The problem of bilateral matching of teams and scientific and technical talents is studied in new R&D institutions with different forms of uncertain assessment information. A decision method is proposed based on a combination of grey correlation and cloud model. The method firstly applies interval grey numbers to characterize uncertain assessment score information and cloud models to characterize uncertain linguistic assessment information; secondly, the two different pieces of information are converted into grey correlation coefficients by applying grey correlation analysis methods to the assessment values, so as to solve indicator weights, and assemble assessment data based on indicator weights and cloud models; finally, the bilateral matching model is constructed and the matching results are solved based on the cloud model data features and the dual objectives of maximum satisfaction and minimum uncertainty. The case analysis and method comparison show that the method is feasible and effective.
WanQ.C., YuanL. and TanZ.H., The impact of technology talent concentration, market competition and their interaction on innovation performance of high-tech industries, Soft Science8(1) (2021), 8–11.
2.
MaoY.H. and LiS.M., Quantification of regional innovation value of new R&D institutions and the path of enhancement–a perspective of industrial economic analysis based on Zhejiang University, Chinese University Technology Transfer6(1) (2021), 8–11.
3.
ZhanG.Y., LiuS., LiuY.X. and MaW.C., Evaluation of core competencies of new R&D institutions: an ecological niche posture perspective, Science and Technology Progress and Policy38(08) (2021), 136–144.
4.
JiangL. and ZhuJ.J., A dynamic grey target evaluation method with multiple reference points for new R&D institution performance, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems40(3) (2021), 3831–3847.
5.
HuangT. and FanY.P., The “Five Self” qualities of strategic scientific and technological talents–Inspiration from “the father of Chinese core” Deng Zhonghan, Talent Resources Development of China15(1) (2021), 95–96.
6.
GuoB.T., WangS.B., ShuaiB., WangJ.N. and HeY.M., Research on the performance evaluation system of new R&D institutions co-construction based on network hierarchy analysis, Science and Technology Management Research40(10) (2020), 72–79.
7.
XuY.L., YuanR.B. and WangJ.M., The construction and empirical study of high-end talent evaluation system from intelligence perspective, Journal of Modern Information38(07) (2018), 160–177.
8.
LiangD.C., HeX. and XuZ.S., Multi-attribute dynamic two-sided matching method of talent sharing market in incomplete preference ordinal environment, Applied Soft Computing93(1) (2020), 1–18.
9.
WangN., LiY.Z., DaiC.J. and ZammoriF., Decision-Making Approach of Two-Sided Matching of Supply and Demand of Logistics Service Based on the Uncertain Preference Ordinal, Mathematical Problems in Engineering10(1) (2020), 1–12.
10.
LeQ. and ZhuJ.G., Bilateral matching decision based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy number information, Operations Research and Management Science30(01) (2021), 57–62.
11.
ZhaoX.D., ZangY.Q. and SunW., Bilateral matching decision method based on interval hesitant fuzzy information bidirectional projection technique, Operations Research and Management Science26(07) (2017), 104–109.
12.
BiA.R., LuoZ.S., SunZ.Y. and ZhangX.S., Research on bilateral matching decision of language evaluation based on cloud model and prospect theory, Statistics & Information Forum35(11) (2020), 42–48.
13.
CaoY.S., LiuS.F., FangZ.G., ZengY.C. and WangH., A case-learning based extreme entropy mining model for objective weights of multilevel clustering indicators, Chinese Journal of Management Science27(02) (2019), 197–204.
14.
WuP., WuQ., ZhouL.G. and ChenH.Y., A hesitant fuzzy language TOPSIS decision making method based on multi-objective attribute weight optimization, Operations Research and Management Science30(06) (2021), 42–47.
15.
LiuP.D. and TengF., An extended probabilistic language multi-attribute group decision making method based on consensus model and ORESTE, Chinese Journal of Management Science29(03) (2021), 199–209.
16.
LiP. and ShenC.J., A Pythagorean fuzzy uncertain linguistic decision method based on Heronian mean operator, Chinese Journal of Management Science29(01) (2021), 217–225.
17.
WangR., LiD.F. and YuG.F., Research on bilateral matching decision method considering attribute association in heterogeneous information environment, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems38(4) (2020), 4779–4792.
18.
SunQ.H. and ZhangL.X., Bilateral Matching Model Between R & D Personnel and Project Manager Based on Ant Colony Optimization, Wireless Personal Communications8(4) (2021), 1–16.
19.
ChenX., WangJ., LiangH.M. and HanJ., Hesitant multi-attribute two-sided matching: A perspective based on prospect theory, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems36(6) (2019), 1–18.
20.
LiuL., ZhangR. and WangZ., Carbon emission reduction technology investment decision based on bilateral matching-dynamic game, Operations Research and Management Science29(08) (2020), 20–26.
21.
ZhangM.Y. and LiD.F., A bilateral matching decision method for IT software outsourcing based on regret theory, Science and Technology Management Research37(24) (2017), 207–214.
22.
JiangL. and ZhuJ.J., Science and technology talent matching and application considering two-way uncertain “demand-supply” association, Science and Technology Management Research38(22) (2018), 142–148.
23.
KanL.R. and ZhaoH.H., Grey bilateral fair matching decision model, Science and Technology Management Research37(22) (2017), 208–215.
24.
RenL. and RenM.L., A dynamic bilateral phi model for cloud manufacturing tasks based on learning and synergy effects, Chinese Journal of Management Science26(07) (2018), 63–70.
25.
KongD.C., JiangY.P. and LiuC.P., A decision method for large-scale one-to-many bilateral matching problems, Systems Engineering36(01) (2018), 153–158.
26.
TongH.G. and ZhuJ.J., New peer effect-based approach for service matching in Cloud Manufacturing under uncertain preferences, Applied Soft Computing Journal9(4) (2020), 1–10.
27.
PanT.H., PengJ.Y. and CheM.R., Evaluation of welfare level of residents after urban renewal based on multi-source data cloud model, Chongqing Social Sciences11(7) (2021), 66–80.
28.
WangJ.Q., LuP. and ZhangH.Y., Method of multi-criteria group decision-making based on cloud aggregation operators with linguistic information, Information Sciences274(1) (2014), 177–191.
29.
DiP., NiZ-C. and YinD.-L., A multi-attribute decision optimization algorithm based on cloud model and evidence theory, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice41(04) (2021), 1061–1070.
30.
XuJ.Z. and ZhaiJ.Q., Research on the evaluation of military-civilian integration innovation program based on cloud model-grey correlation analysis for cloud platform, Operations Research and Management Science30(7) (2021), 154–159.
31.
LiuG., ZhuJ.J. and LiuS.D., Research on the quality improvement method and application of group evaluation data based on grey correlation-cloud model, Operations Research and Management Science30(3) (2021), 144–150.
32.
ZhaoY.,
XuX.K. and
LiX.J., Vulnerability evaluation of water environment system in Jiangsu Province based on variable-weight gray cloud model, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin27(11) (2018), 2463–2471.
33.
YiY., TongH.G., ZhuJ.J. and LiuD., Research on student-school-enterprise dual tutor trilateral uncertainty matching method based on cloud model and grey correlation, Mathematics in Practice and Theory51(14) (2021), 48–63.
34.
LiuS.F., GuoT.B. and GuoD.Y., Grey system theory and its applications, Beijing: Science Press (2020).
35.
ZhaB.T., ZhengZ. and YuanH.L., Laser fuze specific target recognition based on grey system theory, Optik247(23) (2021), 1–14.
36.
WangS.W., WangP. and ZhangY.F., A prediction method for urban heat supply based on grey system theory, Sustainable Cities and Society52(1) (2019), 1–7.
37.
HosseR.S., BeckerU. and ManzH., Grey Systems Theory Time Series Prediction applied to Road Traffic Safety in Germany, Internatinal Federation of Automatic Control49(3) (2016), 231–236.
38.
MemonM.S., LeeY.H. and MariS.I., Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory, Expert Systems with Applications42(21) (2015), 7951–7959.
39.
MosesE., BaiS.J., SeyedaliM. and WangZ.H., Evaluation of human resource information systems using grey ordinal pairwise comparison MCDM methods, Expert Systems with Applications182(5) (2021), 1–17.
40.
JongJ.Y., RimC.H., SinC.M. and CholO.H., Comprehensive evaluation of marine waste heat recovery technologies based on Hierarchy-Grey correlation analysis, Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science4(4) (2019), 308–316.
41.
HuangY.S., ShenL. and LiuH., Grey relational analysis, principal component analysis and forecasting of carbon emissions based on long short-term memory in China, Journal of Cleaner Production209(1) (2018), 415–423.
42.
ZhuL.H., ZhaoC. and DaiJ., Prediction of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete based on grey correlation analysis, Construction and Building Materials273(1) (2021), 1–13.
43.
HanY.M., SongG.L. and XuW., Fault monitoring using novel adaptive kernel principal component analysis integrating grey relational analysis, Process Safety and Environmental Protection157(1) (2021), 397–410.
44.
LiH.H., ChenD.Y. and ToloS., Safety assessment of hydro-generating units using experiments and grey-entropy correlation analysis, Energy165(15) (2018), 222–234.
