In this study, a unique generative adversarial network (GAN) architectural variation was suggested, which engages in adversarial game serve by preserving an appropriate distance in the latent dimension of the network. This method overcomes the mode collapse problem with a small dataset. Extensive experiments are conducted using the segmented medical leaf dataset with various classes and the generator network is able to produce all the artificial image classes. This is accomplished by combining a unique training technique with a reasonably simple model design.
Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford and Xi Chen, Improved techniques for training gans, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, 2234–2242.
2.
Xudong Mao, Qing Li, Haoran Xie, Raymond LauY.K. and Zhen Wang, Multi-class generative adversarial networks with the L2 loss function. CoRR, abs/1611.04076, 2016. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04076.
3.
Naveen Kodali, James Hays, Jacob Aethy and Zsolt Kira, On convergence and stability of gans. 2018
4.
ArjovskyM. and BottouL., Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks. arxiv 2017. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.04862.
5.
Ishaan Gulrajani, Faruk Ahmed, Martin Arjovsky, Dumoulin and Aaron CourvilleC, Improved training of wasserstein gans, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 5767–5777.
Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala and Léon Bottou, Wasserstein generative adversarial networks, In International Conference on Machine Learning 2017, 214–223.
8.
Alireza Makhzani, Jonathon Shlens, Navdeep Jaitly and Ian GoodfellowJ., Adversarial autoen- 576
coders. CoRR, abs/1511.05644, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05644.
9.
Anders Boesen Lindbo Larsen, Søren Kaae Sønderby and Ole Winther, Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metric. CoRR, abs/1512.09300, 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.09300.
10.
Trung Tran, Tuan-Anh Bui and Ngai-Man Cheung, Distgan: An improved gan using distance constraints, In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2018, 370–385.
SrivastavaA., ValkovL., RussellC., GutmannM.U. and SuttonC., Veegan: Reducing mode collapse in gans using implicit variational learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07761. 2017.
13.
LinZ., KhetanA., FantiG. and OhS., Pacgan: The power of two samples in generative adversarial networks, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2018.
14.
XiaoC., ZhongP. and ZhengC., Bourgan: Generative networks with metric embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.07674. 2018.
15.
XiaoH., RasulK. and VollgrafR., Fashion-mnist: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07747. 2017.
16.
MaoQ., LeeH.-Y., TsengH.-Y., MaS. and YangM.-H., Mode seeking generative adversarial networks for diverse image synthesis, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2019, 1429–1437.
17.
Qin Yi, Zhiwen Wang and Dejun Xi, Tree CycleGAN with maximum diversity loss for image augmentation and its application into gear pitting detection, Applied Soft Computing114 (2022), 108130.
18.
Wu Yang and Lihong Xu, Image generation of tomato leaf disease identification based on adversarial-VAE, Agriculture11.10 (2021), 981.
19.
Liu Bin, et al.Identification of apple leaf diseases based on deep convolutional neural networks, Symmetry10.1 (2017), 11.
20.
KrizhevskyA., HintonG., et al. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, 2009.
21.
ShortenC. and KhoshgoftaarT.M., A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning, Journal of Big Data6(1) (2019), 60.
22.
PerezL. and WangJ., The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.04621. 2017.
23.
ZophB., CubukE.D., GhiasiG., LinT.-Y., ShlensJ. and LeQ.V., Learning data augmentation strategies for object detection, In European Conference on Computer Vision 2020, 566–583. Springer.
24.
GoodfellowI., Pouget-AbadieJ., MirzaM., XuB., Warde-FarleyD., OzairS., CourvilleA. and BengioY., Generative adversarial nets, In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2014, 2672–2680.
25.
ArjovskyM., ChintalaS. and BottouL., Wasserstein gan. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07875. 2017.
26.
ZeilerM.D. and FergusR., Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks, In European Conference on Computer Vision 2014, 818–833. Springer.
27.
ZhouB., KhoslaA., LapedrizaA., OlivaA. and TorralbaA., Learning deep features for discriminative localization, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2016, 2921–2929.
28.
SelvarajuR.R., CogswellM., DasA., VedantamR., ParikhD. and BatraD., Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2017, 618–626.
NafiN.M. and HsuW.H., Addressing class imbalance in image-based plant disease detection: Deep generative vs. sampling-based approaches. In 2020 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP) (2020) (pp. 243–248). IEEE.
