Disasters occur due to naturally stirring events like earthquake, floods, tsunamis, storms hurricanes, wildfire, and other geologic measures. Social media fake image posting influence is increasing day by day regarding the natural disasters. A natural disaster can result in the death or destruction of property, as well as economic damage, the severity of which is determined by the resilience of the affected population and the infrastructure available. Many researchers applied different machine learning approaches to detect and classification of natural disaster types, but these algorithms fail to identify fake labelling occurs on disaster events images. Furthermore, when many natural disaster events occur at a time then these systems couldn’t handle the classification process and fake labelling of images. Therefore, to tackle this problem I have proposed a FLIDND-MCN: Fake Label Image Detection of Natural Disaster types with Multi Model Convolutional Neural Network for multi-phormic natural disastrous events. The main purpose of this model is to provide accurate information regarding the multi-phormic natural disastrous events for emergency response decision making for a particular disaster. The proposed approach consists of multi models’ convolutional neural network (MMCNN) architecture. The dataset used for this purpose is publicly available and consists of 4,428 images of different natural disaster events. The evaluation of proposed model is measured in the terms of different statistical values such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and f1-score. The proposed model shows the accuracy value of 0.93 percent for fake label disastrous images detection which is higher as compared to the already proposed state-of-the-art models.
ImranM., CastilloC., DiazF. and ViewegS., Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)47(4) (2015), pp. 1–38.
2.
CastilloC.‘Big crisis data: social media in disasters and time-critical situations’ (Cambridge University Press, 2016.2016).
3.
ZhouL., WuX., XuZ. and FujitaH., Emergency decision making for natural disasters: An overview, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction27 (2018), pp. 567–576.
4.
ImranM., MitraP., SrivastavaJ. Cross-language domain adaptation for classifying crisis-related short messages, arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.05388, 2016.
5.
SaidN., AhmadK., RieglerM., PogorelovK., HassanL., AhmadN. and ConciN., Natural disasters detection in social media and satellite imagery: a survey, Multimedia Tools and Applications78(22) (2019), pp. 31267–31302.
6.
TuechJ.-J., GangloffA. and SchwarzL., Our challenge is to adapt the organization of our system to the six stages of the epidemic to go beyond the COVID-19 crisis, British Journal of Surgery107(7) (2020), pp. e189–e189.
7.
MurthyD., GrossA. and McGarryM., Visual social media and big data. Interpreting Instagram images posted on Twitter, Digital Culture & Society2(2) (2016), pp. 113–134.
8.
Tien BuiD., ShahabiH., ShirzadiA., ChapiK., AlizadehM., ChenW., MohammadiA., AhmadB.B., PanahiM., HongH., Landslide detection and susceptibility mapping by airsar data using support vector machine and index of entropy models in cameron highlands, malaysia, Remote Sensing10(10) (2018), pp. 1527.
9.
HartawanD.R., PurboyoT.W., SetianingsihC. Disaster victims detection system using convolutional neural network (CNN) method, in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book Disaster victims detection system using convolutional neural network (CNN) method (IEEE, 2019, edn.), pp. 105–111.
10.
CuiS., YinY., WangD., LiZ. and WangY., A stacking-based ensemble learning method for earthquake casualty prediction, Applied Soft Computing101 (2021), pp. 107038.
11.
TagarevT. and RatchevV., A taxonomy of crisis management functions, Sustainability12(12) (2020), pp. 5147.
12.
FroudeM.J. and PetleyD.N., Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences18(8) (2018), pp. 2161–2181.
13.
LøvholtF., SetiadiN.J., BirkmannJ., HarbitzC.B., BachC., FernandoN., KaiserG. and NadimF., Tsunami risk reduction–are we better prepared today than in ?International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction10 (2014), pp. 127–142.
14.
ToniniM., D’AndreaM., BiondiG., Degli EspostiS., TrucchiaA. and FiorucciP., A machine learning-based approach for wildfire susceptibility mapping. The case study of the Liguria region in Italy, Geosciences10(3) (2020), pp. 105.
15.
IslamA.R.M.T., TalukdarS., MahatoS., KunduS., EibekK.U., PhamQ.B., KuriqiA. and LinhN.T.T., Flood susceptibility modelling using advanced ensemble machine learning models, Geoscience Frontiers12(3) (2021), pp. 101075.
16.
KamilarisA., Prenafeta-BoldúF.X. Disaster monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles and deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.11805, 2018.
17.
TangC., ZhuQ., WuW., HuangW., HongC., NiuX. PLANET: improved convolutional neural networks with image enhancement for image classification, Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2020), 2020.
18.
GondalA.U., SadiqM.I., AliT., IrfanM., ShafA., AamirM., ShoaibM., GlowaczA., TadeusiewiczR. and KantochE., Real Time Multipurpose Smart Waste Classification Model for Efficient Recycling in Smart Cities Using Multilayer Convolutional Neural Network and Perceptron, Sensors21(14) (2021), pp. 4916.
19.
UlloS.L., LangenkampM.S., OikarinenT.P., DelRossoM.P., SebastianelliA., SicaS. Landslide geohazard assessment with convolutional neural networks using sentinel-2 imagery data, in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book Landslide geohazard assessment with convolutional neural networks using sentinel-2 imagery data’ (IEEE, 2019, edn.), pp. 9646–9649.
20.
VanL.P., De PraeterJ., Van WallendaelG., De CockJ., Van de WalleR., Machine learning for arbitrary downsizing of pre-encoded video in HEVC, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.):‘Book Machine learning for arbitrary downsizing of pre-encoded video in HEVC’ (IEEE, 2015, edn.), pp. 406–407.
21.
ZaidiT., SamyA., KocatürkM., AteşH.F., Learned vs. hand-crafted features for deep learning based aperiodic laboratory earthquake time-prediction, in Editor ^(Eds.):‘Book Learned vs. hand-crafted features for deep learning based aperiodic laboratory earthquake time-prediction(IEEE, 2020, edn.), pp. 1–4.
22.
DaiboM. ‘Toroidal vector-potential transformer ’, in Editor (Eds.):‘Book Toroidal vector-potential transformer’ (IEEE, 2017, edn.), pp. 1–4.
23.
SudhaS. Prediction of Earthquake Induced Landslide Using Deep Learning Models’, in Editor (Ed.)^Book Prediction of Earthquake Induced Landslide Using Deep Learning Models’ (IEEE, 2020, edn.), pp. 1–6.
24.
LiR., LuX., LiS., YangH., QiuJ., ZhangL. A Deep Learning Model for Earthquake Prediction, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.)Book DLEP: A Deep Learning Model for Earthquake Prediction’ (IEEE, 2020, edn.), pp. 1–8.
25.
YangJ., QuJ., MiQ. and LiQ., A CNN-LSTM Model for Tailings Dam Risk Prediction, IEEE Access8 (2020), pp. 206491–206502.
26.
MiauS. and HungW.-H., River flooding forecasting and anomaly detection based on deep learning, IEEE Access8 (2020), pp. 198384–198402.
27.
SuJ., LiaoJ., GuD., WangZ. and CaiG., Object Detection in Aerial Images Using a Multiscale Keypoint Detection Network, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing14 (2020), pp. 1389–1398.
28.
BandeS., SheteV.V. Smart flood disaster prediction system using IoT&neural networks, in Editor(Ed)^(Eds.): Book Smart flood disaster prediction system using IoT & neural networks’ (Ieee, 2017, edn.), pp. 189–194.
29.
JonyR.I., WoodleyA., RajA., PerrinD. Ensemble classification technique for water detection in satellite images, in Editor (Ed.)^(Eds.):‘Book Ensemble classification technique for water detection in satellite images’ (IEEE, 2018, edn.), pp. 1–8.
30.
AamirM., AliT., IrfanM., ShafA., AzamM.Z., GlowaczA., BrumercikF., GlowaczW., AlqhtaniS. and RahmanS., Natural disasters intensity analysis and classification based on multispectral images using multi-layered deep convolutional neural network, Sensors21(8) (2021), pp. 2648.
31.
AamirM., AliT., ShafA., IrfanM. and SaleemM.Q., ML-DCNNet: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Facial Expression Recognition and Intensity Estimation, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering45(12) (2020), pp. 10605–10620.
32.
Amezquita-SanchezJ., Valtierra-RodriguezM. and AdeliH., Current efforts for prediction and assessment of natural disasters: Earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, tornados, and floods, Scientia Iranica24(6) (2017), pp. 2645–2664.
33.
ZhangX.Y., LiX., LinX. The data mining technology of particle swarm optimization algorithm in earthquake prediction, in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book The data mining technology of particle swarm optimization algorithm in earthquake prediction’ (Trans Tech Publ, 2014, edn.), pp. 1570–1573.
34.
AdeliH. and PanakkatA., A probabilistic neural network for earthquake magnitude prediction, Neural Networks22(7) (2009), pp. 1018–1024.
35.
MerzB., KreibichH. and LallU., Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences13(1) (2013), pp. 53–64.
36.
VenkatesanM., ThangaveluA., PrabhavathyP.An improved Bayesian classification data mining method for early warning landslide susceptibility model using GIS, in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book An improved Bayesian classi-fication data mining method for early warning landslide susceptibility model using GIS’ (Springer, 2013, edn.), pp. 277–288.
37.
KorupO. and StolleA., Landslide prediction from machine learning, Geology Today30(1) (2014), pp. 26–33.
38.
Di SalvoR., MontaltoP.,NunnariG.,NeriM.,PuglisiG., Multivariate time series clustering on geophysical data recorded at Mt. Etna from 1996 to 2003, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research251 (2013), pp. 65–74.
39.
DasH.S., JungH. An efficient tool to assess risk of storm surges using data mining: ‘Coastal Hazards’ (2013), pp. 80–91.
40.
ChatfieldA.T., BrajawidagdaU. Twitter early tsunami warning system: A case study in Indonesia’ natural disaster management, in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book Twitter early tsunami warning system: A case study in Indonesia’s natural disaster management’ (IEEE, 2013, edn.), pp. 2050–2060.
41.
KhalafM., AlaskarH., HussainA.J., BakerT., MaamarZ., BuyyaR., LiatsisP., KhanW. and TawfikH., and Al-Jumeily, D.: ‘IoT-enabled flood severity prediction via ensemble machine learning models’, IEEE Access8 (2020), pp. 70375–70386.
42.
ZhaiC., ZhangS., CaoZ. and WangX., Learning-based prediction of wildfire spread with real-time rate of spread measurement, Combustion and Flame215 (2020), pp. 333–341.
43.
TanJ., ChenS. and WangJ., Western North Pacific tropical cyclone track forecasts by a machine learning model, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment35(6) (2021), pp. 1113–1126.
44.
LiuY.Y., LiL., LiuY.S., ChanP.W., ZhangW.H. and ZhangL., Estimation of precipitation induced by tropical cyclones based on machine-learning-enhanced analogue identification of numerical prediction, Meteorological Applications28(2) (2021), pp. e1978.
45.
NisaA.K., IrawanM.I., PratomoD.G.Identification of Potential Landslide Disaster in East Java Using Neural Network Model (Case Study: District of Ponogoro), in Editor (Ed.)∧(Eds.): ‘Book Identification of Potential Landslide Disaster in East Java Using Neural Network Model (Case Study: District of Ponogoro)’ (IOP Publishing, 2019, edn.), pp. 012095.
46.
BardaroC., BevignaniG., MantelliniI. and SeraciniM., Bivariate generalized exponential sampling series and applications to seismic waves, Constructive Mathematical Analysis2(4) (2019), pp. 153–167.
47.
SCHEMPPW.J., Congruence and metaplectic covariance: Rational biquadratic reciprocity and quantum entanglement, Constructive Mathematical Analysis4(1), pp. 61–80.
48.
FangZ., WangY., PengL. and HongH., A comparative study of heterogeneous ensemble-learning techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping, International Journal of Geographical Information Science35(2) (2021), pp. 321–347.
49.
DouJ., YunusA.P., BuiD.T., MerghadiA., SahanaM., ZhuZ., ChenC.-W., HanZ. and PhamB.T., ‘Improved landslide assessment using support vector machine with bagging, boosting, and stacking ensemble machine learning framework in a mountainous watershed, Japan’, Landslides17(3) (2020), pp. 641–658.
50.
JainN. and VirmaniD., Ensemble learning using fast rule based fuzzy K–means pre clustering and classification for aquatic behavior-extracted tsunami prediction, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences40(2) (2019), pp. 441–453.
51.
PhamB.T., PhongT.V., Nguyen-ThoiT., ParialK., SinghK.S., LyH.-B., NguyenK.T., HoL.S., LeH.V., PrakashI. Ensemble modeling of landslide susceptibility using random subspace learner and different decision tree classifiers, Geocarto International (2020), pp. 1–23.
52.
TehranyM.S., PradhanB. and JeburM.N., Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS, Journal of Hydrology512 (2014), pp. 332–343.
