaC., SkovdalM., & GregsonS. (2013). The role of community conversations in facilitating local HIV competence: Case study from rural Zimbabwe. BioMed Central Public Health, 13, 354–368.
6.
CarterE. W., SwedeenB., & MossC. K. (2012). Engaging youth with and without significant disabilities in inclusive service experiences. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(5), 46–54.
7.
CreswellJ. W., & CreswellJ. W. (2013), Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
8.
FoggN. P., HarringtonP. E., & McMahonB. T. (2010). The impact of the Great Recessionupon the unemployment of Americans with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 33(3), 193–202.
9.
FrakerT. M., BlackA., BroadusJ., MamunA., MannoM., MartinezJ., ... ReedD. (2011). The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects Interim Report on the City University of New York’s Project. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1849506 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1849506.
10.
HoneycuttT., ThompkinsA., BardonsM., & SternS. (2013), State differences in the vocational rehabilitation experiences of transition-age youth with disabilities. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
11.
HoneycuttT., & WittenburgD. (2012). Identifying transition-age youth with disabilities using existing surveys. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
12.
HydeC. A., &
MeyerM. (2010). Does attitudinal consensus lead to neighborhood collaboration? An exploratory analysis of an urban community?Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20, 56–73. doi:
10.1080/10911350903126932
13.
KayeH. S. (2010). Barriers to employment for people with disabilities: Bad advice, poor health, and ineffective public policy. Disability and Health Journal, 3(2), e6.
14.
KiernanW. E., HoffD., FreezeS., & MankD. M. (2011). Employment first: A beginning notan end. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 300–304.
15.
LitchmanM. (2014), Qualitative Research for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
LoBiancoT., & KleinertH. (2013). Factors in successful post-school transitions. Research Brief. Lexington, KY: Human Development Institute, University of Kentucky.
17.
MarderC., LevineP., WagnerM., & CardosoD. (2003). Household characteristics of youth with disabilities. In
WagnerM.MarderC.LevineP.CametoR.CadwalladerT. W.
, &
BlackorbyJ.
(with CardosoD. & NewmanL.). The individual and household characteristics of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Available at: http://www.nlts2.org/reports/components/component1.html.
18.
MorrisonO. P. (2007). Group facilitation for non-profit leaders – The World Café. Social, Capital, Civic Engagement, Strong Communities. Pittsburgh, PA: Nexus.
19.
National Collaboration on Workforce and Disability. (2015). Benefits planning. Washington, D.C.: Office of Disability Employment Policy.
20.
National Council on Disability (2011). Rising expectations: The developmental disabilities act revisited. Washington, D.C.: Author.
21.
SilversteinR. (2010). A description and analysis of the federal and selected state policy frameworks regarding order of selection under Title I of the Rehabilitation Act. Boston, MA: Institute for Community Inclusion, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Vocational Rehabilitation.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
24.
TrainorA. A., CarterE. W., OwensL., & SwedeenB. (2008). Special educators’ perceptionsof summer employment and community participation opportunities for youth withdisabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 3, 144–153.
25.
TrainorA. A., CarterE. W., SwedeenB., & PickettK. (2012). Community conversation: An approach for expanding and connecting opportunities for employment for adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 49–59. doi:
10.1177/0885728811419166
26.
Tubbs-CooleyH., MartsolfD. S., PicklerR.,
MorrisonC., & WardlawC. (2013). Development of a regional nursing research partnership for academic and practice collaboration. Nursing Research & Practice. Available online http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745952/
27.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). Employment and unemployment among youth summary. Washington, D.C.: Author.
28.
WagnerM., CametoR., & NewmanL. (2003). Youth with disabilities: A changing population. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
29.
WagnerM., NewmanL., CametoR., GarzaN., & LevineP. (2005), After high school: A firstlook at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
30.
WillsJ. (2008). Preparing ALL Youth for Academic and Career Readiness, Washington, D.C.: National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth, Institute for Educational Leadership.
