Disputes are inevitable in construction. Tremendous losses caused by dispute are so amazing that professionals try to figure out how to manage it. It is a practical way to study the dispute problem from the perspective of governance theory. In this study, the paper intends to investigate the characteristics of contractual governance for disputes. Based on governance theory, the framework of contractual governance for dispute is constituted of governance structure (GS) and governance mechanism (GM). The flexibility of GS and GMs are all explored so as to better draft the contracts. By a multiple cases study, a new conceptual model instructing governance picture for construction disputes was proposed which was mainly inspired from literature. The cases study shows that the GS determination is rigidly drafted and executed while the mostly GMs are flexibly designed. The rigid GS has an advantage to a stable foundation and the flexible GMs are apt to coordinate the disputes.
KumaraswamyM.M., Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management4(2) (1997), 95–111.
2.
CheungS.O. and YiuT.W., Are construction disputes inevitable?IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management53(3) (2006), 456–470.
3.
ChenY.Q., ZhangY.B. and ZhangS.J., Impacts of different types of owner-contractor conflict on cost performance in construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management140(6) (2014), Article ID 040114017.
4.
TukiainenS., AaltonenK. and MurtonenM., Coping with an unexpected event: Project managers’ contrasting sensemaking in a stakeholder conflict in China, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business3(3) (2010), 526–543.
5.
Peña-MoraF., SosaC. and Mc ConeS., Dispute avoidance andresolution in large scale civil engineering system. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2002.
6.
BevirM., A theory of governance. Berkeley, CA: University of California, 2013.
7.
TurnerJ.R. and KeeganA., The versatile project-based organization: Governance and operational control, European Management Journal17(3) (1999), 296–309.
8.
SaadS., ChristineP., EmmanuelM. and AndrewK., Contractual governance as a source of institutionalised waste in construction A review, implications, and road map for future research directions, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business10(3) (2017), 550–577.
9.
PoppoL. and ZengerT., Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategy Management Journal23(8) (2002), 707–725.
10.
ZhangS., ZhangS., GaoY. and DingX., Contractual Governance: Effects of Risk Allocation on Contractors’ Cooperative Behavior in Construction Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management142(6) (2016), Article ID 04016005.
11.
CheungS.O., WangW.K., YiuT.W. and KowkT.W., Exploring the influence of contract governance on construction dispute negotiation, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice134(4) (2008), 391–398.
12.
YanL., andZhangL., Interplay of Contractual Governance and Trust in Improving Construction Project Performance: Dynamic Perspective, Journal of Management in Engineering36(4) (2020), Article ID 04020029.
13.
Benitez-AvilaC., HartmannA., DewulfG. and HenselerJ., Interplay of relational and contractual governance in public-private partnerships: The mediating role of relational norms, trust and partners’ contribution, International Journal of Project Management36(3) (2018), 429–443.
14.
YouB.R. and WuD.Y., Rigid governance and flexible governance: the choice of rural cooperative finance, Journal of Fujian Agricultural and Forestry University (Philosophy and Social Science)21(6) (2018), 35–40.
15.
WuG., LiuC., ZhaoX. and ZuoJ., Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams, International Journal of Project Management35(8) (2017), 1466–1482.
16.
MenassaC.C. and MoraF.P., Analysis of dispute review boards application in U.S. construction projects from 1975 to 2007, Journal of Management in Engineering26(2) (2010), 65–77.
17.
TilletG., Resolving Conflict: A Practical Approach, Sydney Univ. Press, Sydney, Australia, 1991.
18.
HellardR.B., Managing Construction Conflict, Longman Scientific Technology, Harlow, U.K., 1987.
19.
ChenY.Q., ZhangY.B. and ZhangS.J., Impacts of different types of owner-contractor conflict on cost performance in construction projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management140(6) (2014), Article ID 040114017.
20.
Ives.P., Constructive claims: Disputes and delays in construction projects can result in loss and cost for fire contractors, Fire Risk Management(3) (2010), 39–41.
21.
BrookerP., Construction lawyers’ attitudes and experience with ADR, Construction Law Journal18(2) (2002), 97–116.
22.
KumaraswamyM.M., Common categories and causes of construction claims, Construction Law Journal13(1) (1997), 21–34.
23.
Mohd-DanuriM.S., MohdI.Z., MustaffaN.E., Abd-KarimS.B., MohamedO. and A-RahminR.A., Dispute avoidance procedure: Observing the influence of legal culture towards a workable legal system, Pertanika, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities23(2) (2015), 509–535.
24.
MitropoulosP. and HowellG., Model for understanding, preventing and resolving project disputes, Journal of Construction Engineering Management127(3) (2001), 223–231.
25.
CheungS.O. and YeungY.W., The effectiveness of the dispute resolution advisor system: a critical appraisal, International Journal Project Management16(6) (1998), 367–374.
26.
CheungS.O., SuenH.C.H., NgS.T. and LeungM.Y., Convergent views of neutrals and users about alternative dispute resolution, Journal of Management in Engineering20(3) (2004), 88–96.
27.
CheungS.O., TamC.M. and HarrisF.C., Project Dispute Resolution Satisfaction classification through neural network, Journal of Management in Engineering16(1) (2000), 70–79.
28.
LeeC.K., YiuT.W. and CheungS.O., Selection and use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in construction projects – Past and future research, International Journal of Project Management34(3) (2016), 494–507.
29.
HarmonK., Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies, Leadership Management. Engineering3(4) (2003), 187–201.
30.
ThompsonR., VorsterM. and GrotonJ., Innovations to manage disputes, Journal of Management Engineering16(5) (2000), 51–59.
31.
HeY. and WeiX.J., Social work brought into social governance: the generation of technology and art by rigid governance and flexible governance, Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University139(4) (2016), 113–116.
32.
GaoQ.Q., A primary study of the intelligence revolution and national governance modernization, Social Sciences of China (7) (2020), 81–102.
33.
SergeevaN., Towards more flexible approach to governance to allow innovation: the case of UK infrastructure, Journal of Managing Projects in Business13(1) (2020), 1–19.
34.
LaineT., KorhonenT. and SuomalaP., The dynamics of repairing multi-project control practice: a project governance viewpoint,, Journal of Project Management, 2020.
35.
MillerR. and HobbsB., Governance regimes for large projects, Project Management Journal36(3) (2005), 42–51.
36.
TurnerJ.R. and KeenganA., The versatile project-based organization: governance and operation control, European Management Journal17(3) (1999), 296–309.
37.
CleggS., KillenC.P., BiesenthalC. and ShankaranS., Practice, projects and portfolios: Current research trends and new directions, Journal of Project Management36 (2018), 762–772.
38.
CaniëlsM.C., GeldermanC.J. and VermeulenN.P., The interplayof government mechanisms in complex procurement projects, Jouralof Perchasing Supply Management18(2) (2012), 113–121.
39.
FuY., ChenY., ZhangS. and WangW., promoting cooperation in construction projects: An integration approach of contractual incentive and trust, Construction Management and Economics33(8) (2015), 653–670.
40.
GaoN., ChenY. and WangY., Addressing project complexity: The role of contractual functions, Journal of Management Engineering34(3) (2018), Article ID 04018011.
41.
WangD., FangS. and LiK., Dynamic changes of governance mechanisms in mega construction projects in China: The mediating role of opptortunitism, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management24(6) (2019), 723–735.
42.
LuP, GuoS., QianLi, HeP. and XuX., The effectiveness of contractual and relational governances in construction projects in China, International Journal Project Management33(1) (2015), 212–222.
43.
SarhanS., PasuireC., ManuE. and KingA., Contractual governance as a source of institutionalized waste in construction, Journal of Managing Projects in Business10(3) (2017), 550–577.
44.
YanL. and ZhangL.H., interplay of contractual governance and trust in improving construction project performance: dynamic perspective, Journal of Management Engineering36(4) (2020), Article ID 04020029.
45.
Benítez-ÁvilaC., HartmannA. and DewulfG., Contractual and relational governance as positional-practices in ongoing public-private partnership projects, Project ManagementJournal (2019), 8756972819848224.
46.
XueJ.J., YuanH.P. and ShiB.S., impact of contextual variables on effectiveness of partnership governance mechanisms in megaprojects: case of guanxi, Journal of Management Engineering (2016), Article ID 04016034.
47.
HuoB., YeY. and ZhaoX., The impacts of trust and contracts on opportutism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty, Journal of production Economics170 (2015), 160–170.
48.
FaemsD., JanssenM., MadhokA. and VanB., Looy, Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: Connecting contract design, trust dynamics and contract application, Academic Management Journal51(6) (2008), 1053–1078.
49.
NingY., Impact of quality performance ambiguity on contract’s opportunistic behaviors in person-to-organization projects: The mediating roles of contract design and application, International Journal of project Management36(4) (2018), 640–649.
50.
ChangC.Y., A critical review of the application of TCE in the interpretation of risk allocation in PPP contracts, Construction Management and Economics31(2) (2013), 99–103.
51.
SonjaP.L., The development of corporate social responsibility in the Australian construction industry, Construction Management and Economics26(2) (2008), 93–101.
52.
YoungR., ChenW., QuaziA, ParryW., WongA. and KS., The relationship between project governance mechanisms and project success: an international data set, Journal of Management Proceeding in Business13(7) (2019), 1496–1521.
53.
SongH., ZhuF., KlakeggO.J. and WangP., Relationship between contractual flexibility and contractor’s cooperative behavior The mediating effect of justice perception, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business11(2) (2018), 382–405.
54.
DuY., An empirical study on initial trust of the owner to cooperation: the intermediary role of perceived justice of the contractor, Chinese Journal of Management11(10) (2014), 1542–1551.
55.
BartonT.D., HappioH. and BorisovaT., Flexibility in contracting: flexibility and stability in contracts, Press: University of Lapland, Rovaniemi. 2015.
56.
BigstenA., CollierP., DerconS., FafchampsM., GauthierB., GunningJ., OduroA., OostendorpR., PatilloC. and SoderbomM., Contract flexibility and dispute resolution in African manufacturing, The journal of Management and Economics36(4) (2000), 1–37.
57.
YouJ., ChenY., WangW. and ShiC., Uncertainty, opportunistic behavior, and governance in construction project: the efficacy of contracts,, International Journal of Project Management2018.
58.
XueJ., YuanH. and ShiB., Impact of contextual variables on effectiveness of partnership governance mechanisms in megaprojects: case of guanxi, Journal of Management in Engineering33(1) (2017), Article ID 04016034.
59.
YanL. and ZhangL., Interplay of contractual governance and trust in improving construction project performance: dynamic perspective, Journal of Management Engineering36(4) (2020), Article ID 04020029.
60.
YoungR. and ChenW., The relationship between project governance mechanisms and project success, International journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2019.
61.
HerriottR.E. and FirestoneW.A., Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability, Education Research12(2) (1983), 14–19.
62.
MarquesR.C., Is arbitration the right way to settle conflicts in PPP arrangements, Journal of Management Engineering34(1) (2018), Article ID 05017007.
63.
Saorín-IborraM.C., Time pressure in acquisition negotiations:Its determinants and effects on parties’ negotiation behaviourchoice, International Business Review17(3) (2008), 285–309.
64.
LvJ., LinM., ZhouW. and Xu.M., How PPP Renegotiation Behaviors Evolve with Traffic Changes: Evolutionary Game Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management147(5) (2021), Article ID 04021032.
65.
HeX. and Su.Y., Flexibility and authority: resolving labor disputes in a county government in Western China, Law and Society Review53(4) (2019), 1341–1376.
