A q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (q-ROFS) is more practical and powerful than intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) and Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) to model uncertainty in various decision-making problems. In this research article, we introduce the notion of q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher graphs (q-ROFHGs). We utilize the Hamacher operators because they are flexible and parameterized in decision making. We determine the energy of q-ROFHGs as well as the energy of splitting and shadow q-ROFHGs. In addition, we propose the Randić energy of q-ROFHG and its some substantial results. Further, we present the idea of q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher digraphs (q-ROFHDGs). We solve a decision-making numerical example related to the selection of best housing society for investment by calculating the energy and Randić energy of q-ROFHDGs and an algorithm to exhibit the applicability of the presented concepts in decision making. Finally, we present the conclusion.
AkramM. and NazS., Energy of Pythagorean fuzzy graphs with applications, Mathematics6(8) (2018), 136.
2.
AkramM., NazS. and DavvazB., Simplified interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy graphs with application, Complex and Intelligent Systems5(2) (2019), 229–253.
3.
AkramM. and ShahzadiG., A hybrid decision-making model under q-rung orthopair fuzzy Yager aggregation operators, Granular Computing (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00229-z.
4.
AkramM., HabibA. and KoamA.N., A novel description on edge-regular q-rung picture fuzzy graphs with application, Symmetry11(4) (2019), 489.
5.
AkramM. and HabibA., q-rung picture fuzzy graphs: a creative view on regularity with applications, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing61(1-2) (2019), 235–280.
6.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20(1) (1986), 87–96.
7.
AnjaliN. and MathewS., Energy of a fuzzy graph, Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics6(3) (2013), 455–465.
8.
BashaS.S. and KartheekE., Laplacian energy of an intuitionistic fuzzy graph, Indian Journal of Science and Technology8 (2015), 1–7.
9.
DarkoA.P. and LiangD., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence87 (2020), 103–259.
10.
GargH., Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-criteria decision making, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering42(12) (2017), 5275–5290.
11.
GargH., Distance and similarity measure for intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation and its application, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification7(2) (2017), 117–133.
12.
GutmanI., The energy of a graph. Ber Math Statist Sekt, Forsch-Ungszentram Graz103 (1978), 1–22.
13.
GutmanI., The energy of a graph: old and new results. In Algebraic Combinatorics and Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, (2001), 196–211.
14.
GutmanI. and ZhouB., Laplacian energy of a graph, Linear Algebra and its Applications414(1) (2006), 29–37.
15.
HabibA., AkramM. and FarooqA., q-rung orthopair fuzzy competition graphs with application in soil ecosystem, Mathematics7(1) (2019), 91.
16.
HamacherH., Uber logische Verkn-pfungen unscharfer Aussagen und deren zugeh?rige Bewertungsfunktionen, Progress in Cybernetics and Research3 (1978), 276–288.
17.
JiangH., ZhanJ., SunB. and AlcantudJ.C.R., An MADM approach to covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets: an application to medical diagnosis, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics11 (2020), 2181–2207.
18.
KaufmannA., Introduction a la Theorie des Sour-Ensembles Flous. Masson et Cie: Paris, France, 1973.
19.
KlementE.P., MesiarR. and PapE., Triangular norms, Springer Science and Business Media8 (2013).
20.
LinM., HuangC. and XuZ., TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient and entropy measure for linguistic pythagorean fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making, Complexity, (2019).
21.
LinM., HuangC. and XuZ., MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment, Sustainable Cities and Society53 (2020), 101873.
22.
LinM., LiX. and ChenL., Linguistic q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their interactional partitioned Heronian mean aggregation operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(2) (2020), 217–249.
23.
LinM., WangH. and XuZ., TODIM-based multi-criteria decision-making method with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Artificial Intelligence Review (2019), 1–25.
24.
LinM., WeiJ., XuZ. and ChenR., Multiattribute group decision-making based on linguistic pythagorean fuzzy interaction partitioned bonferroni mean aggregation operators, Complexity, (2018).
25.
YinS., LiH. and YangY., Product operations on q-rung orthopair fuzzy graphs, Symmetry11(4) (2019), 588.
26.
LiuP., ChenS.M. and WangP., Multiple-attribute group decision-making based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy power maclaurin symmetric mean operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, (2018).
27.
LiuP. and WangP., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multipleattribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems33(2) (2018), 259–280.
28.
LiuP. and WangP., Multiple-attribute decision-making based on Archimedean Bonferroni Operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy numbers, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems27(5) (2018), 834–848.
29.
MengerK., Statistical metrics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America28(12) (1942), 535–537.
30.
NazS., AshrafS. and AkramM., A novel approach to decision-making with Pythagorean fuzzy information, Mathematics6 (2018), 1–28.
31.
ParvathiR. and KarunambigaiM.G., Intuitionistic fuzzy graphs. In Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 139–150.
32.
Praba ChandrasekaranB.V.M. and DeepaG., Energy of an intuitionistic fuzzy graph, Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics32 (2014), 431–444.
33.
RosenfeldA., Fuzzy graphs, Fuzzy Sets and their Applications. Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S., Shimura, M., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, (1975), 77–95.
34.
SharbafS.R. and FayaziF., Laplacian energy of a fuzzy graph, Iranian Journal of Mathematical Chemistry5(1) (2014), 1–10.
35.
VaidyaS.K. and PopatK.M., Some new results on energy of graphs, Match Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistery77 (2017), 589–594.
36.
WangW. and LiuX., Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations, International Journal of Intelligent Systems26(11) (2011), 1049–1075.
37.
WeiG., GaoH. and WeiY., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems33(7) (2018), 1426–1458.
38.
WuS.J. and WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems21(3) (2017), 189–201.
YagerR.R., Pythagorean membership grades in multi-criteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22(4) (2014), 958–965.
42.
YagerR.R. and AbbasovA.M., Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers and decision making, International Jouranl of Intelligent System28(5) (2013), 436–452.
43.
YeJ., ZhanJ. and XuZ., A novel decision-making approach based on three-way decisions in fuzzy information systems, Information Sciences541 (2020), 362–390.
44.
YinS., LiH. and YangY., Product operations on q-Rung orthopair fuzzy graphs, Symmetry11(4) (2019), 588.
45.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3) (1965), 338–353.
46.
ZadehL.A., Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings, Information Sciences3(2) (1971), 177–200.
47.
ZhanJ., JiangH. and YaoY., Three-way multi-attribute decision-making based on outranking relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (2020), DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3007423
48.
ZhanJ., JiangH. and YaoY., Covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets with PROMETHEEEDAS methods, Information Sciences538 (2020), 314–336.
49.
ZhangK., ZhanJ. and WangX., TOPSIS-WAA method based on a covering-based fuzzy rough set: an application to rating problem, Information Sciences539 (2020), 397–421.
50.
ZhangK., ZhanJ. and WuW.Z., On multi-criteria decision-making method based on a fuzzy rough set model with fuzzy a-neighborhoods, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, (2020), DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3001670
51.
ZhangX. and XuZ., Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets, International Jouranl of Intelligent System29(12) (2014), 1061–1078.
