Cardio vascular disease threatens human life with higher mortality rate. Therefore it is quite important to monitor. An arrhythmia is an abnormal heart beat and rhythm which causes the disease. The best tool to find the heart rhythm of heart is Electro Cardiogram (ECG) which provides information about the different types of arrhythmias. This paper aims at proposing an automatic framework by employing multi-domain features to classify ECG signals. Proposed work uses optimum method of feature selection to improvise the efficiency of the classification process. A hybrid optimization algorithm is used for feature selection and proposed to optimize the parameters of the existing Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Proposed hybrid optimization algorithm was developed using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Migration Modified Biogeography Based Optimization (MMBBO) algorithm. Algorithm provides an improved solution to the optimizing the parameters of ECG signals. Results are evaluated by implementing in MATLAB software and the performance is justified with comparative analysis. The proposed framework enhances the process of automatic prediction of various arrhythmias or rhythm abnormalities which performs in gaining better accuracy. For data sets, the average classification accuracy of this method is 97.89%. This result is an improvement of 4–5% over the comparison of other methods.
HesarH.D. and MohebbiM., An Adaptive Kalman Filter Bank for ECG Denoising, in IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics25(1) (2021), 13–21, 10.1109/JBHI.2020.2982935.
2.
JainS., BajajV. and KumarA., Efficient algorithm for classification of electrocardiogram beats based on artificial bee colony-based least-squares support vector machines classifier, Electronics Letters52.14 (2016), 1198–1200. DOI:10.1049/el.2016.1171.
3.
RaiMohan Hari and ChatterjeeKalyan,
A unique feature extraction using MRDWT for automatic classification of abnormal heartbeat from ECG big data with Multilayered Probabilistic Neural Network classifier, Applied Soft Computing72 (2018), 596–608, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.005.
4.
OrPerlman, et al., Atrial electrical activity detection using linear combination of 12-lead ECG signals, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering61.4 (2013), 1034–1043. DOI:10.1109/TBME.2013.2292930.
5.
SadaghiyanfamSafaand KuntalpMehmet, Comparing the Performances of PCA and LDA Transformations on PAF Patient Detection. In Proceedings of the 2018, 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Imaging, Signal Processing (ICBSP 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3288200.3288201.
6.
AnnamJ.R. and SurampudiB.R., Inter-patient heart-beat classification using complete ECG beat time series by alignment of R-peaks using SVM and decision rule, 2016 International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (IConSIP), 2016, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ICONSIP.2016.7857480.
7.
RajS. and RayK.C., ECG Signal Analysis Using DCT-Based DOST and PSO Optimized SVM, in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement66(3) (2017), 470–478, doi: 10.1109/TIM.2016.2642758.
8.
LinhT.H., OsowskiS. and StodoloskiM.L., On-line heart beatrecognition using Hermite polynomials and neuron-fuzzy network, IEEETrans. Instrum. Meas52(4) (2003), 1224–1231. DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2003.816841.
9.
RamkumarM., Ganesh BabuC., Vinoth KumarK., HepsibaD., ManjunathanA. and Sarath KumarR., ECG Cardiac arrhythmias Classification using DWT, ICA and MLP Neural Networks, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.1831 (2021), 1–13. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1831/1/012015.
10.
WangT., LuC., SunY., YangM., LiuC. and OuC., Automatic ECG classification using continuous wavelet transform and convolutional neural network, Entropy23(1) (2021), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23010119.
11.
HongqiangLi, et al., Arrhythmia classification based on multi-domain feature extraction for an ECG recognition system, Sensors16.10 (2016), 1744. DOI: 10.3390/s16101744.
12.
YildirimÖ., ECG beat detection and classification system using wavelet transform and online sequential ELM, Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology (2021), 1940008. Doi:10.1142/s0219519419400086.
MateoJ., Sánchez-MorlaEva M. and SantosJ.L., A new method for removal of powerline interference in ECG and EEG recordings, Computers & Electrical Engineering45 (2015), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.12.006
15.
ChenYongli and DuanHuilong, A QRS Complex Detection Algorithm Based on Mathematical Morphology and Envelope, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference (2005), 4654–4657, doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1615508.
DikerA., AvciD., AvciE. and GedikpinarM., A new technique for ECG signal classification genetic algorithm wavelet kernel extreme learning machine, Optik (2018), doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.11.065
18.
Hari MohanRai,
AnuragTrivedi and ShailjaShukla, ECG signal processing for abnormalities detection using multi-resolution wavelet transform and Artificial Neural Network classifier, Measurement46.9 (2013), 3238–3246. DOI:10.1016/j.measurement.2013.05.021.
19.
ReljinI., ObradovićZ., PopovićM.B. and MladenovV., New methods for analyzing complex biomedical systems and signals, Complexity2018 (2018), 1–3. doi:10.1155/2018/6405121.
20.
MartisRoshan Joy, Rajendra AcharyaU., MandanaK.M. and Ray Chandan ChakrabortyA.K., Cardiac decision making using higher order spectra, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control8.2 (2013), 193–203. DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2012.08.004.
21.
MalathiMurugesan,
KalaiselviKaliannan,
ShankarlalBalraj,
KokilaSingaram,
ThenmalarKaliannan and
Johny RenoaldAlbert, A hybrid deep learning model for effective segmentation and classification of lung nodules from CT images, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy System (2021), 1–13. DOI:10.3233/JIFS-212189.
22.
BakE., ChoiG. and PanS.B., ECG-based human identification system by temporal-amplitude combined feature vectors, in IEEE Access8 (2020), 42217–42230, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976688.
23.
Rodriguez JorgeR., GarcíaE.M., CórdobaR.T., BilaJ. and Mizera-PietraszkoJ., Adaptive Threshold, Wavelet and Hilbert Transform for QRS Detection in Electrocardiogram Signals. In: XhafaF., CaballéS., BarolliL., (EDS) Advances on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing. 3PGCIC 2017. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, Vol 13. (2018), Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69835-9_73
24.
JianboGao, et al., Denoising nonlinear time series by adaptive filtering and wavelet shrinkage: a comparison, IEEE Signal Processing Letters17.3 (2009), 237–240. DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2009.2037773
25.
LiH., WangX., ChenL., et al., Denoising and R-peak detection of electrocardiogram signal based on EMD and improved approximate envelope, Circuits Syst Signal Process33 (2014), 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-013-9691-3.
26.
DaamoucheAbdelhamid, HamamiLatifa,
AlajlanNaif and
MelganiFarid, A wavelet optimization approach for ECG signal classification, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control7(4) (2012), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2011.07.001
27.
Chun-ChengLin and YangChun-Min, Heartbeat classification using normalized RR intervals and morphological features, Mathematical Problems in Engineering2014 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/712474
28.
GaneshKumar R. and KumaraswamyY.S., Investigating cardiac arrhythmia in ECG using random forest classification, International Journal of Computer Applications37.4 (2012), 31–34. DOI:10.5120/4599-6557.
29.
SaibalDutta, AmitavaChatterjee and SugataMunshi, Correlation technique and least square support vector machine combine for frequency domain based ECG beat classification, Medical Engineering & Physics32(10) (2010), 1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.08.007
30.
KasturiwaleHemant P. and IngoleP.V., Component extraction of complex biomedical signals and performance analysis, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol3 (2012), 3544–3547. https://biostats.bepress.com/jhubiostat/paper246
31.
Roshan JoyMartis, et al., Cardiac decision making using higher order spectra, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control8.2 (2013), 193–203. DOI:10.1016/j.bspc.2012.08.004.
32.
GaetanoValenza, et al., Revealing real-time emotional responses: a personalized assessment based on heartbeat dynamics, Scientific Reports4 (2014), 4998. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04998.
33.
InduSaini, SinghDilbag and ArunKhosla, Electrocardiogram beat classification using empirical mode decomposition and multiclass directed acyclic graph support vector machine, Computers & Electrical Engineering40.5 (2014), 1774–1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.04.004
34.
KaliannanT., AlbertJ.R., BegamD.M. and MadhumathiP., Power quality improvement in modular multilevel inverter using for different multicarrier PWM, European Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science5(2) (2021), 19–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejece.2021.5.2.315
35.
HongqiangLi, et al., Arrhythmia classification based on multi-domain feature extraction for an ECG recognition system, Sensors16.10 (2016), 1744. Doi: 10.1177/0142331212460720.
36.
MehmetKorürek,
NizamAli, Clustering MIT-BIH arrhythmias with Ant Colony Optimization using time domain and PCA compressed wavelet coefficients, Digital Signal Processing20.4 (2010), 1050–1060. DOI:10.1016/j.dsp.2009.10.019.
37.
Rasmus SAndersen,
PeimankarAbdolrahman and
PuthusserypadySadasivan,
A deep learning approach for real-time detection of atrial fibrillation, Expert Systems with Applications115 (2019), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.011
38.
JonathanRubin, et al., Densely connected convolutional networks for detection of atrial fibrillation from short single-lead ECG recordings, Journal of Electro-Cardiology51.6 (2018), S18–S21. DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.08.008.
39.
Kiranyaz InceT. and GabboujM., Real-time patient-specific ECG classification by 1-D convolutional neural network, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering63(3) (2016), 664–675. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2468589.
40.
ZubairM., KimJ. and YoonC.W., An automated ECG beat classification system using convolutional neural networks, IEEE 6th International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (2016)). DOI:10.1109/ICITCS.2016.7740310.
41.
KumarK.S., YazdanpanahB. and KumarP.R., Removal of noise from electrocardiogram using digital FIR and IIR filters with various methods, 2015 International Conference on Communications and Signal Processing (ICCSP), Melmaruvathur, India (2015), 0157–0162, doi: 10.1109/ICCSP.2015.7322780.
42.
TorstenSchlurmann, The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectra to Analyse Embedded.” Rogue Waves 2000: Proceedings of a Workshop, Organized by Ifremer and Held in Brest, France, 29-30 November 2000, Within the Brest SeaTechWeek 2000. Vol. 32. Editions Quae, 2001.
43.
AlbertJohny Renoald, SharmaAditi, RajaniB., MishraAshish, SaxenaAnkur, NandagopalC. and MewadaShivlal, Investigation on load harmonic reduction through solar-power utilization in intermittent SSFI using particle swarm, genetic, and modified firefly optimization algorithms, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy System (2021), 1–17. DOI:10.3233/JIFS-212559.
44.
AlbertJ.R. and StonierA.A., Design and development of symmetrical super-lift DC– AC converter using firefly algorithm for solar-photovoltaic applications, IET Circuits Devices Syst14(3) (2020), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cds.2018.5292.
45.
GoldbergerA.L., AmaralL.A.N., GlassL., HausdorffJ.M., IvanovP.Ch., MarkR.G., MietusJ.E., MoodyG.B., PengC.-K. and StanleyH.E., PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals, Circulation101(23) (2000), e215–e220 [Circulation Electronic Pages; http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/23/e215.full]; http://www.physionet.org/physiobank/database/vfdb/.
46.
ThawkarShankar and IngolikarRanjana, Classification of masses in digital mammograms using Biogeography-based optimization technique, Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences32(10) (2020), 1140–1148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.01.004
47.
OualiMohammed Assam, GhanaiMouna and ChafaaKheireddine, A new type-2 fuzzy modelling and identification for electrophysiological signals: a comparison between PSO, BBO, FA and GA approaches, International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control29(2) (2018), 163–184.
48.
BhagyalakshmiVishwanath, Vittal PujeriRamchandra and Dundesh DevanagaviGeetha,
GB-SVNN: Genetic BAT assisted support vector neural network for arrhythmia classification using ECG signals, Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences33(1) (2021), 54–67, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2018.02.005.
49.
KirarA., BhaleraoS., VermaO.P. and AnsariI.A.Protecting ECG Signals with Hybrid Swarm Intelligence Algorithm. In: GargL., BasterrechS., BanerjeeC., SharmaT.K., (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare. Advanced Technologies and Societal Change. Springer, Singapore. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6265-2_4
