Gender similarities and differences have long been a matter of debate in almost all human research, especially upon reaching the discussion about brain functions. This large scale meta-analysis was performed on functional MRI studies. It included more than 700 active brain foci from more than 70 different experiments to study gender related similarities and differences in brain activation strategies for three of the main brain functions: Visual-spatial cognition, memory, and emotion. Areas that are significantly activated by both genders (i.e. core areas) for the tested brain function are mentioned, whereas those areas significantly activated exclusively in one gender are the gender specific areas. During visual-spatial cognition task, and in addition to the core areas, males significantly activated their left superior frontal gyrus, compared with left superior parietal lobule in females. For memory tasks, several different brain areas activated by each gender, but females significantly activated two areas from the limbic system during memory retrieval tasks. For emotional task, males tend to recruit their bilateral prefrontal regions, whereas females tend to recruit their bilateral amygdalae. This meta-analysis provides an overview based on functional MRI studies on how males and females use their brain.
AddisD.R., MoloneyE.E., TippettL.J., RobertsR.P. and HachS., Characterizing cerebellar activity during autobiographical memory retrieval: ALE and functional connectivity investigations, Neuropsychologia90 (2016), 80–93. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.025.
2.
AlRyalatS.A., The age of 40, a cut-point for the change in the emotional responses of the brain: A voxel-based meta-analysis, J. Syst. Integr. Neurosci.2(3) (2016). doi:10.15761/JSIN.1000132.
3.
ArdilaA., BernalB. and RosselliM., The language area of the brain: A functional reassessment, Rev. Neurol.62(3) (2016), 97–106.
4.
BokdeA.L., Lopez-BayoP., MeindlT., PechlerS., BornC., FaltracoF.et al., Functional connectivity of the fusiform gyrus during a face-matching task in subjects with mild cognitive impairment, Brain129(Pt 5) (2006), 1113–1124. doi:10.1093/brain/awl051.
5.
BorD., CummingN., ScottC.E. and OwenA.M., Prefrontal cortical involvement in verbal encoding strategies, Eur. J. Neurosci.19(12) (2004), 3365–3370. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03438.x.
6.
ChouT.L., BoothJ.R., BitanT., BurmanD.D., BigioJ.D., ConeN.E.et al., Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words, Hum. Brain Mapp.27(11) (2006), 915–924. doi:10.1002/hbm.20231.
7.
CohenM.S. and BookheimerS.Y., Localization of brain function using magnetic resonance imaging, Trends Neurosci.17(7) (1994), 268–277. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(94)90055-8.
8.
CooperL.A., Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity, J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.2(4) (1976), 503–514. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.503.
9.
CowanN., What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?, Prog. Brain Res.169 (2008), 323–338. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9.
10.
EickhoffS.B., LairdA.R., GrefkesC., WangL.E., ZillesK. and FoxP.T., Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty, Hum. Brain Mapp.30 (2009), 2907–2926. doi:10.1002/hbm.20718.
11.
EtkinA., BuchelC. and GrossJ.J., The neural bases of emotion regulation, Nat. Rev. Neurosci.16(11) (2015), 693–700. doi:10.1038/nrn4044.
12.
EtkinA., EgnerT., PerazaD.M., KandelE.R. and HirschJ., Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala, Neuron51(6) (2006), 871–882. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029.
13.
FletcherP.C. and HensonR.N., Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging, Brain124(Pt 5) (2001), 849–881. doi:10.1093/brain/124.5.849.
Goldman-RakicP.S., Regional and cellular fractionation of working memory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93(24) (1996), 13473–13480. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13473.
16.
Gorno-TempiniM.L., PriceC.J., JosephsO., VandenbergheR., CappaS.F., KapurN.et al., The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing, Brain121(Pt 11) (1998), 2103–2118. doi:10.1093/brain/121.11.2103.
17.
GreenbergD.L., RiceH.J., CooperJ.J., CabezaR., RubinD.C. and LabarK.S., Co-activation of the amygdala, hippocampus and inferior frontal gyrus during autobiographical memory retrieval, Neuropsychologia43(5) (2005), 659–674. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.002.
18.
HalpernA.R., O'ConnorM.G., Implicit memory for music in Alzheimer's disease, Neuropsychology14(3) (2000), 391–397. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.14.3.391.
19.
HoferA., SiedentopfC.M., IschebeckA., RettenbacherM.A., VeriusM., FelberS.et al., Gender differences in regional cerebral activity during the perception of emotion: A functional MRI study, Neuroimage32(2) (2006), 854–862. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.053.
20.
HugdahlK., ThomsenT. and ErslandL., Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation, Neuropsychologia44(9) (2006), 1575–1583. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.026.
21.
HydeJ.S., Gender similarities still rule, Am. Psychol.61 (2006), 641–642. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.641b.
22.
JohnsonM.D. and OjemannG.A., The role of the human thalamus in language and memory: Evidence from electrophysiological studies, Brain Cogn.42(2) (2000), 218–230. doi:10.1006/brcg.1999.1101.
23.
KanwisherN., McDermottJ. and ChunM.M., The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception, J. Neurosci.17(11) (1997), 4302–4311.
24.
LancasterJ.L., LairdA.R., EickhoffS.B., MartinezM.J., FoxP.M. and FoxP.T., Automated regional behavioral analysis for human brain images, Front. Neuroinform.6 (2012), 23.
25.
LancasterJ.L., Tordesillas-GutierrezD., MartinezM., SalinasF., EvansA., ZillesK.et al., Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template, Hum. Brain Mapp.28(11) (2007), 1194–1205. doi:10.1002/hbm.20345.
26.
LawtonC. and GenderH.D., Differences in integration of images in visuospatial memory, Sex Roles53(9) (2005), 717–725. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7736-1.
27.
LeffA.P., SchofieldT.M., CrinionJ.T., SeghierM.L., GroganA., GreenD.W.et al., The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: Evidence from 210 patients with stroke, Brain132(Pt 12) (2009), 3401–3410. doi:10.1093/brain/awp273.
28.
LeveroniC.L., SeidenbergM., MayerA.R., MeadL.A., BinderJ.R. and RaoS.M., Neural systems underlying the recognition of familiar and newly learned faces, J. Neurosci.20(2) (2000), 878–886.
29.
MaddockR.J., GarrettA.S. and BuonocoreM.H., Remembering familiar people: The posterior cingulate cortex and autobiographical memory retrieval, Neuroscience104(3) (2001), 667–676. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00108-7.
30.
McRaeK., MisraS., PrasadA.K., PereiraS.C. and GrossJ.J., Bottom-up and top-down emotion generation: Implications for emotion regulation, Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.7(3) (2012), 253–262. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq103.
31.
MechiasM.L., EtkinA. and KalischR., A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: Implications for conscious appraisal of threat, Neuroimage49(2) (2010), 1760–1768. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.040.
32.
MenonV., FordJ.M., LimK.O., GloverG.H. and PfefferbaumA., Combined event-related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal-parietal cortex activation during target detection, Neuroreport8(14) (1997), 3029–3037. doi:10.1097/00001756-199709290-00007.
33.
OwenA.M., The role of the lateral frontal cortex in mnemonic processing: The contribution of functional neuroimaging, Exp. Brain Res.133(1) (2000), 33–43. doi:10.1007/s002210000398.
34.
OwenA.M., McMillanK.M., LairdA.R. and BullmoreE., N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies, Hum. Brain Mapp.25(1) (2005), 46–59. doi:10.1002/hbm.20131.
35.
RenierL.A., AnurovaI., De VolderA.G., CarlsonS., VanMeterJ. and RauscheckerJ.P., Preserved functional specialization for spatial processing in the middle occipital gyrus of the early blind, Neuron68(1) (2010), 138–148. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.021.
36.
Salimi-KhorshidiG., SmithS.M., KeltnerJ.R., WagerT.D. and NicholsT.E., Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies, Neuroimage45(3) (2009), 810–823. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039.
37.
ShepardR.N. and MetzlerJ., Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science171(3972) (1971), 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701.
38.
SpiersH.J., BurgessN., HartleyT., Vargha-KhademF. and O'KeefeJ., Bilateral hippocampal pathology impairs topographical and episodic memory but not visual pattern matching, Hippocampus11(6) (2001), 715–725. doi:10.1002/hipo.1087.
39.
SvobodaE., McKinnonM.C. and LevineB., The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: A meta-analysis, Neuropsychologia44(12) (2006), 2189–2208. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.023.
40.
ThomsenT., HugdahlK., ErslandL., BarndonR., LundervoldA., SmievollA., RoscherB. and SundbergH., Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of sex differences in a mental rotation task, Med. Sci. Monit.6(6) (2008), 1186–1196.
41.
TomasinoB. and GremeseM., Effects of stimulus type and strategy on mental rotation network: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis, Front. Hum. Neurosci.9 (2015), 693.
42.
VranaS.R., SpenceE.L. and LangP.J., The startle probe response: A new measure of emotion?, J. Abnorm. Psychol.97(4) (1988), 487–491. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.4.487.
43.
ZacksJ.M., Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review, J. Cogn. Neurosci.20(1) (2008), 1–19. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20013.
