A well-structured and indexed database alleviates the computing burden on large data. This paper describes groundwork for presenting the data in a compact, distinctive form, improving the procedures of applying keypoint detection algorithms to preprocess and reduce the relevant features of the images. Our method computes for an image a number of SURF keypoints in a given interval, by adapting the threshold related to the Hessian matrix blob detector. This type of approach allows selecting the level of detail to use in image description and gives us control over the computing time. We named this method DENOL (Descriptor Number On Limits) and tested it on images from two datasets, UCID and an original image database which we propose, IIT_DB. Very good retrieval results and a significantly reduced computing time are achieved.
AgrawalP., SharmaT. and VermaN.K., Supervised approach for object identification using speeded up robust features, International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms15(2) (2020), 165–182.
2.
AlhijawiB. and KilaniY., The recommender system: A survey, International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms15(3) (2020), 229–251.
3.
AlsmadiM.K., Content-based image retrieval using color, shape and texture descriptors and features, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2020), 1–14.
4.
BaigF., MehmoodZ., RashidM., JavidM.A., RehmanA., SabaT. and AdnanA., Boosting the performance of the BoVW model using SURF–CoHOG-based sparse features with relevance feedback for CBIR, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering44(1) (2020), 99–118.
5.
BayH., EssA., TuytelaarsT. and Van GoolL., Speeded-up robust features (SURF), Computer vision and image understanding110(3) (2008), 346–359.
6.
BejinariuS.I., CostinH., RotaruF., LucaR., NiţăC.D. and
LazărC., Fireworks algorithm based image registration, Intern. Workshop Soft Computing Applications (2016), 509–523.
7.
ChenK. and HennebertJ., Content-based image retrieval with LIRe and SURF on a smartphone-based product image database, Mexican Conference on Pattern Recognition (2020), 231–240.
8.
ChhabraP., GargN.K. and KumarM., Content-based image retrieval system using ORB and SIFT features, Neural Computing and Applications32(7) (2020), 2725–2733.
9.
ElnemrH.A., Combining SURF and MSER along with color features for image retrieval system based on bag of visual words, J. Comput. Sci.12(4) (2016), 213–222.
10.
HajiM.S., AlkawazM.H., RehmanA. and SabaT., Content-based image retrieval: a deep look at features prospectus, International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics9(1) (2019), 14–38.
11.
HuuQ.N., VietD.C., ThuyQ.D.T., QuocT.N. and VanC.P., Graph-based semisupervised and manifold learning for image retrieval with SVM-based relevant feedback, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(1) (2019), 711–722.
12.
IgnatA. and PăvăloiI., Experiments on iris recognition using SURF descriptors, texture and a repetitive method, Procedia Computer Science176 (2020), 175–184.
13.
JainM. and SinghD., A survey on CBIR on the basis of different feature descriptor, British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science14(6) (2016), 1–13.
14.
JunejaK., VermaA., GoelS. and GoelS., A survey on recent image indexing and retrieval techniques for low-level feature extraction in CBIR systems, IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence & Communication Technology, Ghaziabad (2015), 67–72.
15.
LeeY.H. and KimY., Efficient image retrieval using advanced SURF and DCD on mobile platform, Multimedia Tools and Applications74(7) (2015), 2289–2299.
16.
LoweD.G., Object recognition from local scale-invariant features, Proc. VII-th IEEE Intern. Conf. on Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece2 (1999), 1150–1157.
17.
LoweD.G., Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints, Intern. J. Comp. Vision60(2) (2004), 91–110.
18.
MehmoodZ., RashidM., RehmanA., SabaT., DawoodH. and DawoodH., Effect of complementary visual words versus complementary features on clustering for effective content-based image search, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems35(5) (2018), 5421–5434.
19.
PăvăloiI. and
IgnatA., Iris image classification using SIFT features, Procedia Computer Science159 (2019), 241–250.
20.
PăvăloiI. and
IgnatA., Experiments on Iris Recognition Using Partially Occluded Images, in:
BalasV.,
JainL.,
BalasM.,
ShahbazovaS. (eds), Soft Computing Applications. SOFA 2018, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Cham1222 (2021), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52190-5_11
21.
SchaeferG. and StichM., UCID: An uncompressed color image database, Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia5307 (2004), 472–480.
22.
WangD., ZhaoH. and LiQ., An image retrieval method of mammary cancer based on convolutional neural network, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems38(1) (2020), 115–126.
23.
WassonV., An efficient content based image retrieval based on speeded up robust features (SURF) with optimization technique, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), (2017), 730–735.
24.
YangW.J., Wei-HauD., Pau-ChooC., Jar-FerrY. and Pi-HsiaH., Visual thing recognition with binary scale-invariant feature transform and support vector machine classifiers using color information, Engineering and Technology Intern. J. of Computer and Information Engineering11(6) (2017), 789–793.
