VIKOR method for MCDM based on bipolar fuzzy soft β -covering based bipolar fuzzy rough set model and its application to site selection of solar power plant
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February 2, 2022
VIKOR method for MCDM based on bipolar fuzzy soft β -covering based bipolar fuzzy rough set model and its application to site selection of solar power plant
Bipolarity indicates the positive and negative aspects of a particular problem. The concept behind the bipolarity is that a huge range of human decision analysis is involved in bipolar subjective thoughts. The VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) which means multicriteria optimization and compromise solution, has already become a quite popular multi-criteria decision making tool for its computational simplicity and solution accuracy. In this article, we propose a hybrid model for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) based on bipolar fuzzy soft β-covering based bipolar fuzzy rough sets using VIKOR technique. It consists of a suitable redesign of the VIKOR approach so that it can use information with bipolar configurations. This method focuses on selecting and ranking from a set of feasible alternatives, and determines compromise solution for a problem with conflicting criteria to help the decision maker in reaching a final course of action. It determines the compromise ranking list based on the particular measure of closeness to the ideal solution. For illustration, the proposed technique is applied to a decision-making problems, namely, the selection of site for renewable energy project (solar power plant). A comparison of this method with another aggregation operator method and with the existing decision making algorithm Fuzzy VIKOR is also presented.
Akram ShumaizaM. and ArshadM., Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis,} }, 7 https://, Comp Appl Math39, 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8.
2.
J.C.R Alcantud, A novel algorithm for fuzzy soft set based decision making from multiobserver input parameter data set, Inf Fusion 29, (2016), 142–148.
3.
AtanassovK., TIntuitionistic fuzzy sets, , Fuzzy Set Syst20 (1986), 87–96.
4.
AshtianiM. and Abdollahi AzgomiM, Trust modeling based on a combination of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy VIKOR, , Soft Computing20 (2016), 399–421.
5.
AbdullahS., AslamM. and UllahK., Bipolar fuzzy soft sets and its applications in decision making problem, , Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Syst27 (2014), 729–742.
6.
AliM.I., A note on soft sets, rough sets and fuzzy soft sets, , Appl Soft Comput11 (2011), 3329–3332.
7.
BiswasR., On rough sets and fuzzy rough sets, , Bull Pol Acad Sci Math42 (1994), 345–349.
8.
BiswasR., On rough fuzzy sets, , Bull Pol Acad Sci Math42 (1994), 352–355.
9.
BonikowskiZ., BryniarskiE. and Wybraniec-SkardowskaU., Extensions and intentions in rough set thoery Inform, , Sci107 (1998), 149–167.
10.
CousoI. and DuboisD., Rough sets, coverings and incomplete information, , Fundam Inform108 (2011), 223–247.
11.
D’eerL. and CornelisC., A comprehensive study of fuzzy covering based rough set models: definitions, properties,1Interrelationships, , Fuzzy Sets Syst336 (2018), 1–26.
12.
D’eerL., CornelisC. and GodoL., Fuzzy neighborhood operators based on fuzzy coverings, , Fuzzy Sets Syst312 (2017), 17–35.
13.
DengT., ChenY., XuW. and DaiQ., A novel approach to fuzzy rough sets based on a fuzzy covering, , Inform Sci177 (2007), 2308–2326.
14.
DuboisD. and PradeH., Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets, , Int J Gen Syst17 (1990), 191–209.
15.
DuboisD. and PradeH., An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preferences, (8), Int J Intell Syst23 (2008), 866–877.
16.
HuangC., LinM. and XuZ., Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on distance measure and score function: its application in multicriteria decision making process, Knowledge and Information Systems (2020), 1–34.
17.
HwangC.L. and YoonK., Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Springer, Berlin, (1981).
18.
FengF., LiC., DavvazB. and AliM.I., Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach, (9), Soft Computing14 (2010), 899–911.
19.
FengT., ZhangS.P. and MiJ.S., The reduction and fusion of fuzzy covering systems based on the evidence theory, , Int J Approx Reason53 (2012), 87–103.
20.
JuY. and WangA., Extension of VIKOR method for multicriteria group decision making problem with linguistic information, , AppliedMathematicalModelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems37 (2013), 3112–3125.
21.
KayaT. and KahrarnanC., Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach, , Expert Systems with Applications38 (2011), 7326–7333.
22.
KongQ.Z. and WeiZ.X., Covering based fuzzy rough sets, , Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Syst26 (2015), 2405–2411.
23.
LeeK.M., Bipolar valued fuzzy sets and their operations,, Bangkok Thailand, Proc. Int. Conf. on Intell. Technologies (2000), 307–317basic.
24.
LiT.J., LeungY. and ZhangW.X., Generalized fuzzy rough approximation operators based on fuzzy coverings, , Int J Approx Reason48 (2008), 836–856.
25.
LiaoH.C. and XuZ.X., Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE, , J Intell Fuzzy Syst27 (2014), 1703–1717.
26.
LiJ., MeiC. and LvY., Incomplete decision contexts: approximate concept construction, rule acquisition and knowledge reduction, (1), Int J Approx Reason54 (2013), 149–165.
27.
LiZ., XieN. and WenG., Soft coverings and their parameter reductions, , Appl Soft Comput31 (2015), 48–60.
28.
LiuG.L. and SaiY., A comparison of two types of rough sets induced by coverings, , Int J Approx Reason50 (2009), 521–528.
29.
Le TénoJ.F. and MareschalB., An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products design with ill-defined data on environmental quality, , Eur J Oper Res109 (1998), 522–529.
30.
LinM., XuZ., ZhaiY. and YaoZ., Multi-attribute group decision-making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment, (2), Journal of the Operational Research Society69 (2018), 157–170.
31.
MaL., On some types of neighborhood-related covering rough sets, , Int J Approx Reason53 (2012), 901–911.
32.
MaL., Some twin approximation operators on covering approximation spaces, , Int J Approx Reason56 (2015), 59–70.
33.
MaL., Two fuzzy covering rough set models and their generalizations over fuzzy lattices, , Fuzzy Sets Syst294 (2016), 59–70.
34.
MaZ.M. and HuB.Q., Topological and lattice structures of L-fuzzy rough sets determined by lower and upper sets, , Inf Sci218 (2013), 194–204.
35.
MaX., LiuQ. and ZhanJ., A survey of decision making methods based on certain hybrid soft set models, Artif Intell Rev , 47 (2017), 507–530.
MalikN. and ShabirM., A consensus model based on rough bipolar fuzzy approximations, (4), Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Syst36 (2019), 3461–3470.
38.
MalikN. and ShabirM., Rough fuzzy bipolar soft sets and application in decision-making problems, , Soft Comput23 (2019), 1603–1614.
39.
MolodtsovD., Soft set theory-first results, , Comput Math Appl37 (1999), 19–31.
40.
NazM. and ShabirM., On fuzzy bipolar soft sets, their algebraic structures and applications, , J Intell Fuzzy Syst26 (2014), 1645–1656.
41.
OpricovicS., A fuzzy compromise solution for multicriteria problems, International Journal of Uncertainty, (3), Fuzziness and Knowlege-Based Systems15 (2007), 363–380.
PomykalaJ.A., Approximation operations in approximation space, , Bull Pol Acad Sci35 (1987), 653–662.
44.
RostamzadehR., GovindanK., EsmaeiliA. and SabaghiM., Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices, , Ecological Indicators49 (2014), 188–203.
45.
SunB.Z., ChenX., ZhangL. and MaW.M., Three-way decision making approach to conflict analysis and resolution using probabilistic rough set over two universes, , Inf Sci507 (2020), 809–822.
46.
SayadiM.K., HeydariM. and ShahanaghiK., Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers, , Applied Mathematical Modelling: Simulation and Computation for Engineering and Environmental Systems33 (2009), 2257–2262.
47.
TozluN., YükselŞ. and SimseklerT.H., A topological approach to soft covering approximation space, , Int J Math Trends Tech29 (2016), 33–38.
48.
E.C.C Tsang, D. Chen and D. Yeung, Approximations and reducts with covering generalized rough sets, , Comput Math Appl56 (2008), 279–289.
49.
WangC., ChenD., SunB. and HuQ., Communication between information systems with covering based rough sets, , Inf Sci216 (2012), 17–33.
50.
WanS.P., WangQ.Y. and DongJ.Y., The extended VIKOR method for multi-attribute group decision making with triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, , Knowledge-Based Systems52 (2013), 65–67.
51.
XuW.H., WangQ.R. and LuoS.Q., Multigranulation fuzzy rough sets, , Journal of Intelligent anf Fuzzy Syst26 (2014), 1323–1340.
52.
XuW. and ZhangW., Measuring roughness of generalized rough sets induced by a covering, , Fuzzy Sets Syst158 (2007), 2443–2455.
53.
YucenurG.N. and DemirelN.C., Group decision making process for insurance company selection problem with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment, (3), Expert Systems with Applications39 (2012), 3702–3707.
54.
YangB. and HuB., A fuzzy covering-based rough set model and its generalization over fuzzy lattice, , Inf Sci367 (2016), 463–486.
55.
YangB. and HuB., On some types of fuzzy covering-based rough sets, , Fuzzy Sets Syst312 (2017), 36–65.
56.
YaoY.Y., Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators, , Inf Sci101 (1998), 239–259.
57.
YaoY.Y., perspectives of granular computing, proceeding of 2005 IEEE Int. Conf.Granular computing (2005), 85–90.
58.
YaoY.Y. and YaoB., Covering based rough sets approximations, , Inf Sci200 (2012), 91–107.
59.
YükselŞ., ErgülZ.G. and TozluN., Soft covering based rough sets and their application, Sci World J, p 9 (Article 970893). (2014).
60.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, , Information and Control8 (1965), 338–353.
61.
ZakowskiW., Approximations in the (μ, π)-space, , Demonstr Math16 (1983), 761–769.
62.
ZhanJ., LiuQ. and HerawanT., A novel soft rough set: Soft rough hemirings and corresponding multicriteria group decision making, , Appl Soft Comput54 (2017), 393–402.
63.
ZhanJ. and ZhuK., Reviews on decision making methods based on (fuzzy) soft sets and rough soft sets, , J Intell Fuzzy Syst29 (2015), 1169–1176.
64.
ZhanJ. and ZhuK., A novel soft rough fuzzy set: Z-soft rough fuzzy ideals of hemirings and corresponding decision making, , Soft Comput21 (2017), 1923–1936.
65.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar fuzzy sets and relation: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis, In Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, 1994. Industrial Fuzzy control and intelligent systems conference and theNASAJointTechnology workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy logic, IEEE, (1994), 305–309.
66.
ZhangX., MeiC., ChenD. and LiJ., Feature selection in mixed data: a method using a novel fuzzy rough set-based information entropy, , Pattern Recogn56 (2016), 1–15.
67.
ZhangX.H., Fuzzy anti-grouped filters and fuzzy normal filters in pseudo-BCI algebras, , J Intell Fuzzy Syst33 (2017), 1767–1774.
68.
ZhangX.H., MiaoD., LiuC. and LeM., Constructive methods of rough approximation operators and multigranuation rough sets, , Knowl-Based Syst91 (2016), 114–125.
69.
ZhangL. and ZhanJ., Fuzzy soft β-covering based fuzzy rough sets and corresponding decision making applications, , International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10 (2019), 1487–1502.
70.
ZhanJ.M., SunB.Z. and AlcantudJ.C.R, Covering based multigranulation (I, T)-fuzzy rough set models and applications in multi-attribute group decision-making, 290— , Inf Sci476 (2019), 318.
71.
ZhanJ., JiangH. and YaoY., Three-way multi-attribute decision-making based on outranking relations, in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3007423.
72.
ZhanJ., YeJ., DingW. and LiuP., A novel three-way decision model based on utility theory in incomplete fuzzy decision systems, in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3078012.
73.
ZhangK., ZhanJ. and WuW., On multi-criteria decision-making method based on a fuzzy rough set model with fuzzy α-neighborhoods, in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3001670.
74.
ZhangK., ZhanJ.M., WuW.Z. and AlcantudJ., Fuzzy β-covering based (I, T)-fuzzy rough set models and applications to multiattribute decision-making, , Comput Ind Eng128 (2019), 605–621.
75.
ZhangK., ZhanJ.M. and YaoY.Y., TOPSIS method based on a fuzzy covering approximation space: an application to biological nano-materials selection, , Inf Sci502 (2019), 297–329.
76.
ZhaoZ., On some types of covering rough sets from topological points of view, , Int J Approx Reason68 (2016), 1–14.
77.
ZhuP., Covering rough set based on neighbourhood: an approach without using neighbourhoods, , Int J Approx Reason52 (2011), 461–472.
78.
ZhuW., Generalized rough sets based on relations, , Inf Sci177 (2007), 4997–5011.
