Nature-inspired algorithms as problem-solving methodologies are extremely effective in discovery of optimized solutions in multi-dimensional and multi-modal problems. Because of qualities like “self-optimization”, “flexibility” and etc., nature-inspired algorithms for problem solving are effectively optimal. Feature selection is an approach to find approximate optimal subset of the features which are more relevant towards the particular outcome. In this study, we focused on how feature selection may improve the credit scoring model’s performance for prediction. Nature-inspired algorithms are applied for feature selection to improve the predictive performance of the credit scoring model. Additionally, four benchmark credit scoring datasets collected from the UCI repository are used to test feature selection by several Nature-inspired algorithms aggregated with “Random Forest (RF)”, “Logistic Regression (LR),” and “Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP)” for classification and results are compared in terms of classification accuracy and G-measures.
DengS.XiangZ.ZhaoP.TaheriJ.GaoH.YinJ.ZomayaA.Y., Dynamical resource allocation in edge for trustableinternet-of-things systems: A reinforcement learning method, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics16(9) (2020), 6103–6113.
2.
EdlaD.R.TripathiD.CherukuR.KuppiliV., An efficientmulti-layer ensemble framework with bpsogsa-based feature selectionfor credit scoring data analysis, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering43(12) (2018), 6909–6928.
3.
FongS.Biuk-AghaiR.P.MillhamR.C. Swarm search methods in weka for data mining. In: Proceedings of the 2018 10th international conference on machine learning and computing (2018), pp. 122–127.
4.
GalletlyJ.E., An overview of genetic algorithms, Kybernetes21(6) (1992), 26–30.
5.
GeemZ.W.KimJ.H.LoganathanG.V., A new heuristicoptimization algorithm: Harmony search, Simulation76(2) (2001), 60–68.
6.
KarabogaD.OzturkC., Fuzzy clustering with artificial beecolony algorithm, Scientific Research and Essays5(14) (2010), 1899–1902.
MaldonadoS.WeberR.BasakJ., Simultaneous feature selectionand classification using kernel-penalized support vector machines, Information Sciences181(1) (2011), 115–128.
12.
MesterL.J.et alWhat’s the point of credit scoring? Businessreview, 3(Sep/Oct) (1997), 3–16.
13.
MirjaliliS.MirjaliliS.M.YangX.S., Binary bat algorithm, Neural Computing and Applications25 (2014), 663–681.
14.
MoraglioA.Di ChioC.PoliR. Geometric particle swarm optimisation. In: Genetic Programming: 10th European Conference, EuroGP 2007,Valencia, Spain, April 11–13, 2007. Proceedings 10. pp. 125–136. Springer (2007).
15.
PaleologoG.ElisseeffA.AntoniniG., Subagging for creditscoring models, European Journal of Operational Research201(2) (2010), 490–499.
16.
TeodorovićD. Bee colony optimization (bco). In: Innovations in swarm intelligence, pp. 39–60. Springer (2009).
17.
ThomasL.C.EdelmanD.B.CrookJ.N. Credit scoring and its applications. SIAM (2002).
18.
TripathiD.CherukuR.BablaniA. Relative performance evaluation of ensemble classification with feature reduction in credit scoring datasets. In: Advances in Machine Learning and Data Science, pp. 293–304. Springer (2018).
19.
TripathiD.EdlaD.R.CherukuR., Hybrid credit scoring modelusing neighborhood rough set and multi-layer ensembleclassification, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems34(3) (2018), 1543–1549.
20.
TripathiD.EdlaD.R.KuppiliV.BablaniA.DharavathCreditR., scoring model based on weighted voting and cluster basedfeature selection, Procedia Computer Science132(2018), 22–31.
21.
Van GestelT.BaesensB.SuykensJ.A.Van den PoelD.BaestaensD.E.WillekensM., Bayesian kernel based classification forfinancial distress detection, European Journal of OperationalResearch172(3) (2006), 979–1003.
22.
WangJ.HedarA.R.WangS.MaJ., Rough set and scatter searchmetaheuristic based feature selection for credit scoring, Expert Systems with Applications39(6) (2012), 6123–6128.
YangX.S. Firefly algorithms for multimodal optimization. In: International symposium on stochastic algorithms. pp. 169–178. Springer (2009).
25.
YangX.S.DebS., Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search, International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation1(4) (2010), 330–343.
26.
YangX.S.HeX., Bat algorithm: Literature review andapplications, International Journal of Bio-inspired Computation5(3) (2013), 141–149.
27.
YangX.S.HeX., Firefly algorithm: Recent advances andapplications, International Journal of Swarm Intelligence1(1) (2013), 36–50.
28.
ZhouL.LaiK.K.YenJ., Credit scoring models with aucmaximization based on weighted svm, International Journal ofInformation Technology & Decision Making8(04) (2009), 677–696.
29.
TianZ.FongS.TangR.DebS.WongR. Rhinoceros search algorithm. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI), 18–22 (2016).
30.
TripathiD.ShuklaA.K.ReddyB.R.BopcheG.S.ChandramohanD., Credit scoring models using ensemble learning andclassification approaches: A comprehensive survey, WirelessPersonal Communications (2022), 1–28.
31.
TripathiD.EdlaD.R.BablaniA.ShuklaA.K.ReddyB.R., Experimental analysis of machine learning methods for credit scoreclassification, Progress in Artificial Intelligence10(2021), 217–243.
32.
RosenblattF. Principles of neurodynamics. Perceptrons and the theory of brain mechanisms. Tech. rep., CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LAB INC BUFFALO NY (1961).
33.
RumelhartD.E.HintonG.E.WilliamsR.J. Learning internal representations by error propagation, Tech. rep., California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science (1985).
34.
BreimanL., Random forests, Machine Learning45(1) (2001), 5–32.
35.
FriedmanJ.HastieT.TibshiraniR. The elements of statistical learning, vol. 1. Springer series in statistics New York, NY, USA: (2001).
36.
Le CessieS.Van HouwelingenJ.C., Ridge estimators in logisticregression, Applied Statistics (1992), 191–201.
37.
TrevorH.RobertT.JeromeF. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2009).
