Satellite emergency mission scheduling scheme group decision making (SEMSSGDM) is a key part of satellite mission scheduling research. An appropriate evaluation model can provide a dependable and sustainable improvement and guide the functioning of emergency mission scheduling. Consequently, this research is devoted to proposing a novel decision-making method that employs a novel consensus model with hesitant fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic sets (HF2TLSs) to eliminate disagreements among satellite dispatchers and reach consensus in scheme decision-making. Within the novel method, it proposes a distance measurement function based on Hausdorff distance with HF2TLS to gauge the fit and similarity across satellite dispatchers. Additionally, a consensus reaching process (CRP) is designed to adjust the judgement of satellite dispatchers taking into account the trust degree to improve consensus. Within the selection process, a combination of the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and the MULTIplicative MOORA (MULTIMOORA) method is applied, where PSO is performed to improve the accuracy of information aggregation, and the MULTIMOORA method is used to develop the robustness of the selection results. Lastly, an applicative example validates the effectiveness of the method based on a mission scheduling intelligent decision simulation system.
XuX.H., DuZ.J. and ChenX.H., Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions, Decision Support Systems79 (2015), 150–160.
2.
XieK., ChenG., WuQ., LiuY. and WangP., Research on the group decision-making about emergency event based on network technology, Information Technology and Management12(2) (2011), 137–147.
3.
Herrera-ViedmaE., AlonsoS., ChiclanaF. and HerreraF., A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems15(5) (2007), 863–877.
4.
YuD., Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation under confidence levels, Applied Soft Computing19(6) (2014), 147–160.
5.
Herrera-ViedmaE., MartinezL., MataF. and Chiclana, A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations, Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on13(5) (2005), 644–658.
6.
LiuX.D., WangZ.W., ZhangS.T and GargH., An approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy risky multiattribute decision making with unknown probability information, International Journal of Intelligent Systems (2021).
7.
LiuX.D., WuJ., ZhangS.T., WangZ.W. and GargH., Extended cumulative residual entropy for emergency group decision-making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems (2021), 1–21.
8.
XuZ. and ChenJ., Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research184(1) (2008), 266–280.
9.
LiJ. and ZhangY.L., A novel algorithm for aggregating interval information of multistage decision making problems and its application, Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition)46(4) (2019), 439–444.
10.
FengX.Q., LiuQ.W. and WeiC.P., Hesitant fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic multiple attribute decision making method, Operations Research and Management Science027(001) (2018), 17–22.
11.
HerreraF. and MartinezL., A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems8(6) (2000), 746–752.
12.
RodriguezR.M., MartinezL. and HerreraF., Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems20(1) (2012), 109–119.
13.
TorraV., Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems25(6) (2010), 529–539.
14.
LiaoH.C., GuoX.J. and XuZ.S., A survey of decision making theory and methodologies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice37(001) (2017), 35–48.
15.
RodriguezR.M., RosaM., MartiNezL. and HerreraF., A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Information Sciences241 (2013), 28–42.
16.
JinF., ZhangY., GargH., LiuJ.P. and ChenJ., Evaluation of small and medium-sized enterprises¡– sustainable development with hesitant fuzzy linguistic group decision-making method, Applied Intelligence (2021), 1–21.
17.
KrishankumarR., RavichandranK.S., AggarwalM. and TyagiS.K., Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set with fuzzy confidence for solving group decision-making problems, Neural Computing and Applications32(4) (2020), 2879–2896.
18.
JinF., NiZ., PeiL., ChenH. and LiY., Goal programming approach to derive intuitionistic multiplicative weights based on intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations, International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics9(4) (2018), 641–650.
19.
KrishankumarR., RavichandranK.S., LiaoH. and KarS., An integrated decision framework for group decision-making with double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic information and unknown weights, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems13(1) (2020), 624–637.
20.
RodriguezR.M., MartiNezL. and HerreraF., A linguistic 2-tuple multicriteria decision making model dealing with hesitant linguistic information, In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Istanbul, Turkey (2015), 1–7.
21.
ButlerC.T. and RothsteinA., On conflict and consensus: A handbook on formal consensus decision making, Mountain View, CA: Creative Commons (2007).
22.
LiJ. and WangZ.X., A programming model for consistency and consensus in group decision making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations, International Journal of Fuzzy System20 (2018), 2399–2414.
23.
WuN., XuY., LiuX. and WangH.M., Water-energy-food nexus evaluation with a social network group decision making approach based on hesitant fuzzy preference relations, Applied Soft Computing93 (2020), Article 106363.
24.
XuZ., Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making, Omega33(3) (2005), 249–254.
25.
TaoZ., HanB., ChenH. and ZhuJ., A new version of distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and its application, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems34(3) (2018), 1801–1811.
26.
BegI. and RashidT., TOPSIS for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems28(12) (2013), 1162–1171.
27.
WangJ.Q., WangJ., ChenQ.H., ZhangH.Y. and ChenX.H., An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Information Sciences280 (2014), 338–351.
28.
WangJ.Q., WuJ.T., WangJ., ZhangH.Y. and ChenX.H., Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on the Hausdorff distance of hesitant fuzzy linguistic numbers, Soft Computing20(4) (2016), 1621–1633.
29.
PedryczW., ParkB.J. and OhS.K., The design of granular classifiers: a study in the synergy of interval calculus and fuzzy sets in Pattern Recognition, Pattern Recognit41 (2008), 3720–3735.
30.
WangL. and LiuJ.Q., Application of hypothesis testing on AHP and optimal selection of satellite system scheme, Systems Engineering and Electronics23(12) (2001), 49–52.
31.
WangL. and LiuJ.Q., Study on the compatibility in AHP and satellite system scheme optimization, Systems Engineering and Electronics024(002) (2002), 27–30.
32.
ZhaoY. and YiX.Q., Design and evaluation method for inter-satellite link scheme, Journal of Equipment Academy28(1) (2017), 74–80.
33.
XiangL., YangX., ZhangY. and YuX.G., Effectiveness evaluation for satellite system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy theory, Computer Simulation30(02) (2013), 55–61.
34.
MengJ., LiQ.M., ZhangH. and LiuF.Y., Effectiveness evaluation of reconnaissance satellite based on the ADC model, Computer Science36(6) (2009), 41–43.
35.
KennedyJ. and EberhartR., Particle swarm optimization, In: Proceedings of ICNN’95 – International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth (1995), 1942–1948.
36.
GarisH.D., Introduction to evolutionary computing, Evolutionary Computation12(2) (2003), 269–271.
37.
GargH. and RaniD., An efficient intuitionistic fuzzy multimoora approach based on novel aggregation operators for the assessment of solid waste management techniques, Applied Intelligence (2021), 1–34.
38.
BrauersW. and ZavadskasE.K., The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control and Cybernetics35(2) (2006), 445–469.
39.
BrauersW. and ZavadskasE.K., Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies, Ukio Technologinis Ir Ekonominis Vystymas16(1) (2010), 5–24.
40.
BrauersW. and ZavadskasE.K., Robustness of MULTIMOORA: a method for multi-objective optimization, Informatica23(1) (2012), 1–25.
41.
WuX.L., LiaoH.C. and XuZ.S., A Hafezalkotob and F. Herrera, Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: A multi-criteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved borda rule, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2018), 3688–3702.
42.
BaidyaJ., GargH., SahaA., MishraA.R. and DuttaD., Selection of third party reverses logistic providers: an approach of bcf-critic-multimoora using archimedean power aggregation operators, Complex & Intelligent Systems (1) (2021).
43.
HerreraF. and MartinezL., A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems8(6) (2000), 746–752.
44.
LiaoH., XuZ. and ZengX.J., Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making, Information Sciences271 (2014), 125–142.
45.
GeS.N., The methods of multi-attribute decision making based on 2-tuple, Dissertation, cQufu Normal University (2015).
46.
HuttenlocherD.P., KlandermanG.A. and RucklidgeW.J., Comparing images using the Hausdorff distance, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence15(9) (1993), 850–863.
47.
OlsonC.F., A probabilistic formulation for Hausdorff matching, In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE (1998), 150–156.
48.
PedryczW., ParkB.J. and OhS.K., The design of granular classifiers: A study in the synergy of interval calculus and fuzzy sets in Pattern Recognition, Pattern Recognition41(12) (2008), 3720–3735.
49.
ShiY. and EberhartR., Amodified particle swarm optimizer, In: 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (1998), 69–73.
50.
BrauersW. and ZavadskasE.K., MULTIMOORA optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property, Technological and Economic Development of Economy17(1) (2011), 174–188.
51.
ZhangZ.Q., GuoJ.E. and WangP., An AHP-based approach for evaluating mission planning efficiency of imaging satellites, Radio Engineering42(1) (2012), 36–39.
52.
WangL., WangY. and LiuX., Prioritized aggregation operators and correlated aggregation operators for hesitant 2-tuple linguistic variables, Symmetry10(2) (2018), 39.
53.
WangJ., WangJ.Q., ZhangH.Y. and ChenX.H., Multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems18(1) (2016), 81–97.
54.
XuY. and WangH., A group consensus decision support model for hesitant 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations with additive consistency, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(1) (2017), 41–54.
