A new three-dimensional college performance assessment index system is established. The grey relational method is used to evaluate college performance in a university and the CRITIC method of variation coefficient is used to weight the assessment indices. The performance of 15 colleges in NH University are assessed by using the index system and the grey method, and the results can supply some important information for management optimization and resource distribution of NH University. It also shows that the index system and grey assessment model proposed in this paper have good potential to solve the similar problem.
GaitherG., and Others. Measuring Up: The Promises and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education, ERIC Digest [J]. 1995.
2.
QibiaoC. and GuohuiL., A review of American higher education performance assessment policies [J], Journal of Ningbo University (Education Science)26(03) (2004), 26–29.
3.
NanxingZ., ChunchunW. and ZhaohuiJ., Performance assessment on Higher Education Institutions: The Theoretical Thoughts about Practice [J], Educational Research36(06) (2015), 19–28.
4.
KellsH.R. and VanVughtF.A., (Eds.). Self-regulation, Self-study and Program Review in Higher Education. Culemborg: Lemma, 1998.
5.
ChangL.W., University resource allocation model and performance, Beijing Normal University Press, 2011.
6.
ShiyanL. and DehongG., The construction of the performance assessment index system of the secondary college of University [J], Journal of the State Education Administration College58(07) (2008), 60–63+79.
7.
KangT., The self-study: an internal assessment tradition of schools and departments at a western university [J], Teacher Education Research25(05) (2013), 92–96.
8.
JunfengL. and ChongP., Research on performance appraisal system of college departments based on key performance indicator [J], Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(social sciences edition)24(04) (2011), 111–114.
9.
GuifangY. and XianchunX., Research on three-dimensional assessment method of school performance of secondary colleges of higher education [J], Research on Higher Engineering Education169(02) (2018), 77–82.
10.
XiudiF., A pioneer trying of higher institutions management construction——practice and consideration of quality and efficiency assessment of colleges or departments on Tongji University [J], Assessment & Management13(01) (2007), 20–24.
11.
Xu-FengL.I., Kai-FuD., Zhi-QiongL., Zhi-FangW. and XiaZ., Construction of the performance assessment index system of college and department in the university [J], Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (social sciences edition)25(02) (2012), 277–279.
12.
HongZ., Performance assessment index system of secondary school of independent college [J], Operation and Management334(04) (2012), 121–124.
13.
KaipingC., Research on performance budget assessment system of in higher education [D], Shandong University, 2010.
14.
AhnT., et al., DEA and Ratio Efficiency Analyses for Public Institutions of Higher Learning in Texas J], Research in Governmental and Non-profit Accounting5(01) (1989), 165–185.
15.
XiudiF., Research on the assessment of the quality and performance of the internal departments of colleges and Universities –Taking Tongji University as an example [J], China Higher Education Assessment25(01) (2014), 3–7.
16.
GuojunW., YingX. and JianlongW., A study on the performance management research of professional colleges in universities from the vision of “double top” strategy——taking Lanzhou university as an example [J], Higher Education of Sciences136(01) (2017), 41–49.
17.
Zongmo KangkaiC. and HaishengZ., From “objective assessment” to “governance performance assessment” –A Study on the transformation of internal management paradigm in Chinese universities [J], Jiangsu Higher Education207(05) (2018), 22–25.
18.
TomkinsC. and GreenR.H., An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Efficiency of UK University Departments of Accounting [J], Financial Accountability and Management4(02) (1988), 147–164.
19.
JunmingY. and PingxinW., College performance assessment in higher education institutions based on data envelopment analysis [J], Management Review23(07) (2011), 108–115.
20.
BoW. and HuamingW., Construction of university performance assessment index system from the perspective of Balanced Scorecard [J], Accounting Communication583(35) (2012), 62–63.
21.
YingW. and ShenganS., Research on the construction and application of performance assessment model based on grey relational analysis [J], Friends of Accounting431(32) (2012), 22–25.
22.
XiaomingZ., JiahuiL. and GuopingW., Research on the assessment of performance value of colleges and departments [J], Jiangsu Higher Education215(01) (2019), 49–52.
23.
SifengL., YingjieY. and LifengW., Grey system theory and its application, Science Press, 2014.
24.
SahuS.K., DattaS. and MahapatraS.S., Appraisement and benchmarking of supply chain performance extent: A fuzzy grey relation method, Grey Systems: Theory and Application5(1) (2015), 2–30.
25.
EshtaiwiM.I., BadiI.A., AbdulshahedA.M., et al., Assessment of airport performance using the grey theory method A case study in Libya[J], Grey systems: Theory and Application7(3) (2017), 426–436.
26.
Yong, et al.,, A delay grey incidence analysis framework for assessing drivers and obstacles of R&D performance at Chinese universities [J], Grey Systems: Theory and Application8(1) (2018), 2–13.
27.
SuvvariA., SR.S.D. and GoyariP., Financial performance assessment using Grey relational analysis (GRA): An application to life insurance companies in India, Grey Systems: Theory and Application9(4) (2019), 502–516.
28.
ZhaoX., QuH. and HuangY., The study on key influencing factors of mergers and acquisitions performance based on China state-owned listed enterprises [J], Grey Systems Theory & Application6(1) (2016), 41–50.
29.
BradeaI. and MaracineV., Grey incidence between KPIs and hospital performance [J], Grey systems: Theory and Application5(2) (2015), 234–243.
30.
WangJ., et al., The Grey Correlation Analysis between Technology Readiness Level and Performance in Civil Aircraft, Journal of Grey System28(1) (2016), 109–117.
31.
WeiF., et al., Research on Performance assessment System for Green Supply Chain Management Based on the Context of Recycled Economy –Taking Guangxi’s Manufacturing Industry as Example, Journal of Grey System26(2) (2014), 177–187.
32.
Li-HuiC. and Chih-WenC., Identifying Key Performance Indicators of an Emerging Biotechnology and Medicine Enterprise: Grey Relational Analysis Application, Journal of Grey System24(4) (2012), 389–397.
33.
WangK.Y., Township recycling performance assessment based on fuzzy TOPSIS model: An empirical investigation using the artificial intelligence-based VIKOR approach[J], Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems40(4) (2021), 1–7.
34.
LiC., YangW., YuY., et al., Research on node importance evaluation of complex products based on three-parameter interval grey number grey relational model[J], Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems2021(1), 1–18.
35.
RanR. and WangB.J., Combining grey relational analysis and TOPSIS concepts for evaluating the technical innovation capability of high technology enterprises with fuzzy information[J], Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems29(4) (2015), 1301–1309.
36.
SUN Li—hua. The research of China’s Forestry Listed Companies Performance Evaluation Based on Grey Relational Model[J], Issues of Forestry Economics33(03) (2013), 283–28.
37.
DiakoulakiD., MarotasG. and PapayannakisL., Determining objective weights in multiple crireriaproblems: The CRITIC method [J], Computers and Operations Research22(7) (1995), 763–770.
