The main aims of this paper are to show that some results presented in [1] are erroneous. To this end, we provide some counterexamples to demonstrate our claim, and give the correct form of the incorrect results in [1]. Also, some improvements for the definition of accuracy measure is proposed. Furthermore, we show that the relationships given in the three figures need not be true in general, and determine the conditions under which they are correct. Finally, a medical application in the decision-making of the diagnosis of dengue fever is examined.
AtefM., KhalilA.M., LiS.-G., AzzamA. and El AtikA., Comparison of six types of rough approximations based on jneighborhood space and j-adhesion neighborhood space, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems39(3) (2020), 4515–4531.
2.
PawlakZ., Rough sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences11(5) (1982), 341–356.
3.
PawlakZ., Rough sets, Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht (1991).
4.
YaoY.Y., Two views of the theory of rough sets infinite universes, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning15 (1996), 291–317.
5.
AllamA.A., BakeirM.Y. and Abo-TablE.A., New approach for basic rough set concepts. In: International workshop on rough sets, fuzzy sets, data mining, and granular computing, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence3641, Springer, Regina, (2005), 64–73.
6.
AllamA.A., BakeirM.Y. and Abo-TablE.A., New approach for closure spaces by relations, Acta Mathematica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyiregyhiensis22 (2006), 285–304.
7.
Abd El-MonsefM.E., EmbabyO.A. and El-BablyM.K., Comparison between rough set approximations based on different topologies, International Journal of Granular Computing, Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems3(4) (2014), 292–305.
8.
AmerW.S., AbbasM.I. and El-BablyM.K., On j-near concepts in rough sets with some applications, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems32(1) (2017), 1089–1099.
9.
MaL., On some types of neighborhood-related covering rough sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning53 (2012), 901–911.
10.
NawarA.S., El-BablyM.K. and El-AtikA.A., Certain types of coverings based rough sets with application, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems39(3) (2020), 3085–3098.
11.
Abd El-MonsefM.E., KozaeA.M. and El-BablyM.K., On generalizing covering approximation space, Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society23(3) (2015), 535–545.
12.
Al-shamiT.M., An improvement of rough sets’ accuracy measure using containment neighborhoods with a medical application, Information Sciences569 (2021), 110–124.
13.
Al-shamiT.M., AlshammariI. and El-ShafeiM.E., A comparison of two types of rough approximations based on Nj-neighborhoods, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2021), DOI:10.3233/JIFS-210272
14.
Al-shamiT.M., FuW.Q. and Abo-TablE.A., New rough approximations based on E-neighborhoods, Complexity2021, Article ID 6666853.
15.
El-BablyM.K. and Al-shami, Different kinds of generalized rough sets based on neighborhoods with a medical application, International Journal of Biomathematics (2021), DOI:10.1142/S1793524521500868.
16.
HosnyR.A., AsaadB.A., AzzamA.A. and Al-shamiT.M., Various topologies generated from Ej-neighbourhoods via ideals, Complexity2021, Article ID 4149368, 11.
17.
KaliszewskiI., MiroforidisJ. and PodkopaevD., Interactive multiple criteria decision making based on preference driven evolutionary multiobjective optimization with controllable accuracy, European Journal of Operational Research216 (2012), 188–199.
18.
YaoY.Y., Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets, Information Sciences180(3) (2010), 341–353.
19.
YaoY.Y., Three-way decisions and cognitive computing, Cognitive Computation8(4) (2016), 543–554.
20.
YaoY.Y., Three-way decision and granular computing, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning103 (2018), 107–123.
21.
ZhanJ., JiangH. and YaoY., Three-way multiattribute decision-making based on outranking relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (2020). DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3007423
22.
ZhanJ., ZhangK. and WuW., An investigation on Wu-Leung multi-scale information systems and multi-expert group decision-making, Expert Systems with Applications170 (2021), 114542.
23.
ZhanJ., YeJ., DingW. and LiuP., A novel three-way decision model based on utility theory in incomplete fuzzy decision systems, in IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, (2021), DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3078012
24.
ZhanJ., CarlosJ. and AlcantudR., A novel type of soft rough covering and its application to multicriteria group decision making, Artificial Intelligence Review52(4) (2019), 2381–2410.
25.
NaumanM., AzamN. and YaoJ.T., A three-way decision making approach to malware analysis using probabilistic rough sets, Information Sciences374 (2016), 193–209.
26.
YeJ., ZhanJ. and XuZ., A novel decision making approach based on three-way decisions in fuzzy information systems, Information Sciences541 (2020), 362–390.
27.
ZhangK., ZhanJ. and WuW., On multi-criteria decisionmaking method based on a fuzzy rough set model with fuzzy a-neighborhoods, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (2020). DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3001670
28.
DengJ., ZhanJ. and WuW., A three-way decision methodology to multi-attribute decision-making in multi-scale decision information systems, Information Sciences568 (2021), 175–198.
29.
ZhangK., DaiJ. and ZhanJ., A new classification and ranking decision method based on three-way decision theory and TOPSIS models, Information Sciences568 (2021), 54–85.
30.
PrabhatA., et al., Myriad manifestations of dengue fever: Analysis in retrospect, International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health8(1) (2019), 6–9.
AzzamA.A., KhalilA.M. and LiS.-G., Medical applications via minimal topological structure, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems39(3) (2020), 4723–4730.
33.
DaiJ., GaoS. and ZhengG., Generalized rough set models determined by multiple neighborhoods generated from a similarity relation, Soft Computing22 (2018), 2081–2094.
34.
SalamaA.S.,
MhemdiA.,
ElbarbaryO.G. and
Al-shamiT.M., Topological approaches for rough continuous functions with applications, Complexity2021, 12.
