College students with disabilities continue to experience difficulties adjusting to the academic and social demands of university life despite an increase in recognition by postsecondary institutions.
OBJECTIVE:
Social support for college students with disabilities is the focus of this study.
METHODS:
Relationship types – specifically parent, peer, and partner supports – were examined in order to clarify their impact on the academic success of college students with disabilities at a four-year university (n = 200).
RESULTS:
An examination of main and moderating effects showed relationship types have differential effects on academic success outcomes, specifically college grade point average and self-reported educational, practical, and social/emotional gains. For certain outcomes, parent, peer, and partner support buffered the negative effects of course efficacy and social support satisfaction.
CONCLUSION:
These findings suggest that certain relationship types can make meaningful differences in positively affecting college experiences of student with disabilities, and illustrate the importance of considering relationship types and quality of social support in future research on social networks. Implications for disability services providers and secondary transition educators are discussed.
ArmstrongE. A., & HamiltonL. T. (2014). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BaronR. M., & KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
3.
ChaoR. C. (2011). Managing stress and maintaining well-being: Social support, problem-focused coping, and avoidant coping. Journal of Counseling Development, 89, 338–348.
4.
ChenX. (2005). First Generation Students in Postsecondary Education: A Look at Their College Transcripts. NCES. 2005-171. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
CookL., HennesseyM. L., CookB. G. & RumrillP. D. (2007). The views of university faculty members and service providers regarding the increased enrollment of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 205–216.
6.
CosdenM. A., & McNamaraJ. (1997). Self-concept and perceived social support among college students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 2–12.
7.
Faggella-LubyM., LombardiA., LalorA., & DukesL. L. (2014). Methodological trends in disability and higher education research: A historical analysis of the Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(4), 357–368.
8.
FinnL. L. (1998). Students’ perceptions of beneficial LD accommodations and services at the postsecondary level. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13, 46–67.
9.
Galatzer-LevyI. R., BurtonC. L., & BonnanoG. A. (2012). Coping flexibility, potentially traumatic life events, and resilience: A prospective study of college student adjustment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31(6), 542–567.
10.
GerberP. J., GinsbergR., & ReiffH. B. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475–487.
11.
GulamW. A., & TriskaJ. (1998). Students with special needs: A paradigm for the transition from school to college in the United Kingdom. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13(2), 29–36.
12.
HartleyM. T. (2012). Assessing and promoting resilience: An additional tool to address the increasing number of college students with psychological problems. Journal of College Counseling, 15(1), 37–51.
13.
HerzbergD. S., HammenC., BurgeD., DaleyS. E., DavilaJ., & LindbergN. (1999). Attachment cognitions predict perceived and enacted social support during late adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14(4), 387–404.
14.
HoganM. J., ParkerJ. A., WienerJ., WattersC., WoodL. M., & OkeA. (2010). Academic success in adolescence: Relationships among verbal IQ, social support and emotional intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(1), 30–41. doi: 10.1080/00049530903312881
15.
HornL., BerktoldJ., & BobbitL. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
HurstD., & SmerdonB. (2000). Postsecondary students with disabilities: Enrollment, services, and persistence. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(3), 55–55.
17.
KohnP. M., LafreniereK., & GurevichM. (1990). The inventory of college student’s recent life experiences: A decontaminated hassles scale for a special population. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 619–629.
18.
KowalskyR., & FreskoB. (2002). Peer tutoring for college students with disabilities. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(3), 259–271.
19.
LindstromL., DorenB., PostC., & LombardiA. (2013). Building career PATHS for young women with disabilities. Career Development Quarterly, 61(4), 330–338.
20.
LombardiA., GerdesH., & MurrayC. (2011). Validating an assessment of individual actions, postsecondary, and social supports of college students with disabilities. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(1), 107–126.
21.
LombardiA. R., MurrayC., & GerdesH. (2012). Academic performance of first generation college students with disabilities at a four-year university. Journal of College Student Development, 53(6), 811–826.
22.
MartinA. J. (2013). Improving the achievement motivation and engagement of students with ADHD: The role of personal-best goals and other growth-based approaches. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23(1), 143–155.
23.
MorningstarM. E., FreyB. B., NoonanP. M., NgJ., Clavenna-DeaneB., GravesP., & Williams-DiehmK. (2010). A preliminary investigation of the relationship of transition preparation and self-determination for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individual Individuals, 33(2), 80–94.
24.
MorosanuL., HandleyK., & O’DonovanB. (2010). Seeking support: Researching first-year students’ experiences of coping with academic life. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 665–678.
25.
MurrayC., GoldsteinD. E., NourseS., & EdgarE. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 119–127.
26.
MurrayC., LombardiA., & KostyD. (2014). Profiling adjustment among postsecondary students with disabilities: A person-centered approach. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(1), 31–44.
27.
MurrayC., LombardiA. R., BenderF., & GerdesH. (2013). Social support: Main and moderating effects on the relation between financial stress and adjustment among college students with disabilities. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 277–295.
28.
MurrayC., & WrenC. T. (2003). Cognitive, academic, and attitudinal predictors of the grade point averages of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 407–415.
29.
MyersK. A., & BastianJ. J. (2010). Understanding communication preferences of college students with visual disabilities. Journal Of College Student Development, 51(3), 265–278. doi:10.1353/csd.0.0129.
30.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2011). Reliability: 2010 Internal consistency. Downloaded from nsse.iub.edu/links/psychometric portfolio.
PhamC., KeenanT., & HanB. (2013). Evaluating Impacts of Early Adolescent Romance in High School on Academic Outcomes. Journal Of Applied Economics And Business Research, 3(1), 14–33.
33.
QualtricsLLC. (2014). Qualtrics Survey Site.
34.
RaueK., &LewisL. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions (NCES 2011-018). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from, http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011018.pdf.
35.
RodriguezN., MiraC. B., MyersH. F., MorrisJ. K., & CardozaD. (2003). Family or friends: Who plays a greater supportive role for Latino college students?Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 9, 236–250.
36.
SanfordC., NewmanL., WagnerM., CametoR., KnokeyA. -M., & ShaverD. (2011). The Post-High School Outcomes of Young Adults With Disabilities up to Years After High School. Key Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011–3004). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
37.
SarasonI. G., LevineH. M., BashamR. B., & SarasonB. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1222–1225.
38.
SarasonI. G., SarasonB. R., ShearinE. N., & PierceG. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510.
39.
SmockS. A., BakerA. K., HarrisK. S., & D’SauzaC. (2011). The role of social support in collegiate recovery communities: A review of the literature. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 29, 35–44.
40.
SolbergV. S., O’BrienK., VillarealP., KennelR., & DavisB. (1993). Self-efficacy and Hispanic college students: Validation of the college self-efficacy instrument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 80–95.
41.
SPSS, Inc. (2011). SPSS 20.0 for Windows.. Lead Technologies.
42.
StrayhornT. L. (2006), Factors influencing the academic achievement of first-generation college students. NASPA Journal Online, 43(4), 82–111.
43.
ThomasS. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 591–615.
44.
WehmeyerM. L. (2013). Beyond pathology: Positive psychology and disability. In The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Disability (ed. WehmeyerM.). New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
45.
WenzelC., & RowleyL. (2010). Teaching social skills and academic strategies to college students with Asperger’s Syndrome. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(5), 44–50.
46.
WesselR. D., JonesJ. A., MarkleL., & WestfallC. (2009). Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: Facilitating student success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21(3), 116–125.
47.
WintreM. G., & YaffeM. (2000). First-year students’ adjustment to university life as a function of relationships with parents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 9–37.
