Three impossible things before lunch – the task of a sample environment specialist

Abstract

In the course of their day, sample environment professionals can be confronted by numerous technical challenges applicable to a range of scientific questions. This paper presents three successful outcomes from user-posed sample environment challenges for in situ neutron scattering experiments undertaken at the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (formerly the Bragg Institute). The sample environments presented here have nothing in common other than their novelty. They may not be the best solution but have been constrained by time, resources and ability. The questions the users posed were:

Can we mount a cylinder in cylinder (CIC) rheometer, more regularly used on a small angle scattering instrument, on a diffraction instrument and obtain usable data? Can we supply high-voltage (up to 10 kV) across a sample within the Paris–Edinburgh press while mounted on a powder diffraction instrument? And finally can a Lakeshore 340 and an in-house built liquid conductivity cell do the job of a commercial liquid conductivity meter? This paper presents the engineering and equipment solutions that were used to answer these questions, and in each case the scientific users left with useful, intriguing and, hopefully, publishable data.

Keywords

Neutron scattering sample environment tripalmitin rheology high voltage liquid conductivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

J.M.

Besson,

R.J.

Nelmes,

Hamel,

J.S.

Loveday,

Weill and

Hull, Neutron powder diffraction above 10 GPa, Physica B: Condensed Matter180 (1992).

P.A.

Bruttel, Conductometry – conductivity measurement, Metrohm Monograph, 8.028.5003 – 2004-11.

J.D.

Cobine, Gaseous Conductors, 1st edn, McGraw Hill Book Company, 1941.

A.M.

Feltham and

Spiro, Platinized Platinum Electrodes, Chem. Rev.71(2) (1971), 177–193.

E.P.

Gilbert,

J.C.

Schulz and

T.J.

Noakes, Physica B385–386 (2006), 1180–1182. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.05.385.

James,

Nelson,

S.A.

Holt,

Saerbeck,

W.A.

Hamilton and

Klose, Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research A632 (2011), 112–123.

Klotz,

Hamel and

Frelat, High Press. Res.24 (2004), 219. doi:10.1080/08957950410001661963.

Lakeshore 340 User Manual, Lake Shore Cryotronics Inc, Rev 3.2 2008, 1–7.

One example of such a detector is http://www.knauer.net/en/product/azura_cm_21s.html.

10.

Rehm,

Brule,

A.K.

Freund and

S.J.

Kennedy, J. Appl. Crystallogr.46 (2013), 1699–1704. doi:10.1107/S0021889813025788.

11.

Sokolova,

Christoforidis,

Eltobaji,

Barnes,

Darmann,

A.E.

Whitten and

de Campo, BILBY: Time-of-flight small angle scattering instrument, Neutron News27(2) (2016), 9–13. doi:10.1080/10448632.2016.1163980.

12.

Stuart,

Thomas,

Maynard-Casely,

Booth and

Leung, A neutron diffraction investigation of shear forces on a model lipid for forensic application, ANZFSS 2016.

13.

B.H.

Stuart,

S.J.

Notter,

Langlois,

Maynard,

Ray and

Berkahn, Journal of Forensic Science52 (2007), 938–942. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00479.x.

14.

A.J.

Studer,

M.E.

Hagen and

T.J.

Noakes, Physica B385–386 (2006), 1013–1015. doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.05.323.

15.

N.G.

Trinh, Electrode design for testing in uniform field gaps, IEEE Trans. Power App. and Sys, PAS-993 (1980), 1235–1242. doi:10.1109/TPAS.1980.319754.