This paper introduces an expert system to decision-making. The expert system is linguistic summarization combined with prioritized operators. In the practical decision-making problems, the information of attributes is linguistic type and needs to be converted into numerical type. The validity of the linguistic summarization is recorded as the attribute value. We discuss how to calculate the validity of the linguistic summarization, and present three prioritized operators. Then the three prioritized operators are used to aggregate the attribute values. Finally, a practical example is given. In addition, we conduct a comparative analysis between the expert system method and another multi-attribute decision-making method by using a measure of specificity, and conclude that the expert system method is better.
YagerR.R., On linguistic summaries of data, Knowledge Discovery in Databases (1991), 347–363.
2.
LesotM.J.MoyseG.Bouchon-MeunierB., Interpretability of fuzzy linguistic summaries, Fuzzy Sets and Systems292 (2016), 307–317.
3.
WidyassariA.P.RustadS.ShidikG.F.NoersasongkoE.SyukurA.AffandyA.SetiadiD.R.I.M., Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences34 (2022), 1029–1046.
4.
KacprzykJ.ZadroznyS., Linguistic database summaries and their protoforms: Towards natural language based knowledge discovery tools, Information Sciences173 (2005), 281–304.
5.
KacprzykJ.WilbikA.ZadroznyS., Linguistic summarization of time series using a fuzzy quantifier driven aggregation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems159 (2008), 1485–1499.
6.
YagerR.R.YagerR.L., Using linguistic summaries and concepts for understanding large data, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence56 (2016), 273–280.
7.
LiB.Q.XuZ.S., Prioritized aggregation operators based on the priority degrees in multicriteria decision-making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34 (2019), 1985–2018.
8.
HeY.D.ChenH.Y.HeZ.WangG.ZhouL.G., Scaled prioritized aggregation operators and their applications to decision making, Soft Computing20 (2014), 1021–1039.
YagerR.R., On prioritized multiple-criteria aggregation, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern34 (2012), 1297–1305.
13.
FanZ.P.LiuY., An approach to solve group-decision-making problems with odinal interval numbers, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern40 (2010), 1413–1423.
14.
TrappeyA.TrappeyC.V.HsuF.C.HsiaoD.W., A fuzzy ontological konwledge document clustering menthodology, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern39 (2009), 806–814.
15.
YangR.WangZ.HengP.A.LeungK.S., Fuzzified Choquet integral with a fuzzy-valued integrand and its application on temperature prediction, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern38 (2008), 367–380.
16.
ZhangW.ChenF.XuW., Hierarchical control models for multimodal process modeling, IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern39 (2009), 1324–1329.
17.
BrockD.C.GradB., Expert systems: Commercializing artificial intelligence, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing44 (2022), 5–7.
18.
InusahF.MissahY.M.NajimU.TwumF., Agile neural expert system for managing basic education, Intelligent Systems with Applications17 (2023), 200178.
19.
KianiA.EbadiH.AhmadiF.MasoumiS., Design and implementation of an expert interpreter system for intelligent acquisition of spatial data from aerial or remotely sensed images, Measurement47 (2014), 676–685.
20.
DavidS.NilsB., Improving steering of a powered wheelchair using an expert system to interpret hand tremor, Intelltgent Robotics and Applications9245 (2015), 460–471.
21.
SinghB.EbtehajI.SihagP.BonakdariH., An expert system for predicting the infiltration characteristics, Water Supply22 (2022), 2847–2862.
22.
TehseenR.FarooqM.S.AbidA., Fuzzy expert system for earthquake prediction in Western Himalayan Range, Electronics & Electrical Engineering26 (2020), 4–12.
23.
RehmanH.U.BoorF.WasifM.IqbalS.A., A novel method for process planning for die and mould manufacturing using expert system approach, Transactions of FAMENA45 (2021), 105–130.
24.
WangT.ZhaoJ.XuQ.S.PedryczW.WangW., A dynamic scheduling framework for byproduct gas system gombining expert knowledge and production plan, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering20 (2023), 541–552.
25.
DashtiS.M.S.DashtiS.F., An expert system to diagnose spinal disorders, The Open Bioinformatics Journal13 (2020), 57–73.
26.
KimH.ChuvikovD.A.AladinD.V.VarlamovO.O.AdamovaL.E.OsipovV.G., Creating a knowledge base for a mivar expert system for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, Biomedical Engineering54 (2021), 421–424.
27.
VoronenkoM.KovalchukO.LytvynenkoL.VyshemyrskaS.KrakI.V., An expert system prototype for the early diagnosis of pneumonia, Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies77 (2021), 714–728.
28.
AGebiS.CelikM.KahramanC.ErI.D., An expert system towards solving ship auxiliary machinery troubleshooting: Shipamtsolver, Expert System with Applicatins36 (2009), 7219–7227.
29.
RandhawaS.U.BartonW.J.FaruquiS.D., Wavesolder assistant: An expert system to aid troubleshooting of the wave soldering process, Computers & Industrial Engineering10 (1986), 325–334.
30.
HinC.C.UllahM.B., An expert system for the design of elevators in buildings, Architectural Science Review33 (1990), 63–69.
31.
YagerR.R.FilevD.P., Parameterized and-uke and or-like OWA operators, International Journal of General Systems22 (1994), 297–316.
32.
GarmendiaL.CampoR.G.YagerR.R., Recursively spreadable and reductible measures of specificity, Information Sciences326 (2016), 270–277.
33.
YagerR.R., Measuring tranquility and anxiety in decision making: An application of fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems8 (1982), 139–146.
