The purpose of this study is to develop an extension of CODAS method using picture fuzzy sets. In this respect, a new methodology is introduced to figure out how picture fuzzy numbers can be applied to CODAS method. COmbinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS) is a new MCDM method proposed by Ghorabaee et al. Picture fuzzy sets (PFSs) are a new extension of ordinary fuzzy sets for representing human’s judgments having possibility more than two answers such as yes, no, refusal and neutral. Compared with other studies, the proposed method integrates multi-criteria decision analysis with picture fuzzy uncertainty based on Euclidean and Taxicab distances and negative ideal solution. ERP system selection problem is handled as the application area of the developed method, picture fuzzy CODAS. Results indicate that the new proposed method finds meaningful rankings through picture fuzzy sets. Comparative analyzes show that the presented method gives successful and robust results for the solutions of MCDM problems under fuzziness.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8 (1965), 338–356.
2.
QiyasM., AbdullahS., AshrafS., KhanS. and KhanA., Triangular picture fuzzy linguistic induced ordered weighted aggregation operators and its application on decision making problems, Mathematical Foundations of Computing2(3) (2019), 183–201.
3.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
4.
AtanassovK.T. and GargovG., Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy-sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems31 (1989), 343–349.
5.
AtanassovK.T., Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems64 (1994), 159–174.
6.
YagerR.R., Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, Proceedings of Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, IEEE, 2013, 57–61.
7.
WangL. and LiN., Pythagorean fuzzy interaction power Bonferroni mean aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(1) (2020), 150–183.
8.
CuongB.C. and KreinovichV., Picture Fuzzy Sets – a new concept for computational intelligence problems, Proceedings of 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, IEEE, 2013, 1–6.
9.
KhanA.A., AshrafS., AbdullahS., QiyasM., LuoJ. and KhanS.U., Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in decision support system, Symmetry11 (2019), 383.
10.
ZhangK., ZhanJ., WuW.Z. and AlcantudJ.C.R., Fuzzy β-covering based-fuzzy rough set models and applications to multi-attribute decision making, Computers and Industrial Engineering128 (2019), 605–621.
11.
CuongB., Picture fuzzy sets-first results. part 1, in: Seminar “Neuro-Fuzzy Systems with Applications”, Institute of Mathematics Hanoi, 2013.
12.
AkramM., HabibA. and KoamA.N., A novel description on edge-regular q-rung picture fuzzy graphs with application, Symmetry11(4) (2019), 489.
13.
SinghP., Correlation coefficients for picture fuzzy sets,, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems28 (2015), 591–604.
14.
SonL.H., DPFCM: A novel distributed picture fuzzy clustering method on picture fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications42 (2015), 51–66.
15.
ThongN.T., HIFCF: An effective hybrid model between picture fuzzy clustering and intuitionistic fuzzy recommender systems for medical diagnosis, Expert Systems with Applications42(7) (2015), 3682–3701.
16.
CuongB.C. and HaiP.V., Some fuzzy logic operators for picture fuzzy sets, In Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), 2015, 132–137.
17.
CuongB.C., KreinovitchV. and NganR.T., A classification of representable t-norm operators for picture fuzzy sets, In Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), 2016, 19–24.
18.
PhongP.H., HieuD.T., NganR.T. and ThemP.T., Some compositions of picture fuzzy relations, Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Fundamental and Applied Information Technology Research (FAIR?), Thai Nguye, 2014, 19–40.
19.
ThongP.H. and SonL.H., A novel automatic picture fuzzy clustering method based on particle swarm optimization and picture composite cardinality, Knowledge-Based Systems109 (2016), 48–60.
20.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy cross-entropy for multiple attribute decision making problems, Journal of Business Economics and Management17 (2016), 491–502.
21.
GargH., Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering42(12) (2017), 5275–5290.
22.
SonL.H., Measuring analogousness in picture fuzzy sets: From picture distance measures to picture association measures, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making16 (2017), 359–378.
23.
SonL.H. and ThongP.H., Some novel hybrid forecast methods based on picture fuzzy clustering for weather nowcasting from satellite image sequences, Applied Intelligence46 (2017), 1–15.
JanaC., SenapatiT., PalM. and YagerR.R., Picture fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators: Application to MADM process, Applied Soft Computing74 (2018), 99–109.
26.
WeiG.W. and GaoH., The generalized dice similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications, Informatica29 (2018), 107–124.
27.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Fundamenta Informaticae157 (2018), 271–320.
28.
WeiG.W., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics9 (2018), 713–719.
29.
WeiG.W., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Picture 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Soft Computing22 (2018), 989–1002.
30.
WeiG.W., Picture uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Kybernetes46 (2017), 1777–1800.
31.
AshrafS., AbdullahS. and QadirA., Novel concept of cubic picture fuzzy set, Journal of New Theory24 (2018), 59–72.
32.
AshrafS., MahmoodT., AbdullahS. and KhanQ., Different approaches to multi-criteria group decision making problems for picture fuzzy environment, Bulletin of the Brazilian Mathematical Society, New Series50(2) (2019), 373–397.
33.
ZengS., AshrafS., ArifM. and AbdullahS., Application of exponential jensen picture fuzzy divergence measure in multi-criteria group decision making, Mathematics7 (2019), 191.
34.
WeiG., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics9(4) (2018), 713–719.
35.
NieR.X., WangJ.Q. and LiL., A shareholder voting method for proxy advisory firm selection based on 2-tuple linguistic picture preference relation, Applied Soft Computing60 (2017), 520–539.
36.
HoaN.D. and ThongP.H., Some improvements of fuzzy clustering algorithms using picture fuzzy sets and applications for geographic data clustering, VNU Journal of Science: Computer Science and Communication Engineering32(3) (2017).
37.
GhorabaeeK.M., ZavadskasE.K., TurskisZ. and AntuchevicieneJ., A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research50(3) (2016).
38.
GhorabaeeK.M., AmiriM., ZavadskasE.K., HooshmandR. and AntuchevicieneJ., Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation, Journal of Business Economics and Management18(1) (2017), 1–19.
39.
WeiG., Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making,, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 713–724.
40.
TeltumbdeA., A framework of evaluating ERP projects, International Journal of Production Research38 (2000), 4507–4520.
PanchalD., ChatterjeeP., ShuklaR.K., ChoudhuryT. and TamosaitieneJ., Integrated fuzzy AHP-CODAS framework for maintenance decision in urea fertilizer industry, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research51(3) (2017).
43.
Badi, BallemM. and ShetwanA., Site selection of desalination plant in Libya by using combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method, International Journal for Quality Research12(3) (2018).
44.
Badi, AbdulshahedA.M. and ShetwanA., A case study of supplier selection for a steelmaking company in Libya by using the Combinative Distance-based ASsessment (CODAS) model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(1) (2018), 1–12.
45.
BolturkE., Pythagorean fuzzy CODAS and its application to supplier selection in a manufacturing firm, Journal of Enterprise Information Management31(4) (2018), 550–564.
46.
BolturkE. and KahramanC., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method and its application to wave energy facility location selection problem,, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems35(4) (2018), 4865–4877.
47.
MathewM. and SahuS., Comparison of new multi-criteria decision making methods for material handling equipment selection, Management Science Letters8(3) (2018), 139–150.
48.
PengX. and GargH., Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in emergency decision making based on WDBA and CODAS with new information measure,, Computers & Industrial Engineering119 (2018), 439–452.
49.
PamučarD., BadiI., SanjaK. and ObradovićR., A novel approach for the selection of power-generation technology using a linguistic neutrosophic CODAS method: A case study in Libya, Energies11(9) (2018), 2489.
50.
YeniF.B. and ÖzçelikG., Interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS method for multi criteria group decision making problems, Group Decision and Negotiation28(2) (2019), 433–452.
51.
AdalıE.A. and TuşA., Hospital site selection with distance-based multi-criteria decision-making methods, International Journal of Healthcare Management, 2019, 1–11.
52.
KaraşanA., BoltürkE. and KahramanC., A novel neutrosophic CODAS method: selection among wind energy plant locations,, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems36(2) (2019), 1491–1504.
53.
Ijadi MaghsoodiA., PoursoltanP., AntuchevicieneJ. and TurskisZ., Dam construction material selection by implementing the integrated SWARA-CODAS approach with target-based attributes, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering19 (2019), 1194–1210.
54.
Ijadi MaghsoodiA., RasoulipanahH., LópezL.M., LiaoH. and ZavadskasE.K., Integrating interval-valued multi-granular 2-tuple linguistic BWM-CODAS approach with target-based attributes: Site selection for a construction project,, Computers & Industrial Engineering139 (2020), 106–147.
55.
YusufY., GunasekaranA. and AbthorpeM.S., Enterprise information systems project implementation: A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce, Journal of Production Economics87 (2004), 251–266.
56.
YaoY. and HeH.C., Data warehousing and the internet’s impact on ERP, IT Professional2(2) (2000), 37–41.
57.
GableG. and StewartG., SAP R/3 implementation issues for small to medium enterprises, AMCIS Proceedings, 1999, 269.
58.
SarkisJ. and SundarrajR.P., Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies,, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management30(3-4) (2000), 196–220.
59.
HongK.K. and KimY.G., The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective,, Information & Management40 (2002), 25–40.
60.
IllaX.B., FranchX. and PastorJ.A., Formalising ERP selection criteria, Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design, IEEE Computer Society, 2000, 115.
61.
LangenwalterG.A., Enterprise Resources Planning and beyond: Integrating your entire organization, St Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
62.
VervilleJ.C. and HalingtenA., A qualitative study of the influencing factors on the decision process for acquiring ERP software, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal5(3) (2002), 188–198.
63.
BakiB. and ÇakarK., Determining the ERP package-selecting criteria: The case of Turkish manufacturing companies, Business Process Management Journal11(1) (2005), 75–86.
64.
Lin and FordD.W., ERP selection for small and medium-sized manufactures, Proceedings International Conference of Manufacturing Research, 2004.
65.
WeiC., ChienC. and WangM.J., An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection, International Journal of Production Economics96(1) (2005), 47–62.
66.
BadriM.A, DavisD. and DavisD., A comprehensive 0–1 goal programming model for project selection, International Journal of Project Management19 (2001), 243–252.
67.
YenH.R. and SheuC., Aligning ERP implementation with competitive priorities of manufacturing firms: An exploratory study, International Journal of Production Economics92(3) (2004), 207–220.
68.
LiaoX.W., LiY. and LuB., A model for selecting an ERP system based on linguistic information processing, Information Systems32(7) (2007), 1005–1017.
69.
VatanseverK. and UluköyM., Determining enterprise resource planning systems through fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MOORA methods: An implementation on manufacturing sector, Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences11(2) (2013), 274–273.
70.
HindujaA. and PandeyM., An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach to select cloud-based ERP system for SMEs,, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making18(06) (2019), 1875–1908.
71.
WangL., PengJ. and WangJ., A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment, Journal of Cleaner Production191 (2018), 105–118.
72.
ZhangZ., KouX., YuW. and GaoY., Consistency improvement for fuzzy preference relations with self-confidence: An application in two-sided matching decision making, Journal of the Operational Research Society, (2020), 1–14.
73.
ZhangZ., GaoJ., GaoY. and YuW., Two-sided matching decision making with multi-granular hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and incomplete criteria weight information, Expert Systems with Applications168 (2021), 114311.
74.
SindhuM.S., RashidT. and KashifA., Modeling of linear programming and extended TOPSIS in decision making problem under the framework of picture fuzzy sets, PloS One14(8) (2019), 1–13.
75.
DahooeiJ.H., ZavadskasE.K., VanakiA.S., FiroozfarH.R. and GhorabaeeM.K., An evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems with new extension of CODAS (CODAS-IVIF), Economics and Management21(3) (2018), 171–188.
