Process parameter configuration needs to respond quickly in the customized manufacturing environment. A multi-objective optimization method based on antlion algorithm for product process configuration design is proposed. The weight mapping mechanism of customer demands is established to clarify the relationship between customer demands and manufacturing process, which also simplifies the process attribute analysis of customized products. The parameters to be optimized in the customization process are analyzed: product performance, process cost and production time. Based on the objective function including these parameters, a multi-objective optimization model of modular process reconstruction is established. The proposed model and algorithm can optimize these parameters in parallel and realize the rapid configuration of product modular process. In the application case of this paper, the proposed method is suitable for the whole process modular configuration of copper plate and strip. The feasibility and effectiveness of the model and algorithm in the proposed configuration scheme are verified.
HuangJ., LiY., ChuX., et al., An integrated top-down design process evaluation approach of complex products and systems based on hierarchical design structure matrix, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing28(10) (2015), 1015–1029.
2.
JiangH., KwongC.K., SiuK.W.M., et al., Rough set and pso-based anfis approaches to modeling customer satisfaction for affective product design, Advanced Engineering Informatics29(3) (2015), 727–738.
3.
RezakazemiM., DashtiA., AsghariM., et al., H2 -selective mixed matrix membranes modeling using anfis, psoanfis, ga-anfis, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy42(22) (2017), 15211–15225.
4.
ShirkouhiS.N. and KeramatiA., Modeling customer satisfaction with new product design using a flexible fuzzy regression-data envelopment analysis algorithm, Applied Mathematical Modelling50(20) (2017), 755–771.
5.
JiangH., SabetzadehF., LinZ., et al., Nonlinear time series fuzzy regression for developing explainable consumer preferences’models based on online comments, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems30(10) (2022), 4460–4470.
6.
LiY., FengB., LiG., et al., Optimal distributed generation planning in active distribution networks considering integration of energy storage – sciencedirect, Applied Energy210 (2018), 1073–1081.
7.
YinZ.A.,
GgwA,
KlB., et al., Enhancing moea/d with information feedback models for large-scale many-objective optimization – sciencedirect, Information Sciences522 (2020), 1–16.
8.
GuZ.M. and WangG.G., Improving nsga-iii algorithms with information feedback models for large-scale many-objective optimization, Future Generation Computer Systems107 (2020), 49–69.
9.
DarkoA.P. and LiangD., Modeling customer satisfaction through online reviews: A flowsort group decision model under probabilistic linguistic settings, Expert Systems with Applications195(3) (2022), 1–14.
10.
ZhangT. and KwokY., An interactive product customization framework for freeform shapes, Rapid Prototyping Journal23(6) (2017), 1136–1145.
11.
ZhuJ., ShaohuiS.U., ChenC., et al., Improved interactive genetic algorithm for product configuration design, China Mechanical Engineering29(20) (2018), 2474–2478.
12.
GuoS., ChoiT.M., ShenB., et al., Inventory management in mass customization operations: A review, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management66(3) (2019), 412–428.
13.
LiR., ZhangH., QinS., et al., Customization design method for complex product systems based on a meta-model, Advances in Mechanical Engineering11(10) (2019), 1–16.
14.
ZhaoS., ZhangQ., PengZ. and FanY., Integrating customer requirements into customized product configuration design based on kano’s model, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing31(3) (2020), 597–613.
15.
WedowatiE.R., SinggihM.L. and GunartaI.K., Product value analysis on customized product based on pleasurable design and time-driven activity-based costing in food industry, Cogent Business and Management7(1) (2020), 1–16.
16.
WangY., LiX. and TsungF., Configuration-based smart customization service: A multitask learning approach, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering11(4) (2020), 2038–2047.
17.
WangY., ZhaoW. and WanW., Needs-based product configurator design for mass customization using hierarchical attention network, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering18(1) (2021), 195–204.
18.
CorradiniF., FedeliA., FornariF., et al., Floware: amodel-driven approach fostering reuse and customisation in iot applications modelling and development, Software and Systems Modeling22(1) (2023), 131–158.
19.
ChakrabortyS. and DasP.P., A multivariate quality loss function approach for parametric optimization of non-traditional machining processes, Management Science Letters8(8) (2018), 873–884.
20.
ShaoJ.F., Chuang-TaoM.A., ManagementS.O., et al., Intelligent control model for yarn quality based on multi-process knowledge association, Control Theory and Applications35(6) (2018), 840–849.
21.
SefeneE.M. and ChenC., Multi-objective optimization of energy consumption, surface roughness, and material removal rate in diamond wire sawing for monocrystalline silicon wafer, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology129(5-6) (2023), 2563–2576.
22.
KulcsarE., GyurikaI. and CsiszerT., Network-based – quality function deployment (nb-qfd): The combination of traditional qfd with network science approach and techniques, Computers in Industry30(1) (2022), 1–12.
23.
DubeyH.M., PanditM. and PanigrahiB.K., Ant lion optimization for short-term wind integrated hydrothermal power generation scheduling, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems83(1) (2016), 158–174.
24.
KambojV.K., BhadoriaA. and BathS.K., Solution of nonconvex economic load dispatch problem for small-scale power systems using ant lion optimizer, Neural Computing and Applications28(8) (2017), 2181–2192.
25.
KaushalK. and SinghS., Allocation of stocks in a portfolio using antlion algorithm: Investor’s perspective, The IUP Journal of Applied Economics16(1) (2017), 34–49.
26.
MouassaS. and BouktirT., Multi-objective ant lion optimization algorithm to solve large-scale multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch problem, Compel38(1) (2019), 304–324.
27.
RajuM., SaikiaL.C. and SinhaN., Automatic generation control of a multi-area system using ant lion optimizer algorithm based pid plus second order derivative controller, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems80(9) (2016), 52–63.
28.
PetroviM., PetronijeviJ., MitiM., et al., The ant lion optimization algorithm for integrated process planning and scheduling, Applied Mechanics and Materials834 (2016), 187–192.
29.
RajanA., JeevanK. and MalakarT., Weighted elitism based antlion optimizer to solve optimum var planning problem, Applied Soft Computing55(1) (2017), 352–370.
30.
TalatahariS., Optimum design of skeletal structures using ant lion optimizer, International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering6(1) (2016), 13–25.
31.
Saxena, Prerna, Kothari, and Ashwin, Ant lion optimization algorithm to control side lobe level and null depths in linear antenna arrays, AEU: Archiv fur Elektronik und Ubertragungstechnik: Electronic and Communication70(9) (2016), 1339–1349.
32.
MirjaliliS., The ant lion optimizer, Advances in Engineering Software83(3) (2015), 80–98.
33.
MirjaliliS., JangirP. and SaremiS., Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: a multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems, Applied Intelligence46(1) (2017), 79–95.
34.
JoelC., SeguraC. and CoelloC., Vsd-moea: A dominancebased multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with explicit variable space diversity management, Evolutionary Computation30(2) (2022), 195–219.
35.
WuW., ZhangJ., LinZ., et al., Antlion optimization algorithm based on double feedback mechanism, Computer Engineering and Applications538(12) (2017), 31–35.
