Metaphor plays an indispensable role in human life. Although sequence tagging models took advantage of linguistic theories of metaphor identification, the usage of metaphor in common words is not considered, when choosing the literal meaning of the target verbs. We present a novel approach to express the literal meaning subtly, combining the common usage and the inherent visualizability properties of words, termed GloVe embedding and visual embedding. Meanwhile, we import position information of the target verbs to gain the contextual meaning more accurately. Both two DNN models use these embeddings as inputs in this paper, which are inspired by two human metaphor identification procedures augmented with contextualized word representations (ELMo embedding). By testing on two public datasets, the results show improvement over previous state-of-the-art approaches. In addition, we also verify the universality of the approach by testing the examples that the target words were adjectives, adverbs, and nouns, and the results show the approach is applicable to the above three parts of speech.
ShutovaEkaterina., Design and evaluation of metaphor processing systems, Computational Linguistics41(4) (2016), 579–623.
4.
PeterT., YairN., DanA., et al., Literal and metaphorical sense identification through concrete and abstract context. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2011), pp. 680–690.
5.
IlanaH., RyanG., MaheshS., et al., Automatic extraction of linguistic metaphor with LDA topic modeling. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, (2013), pp. 58–66.
6.
YuliaT., LeonidB., et al., Metaphor detection with cross-lingual model transfer. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2014), pp. 248–258.
7.
HyejuJ., YohanJ., QinlanS., et al., Metaphor detection with topic transition, emotion and cognition in context. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2016), pp. 216–225.
8.
BeataB., CheeW. and MichaelF., Supervised word-level metaphor detection:experiments with concreteness and reweighting of examples. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, (2015), pp. 11–20.
9.
MarcS. and EduardH., Metaphor detection through term relevance. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, (2014), pp. 18–26.
10.
GeG., EunsolC., YejinC., et al., Neural metaphor detection in context. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, (2018), pp. 607–613.
11.
ChuhanW., FangzhaoW., YuboC., et al., Neural metaphor detecting with CNN-LSTM model. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, (2018), pp. 110–114.
12.
AlexG. and JürgenS., Framewise phoneme classification With bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures, Neural Networks18(5-6) (2005), 602–610.
13.
RuiM., ChenghuaL. and FrankG., End-to-End Sequential Metaphor Identification Inspired by Linguistic Theories. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (2019), pp. 3888-3898.
14.
JeffreyP., RichardS. and ChristopherM., GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, (2014), pp. 1532–1543.
15.
MatthewP., MarkN. and MohitI., Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (2018), pp. 2227–2237.
16.
BeataB., CheeW., EkaterinaS., et al., Semantic classifications for detection of verb metaphors. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2016), pp. 101-106.
17.
ShichaoS. and ZhipengX., BiLSTM-Based Models for Metaphor Detection, Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC2017 (2018), pp. 431–442.
18.
PragglejazG., MIP: A approachfor identifying metaphorically used words in discourse, Metaphor and Symbol22(1) (2007), 1–39.
19.
GerardJ., AlettaG., AnnaK., et al., A approach for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. volume 14. John Benjamins Publishing, Netherlands. 2010.
20.
YorickW., A preferential, pattern-seeking, semantics for natural language inference, Artificial Intelligence6(1) (1975), 53–74.
21.
GititK. and JamesP., Integrating visionand language datasets to measure word concreteness. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, (2017), pp. 103–108.
22.
GititK. and JamesP., Improving Neural Metaphor Detection with Visual Datasets. In: Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, (2020), pp. 5928–5933.
23.
ChangS., YingP., ShumanH., et al., A Metaphor Comprehension approach Based on Culture-Related Hierarchical Semantic Model,pp, Neural Processing Letters51 (2020), pp. 2807–2826.
24.
SaifM., EkaterinaS. and PeterT., Metaphor as a medium for emotion: An empirical study. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, (2016), pp. 23-33.
25.
CheeW., BeataB. and EkaterinaS., A report on the 2018 VUA metaphor detection shared task. In: Workshop on Figurative Language Processing, (2018), pp. 56–66.
26.
JoanB., WojciechZ., ArthurS., et al., Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphs, Computer Science. 2013.
