Technical and economic optimization of natural gas transmission network operation to balance node delivery flow rate and operation cost

Abstract

Natural gas transmission network is the major facility connecting the upstream gas sources and downstream consumers. In this paper, a multi-objective optimization model is built to find the optimum operation scheme of the natural gas transmission network. This model aims to balance two conflicting optimization objective named maximum a specified node delivery flow rate and minimum compressor station power consumption cost. The decision variables involve continuous and discrete variables, including node delivery flow rate, number of running compressors and their rotational speed. Besides, a series of equality and inequality constraints for nodes, pipelines and compressor stations are introduced to control the optimization results. Then, the developed optimization model is applied to a practical large tree-topology gas transmission network, which is 2,229 km in length with 7 compressor stations, 2 gas injection nodes and 20 gas delivery nodes. The ɛ-constraint method and GAMS/DICOPT solver are adopted to solve the bi-objective optimization model. The optimization result obtained is a set of Pareto optimal solutions. To verify the validity of the proposed method, the optimization results are compared with the actual operation scheme. Through the comparison of different Pareto optimal solutions, the variation law of objective functions and decision variables between different optimal solutions are clarified. Finally, sensitivity analyses are also performed to determine the influence of operating parameter changes on the optimization results.

Keywords

Natural gas transmission network operation optimization compressor station multi-objective optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ríos-Mercado

R.Z.

and Borraz-Sánchez

, Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review[J], Applied Energy 147 (2015), 536–555.

Zhou

, Zhou

, Liang

G.C.

and Peng

J.H.

, An MINLP model for network layout of underground natural gas storage[J], Journal Of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 38(4) (2020), 4619–4642.

Wei

L.X.

, Dong

, Zhao

and Zhou

, Optimization model establishment and optimization software development of gas field gathering and transmission pipeline network system[J], Journal Of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 31(4) (2016), 2375–2382.

Liu

E.B.

, Lv

L.X.

, Ma

and Zhang

, Steady-state optimization operation of the west–east gas pipeline[J], Advances in Mechanical Engineering 11(1) (2019), 1–14.

IEA. World Energy Outlook 2018[R].

BP. BP Energy Outlook: 2019 edition. 2019[R]. London, UK.

Tabkhi

, Optimization of gas transmission networks[D], Institut National Polytechnique De Toulouse (2007).

, Li

C.J.

, He

Y.F.

and Jia

W.L.

, Operation optimization of natural gas transmission pipelines based on stochastic optimization algorithms: A Review[J], Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (2018), 1–18.

Pfetsch

M.E.

, Fügenschuh

, Geißler

, et al., Validation of nominations in gas network optimization: models, methods, and solutions[J], Optimization Methods and Software 30(1) (2015), 15–53.

10.

Farahani

and Rezapour

, Logistics operations and management: concepts and models[M], Elsevier (2011).

11.

Wong

P.J.

and Larson

R.E.

, Optimization of natural-gas pipeline systems via dynamic programming[J], IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 13(5) (1968), 475–481.

12.

Percell

P.B.

and Ryan

M.J.

, Steady state optimization of gas pipeline network operation[C], In: 19th PSIG Annual Meeting, (1987).

13.

Wolf

D.D.

and Smeers

, The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm[J], Management Science 46(11) (2000), 1454–1465.

14.

Arya

and Honwad

, Modeling, Simulation, and Optimization of a High-Pressure Cross-Country Natural Gas Pipeline: Application of an Ant Colony Optimization Technique[J], Journal Of Pipeline Systems Engineering And Practice 7(1) (2016).

15.

Mohamadibaghmolaei

, Mahmoudy

, Jafari

, Mohamadibaghmolaei

and Tabkhi

, Assessing and optimization of pipeline system performance using intelligent systems[J], Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering 18 (2014), 64–76.

16.

Zhang

Z.W.

and Liu

X.T.

, Study on optimal operation of natural gas pipeline network based on improved genetic algorithm[J], Advances in Mechanical Engineering 9(8) (2017).

17.

Rodrguez

D.A.

, Oteiza

P.P.

and Brignole

N.B.

, Simulated annealing optimization for hydrocarbon pipeline networks[J], Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52(25) (2013), 8579–8588.

18.

Khanmirza

, Madoliat

and Pourfard

, Transient Optimization of Natural Gas Networks Using Intelligent Algorithms[J], Journal Of Energy Resources Technology-Transactions Of The ASME 141(3) (2019).

19.

Tran

T.H.

, French

, Ashman

and Kent

, Linepack planning models for gas transmission network under uncertainty[J], European Journal Of Operational Research 268(2) (2018), 688–702.

20.

Kazda

, Tomasgard

, Norstebo

and Li

, Optimal utilization of natural gas pipeline storage capacity under future supply uncertainty[J], Computers & Chemical Engineering (2020), 139.

21.

Zhang

X.R.

, Wu

C.C.

and Zuo

L.L.

, Minimizing fuel consumption of a gas pipeline in transient states by dynamic programming[J], Journal Of Natural Gas Science And Engineering 28 (2016), 193–203.

22.

Kazda

and Li

, Approximating Nonlinear Relationships for Optimal Operation of Natural Gas Transport Networks[J], Processes 6(10) (2018).

23.

Uster

and Dilaveroglu

, Optimization for design and operation of natural gas transmission networks[J], Applied Energy 133 (2014), 56–69.

24.

, Li

C.J.

, Jia

W.L.

and He

Y.F.

, Optimal operation of trunk natural gas pipelines via an inertia-adaptive particle swarm optimization algorithm[J], Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 21 (2014), 10–18.

25.

Alinia Kashani

A.H.

and Molaei

, Techno-economical and environmental optimization of natural gas network operation[J], Chemical Engineering Research and Design 92(11) (2014), 2106–2122.

26.

Demissie

, Zhu

W.H.

and Belachew

C.T.

, A multi-objective optimization model for gas pipeline operations[J], Computers and Chemical Engineering 100 (2017), 94–103.

27.

, Zio

, Zhang

J.J.

, Li

X.Y.

, Chi

L.X.

, Fan

and Zhang

Z.J.

, A method for the multi-objective optimization of the operation of natural gas pipeline networks considering supply reliability and operation efficiency[J], Computers & Chemical Engineering (2019), 131.

28.

Coelho

P.M.

and Pinho

, Considerations about equations for steady state flow in natural gas pipelines[J], Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 29(3) (2007), 262–273.

29.

Mokhatab

, Poe

W.A.

and Speight

J.G.

, Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing[M], Elsevier Ltd Oxford (2012).

30.

Sanaye

and Mahmoudimehr

, Minimization of fuel consumption in cyclic and non-cyclic natural gas transmission networks: Assessment of genetic algorithm optimization method as an alternative to non-sequential dynamic programing[J], Journal Of The Taiwan Institute Of Chemical Engineers 43(6) (2012), 904–917.

31.

Wang

Y.D.

, Shi

and Hu

Q.W.

, Dynamic multi-objective optimization for multi-period emergency logistics network[J], Journal Of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 37(6) (2019), 8471–8481.

32.

Torabi

, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

, Najafi

and Lotfi

F.H.

, Multi-objective interior search algorithm for optimization: A new multi-objective meta-heuristic algorithm[J], Journal Of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 35(3) (2018), 3307–3319.

33.

Alves

F.D.

, de Souza

J.N.M.

and Costa

A.L.H.

, Multi-objective design optimization of natural gas transmission networks[J], Computers and Chemical Engineering 93 (2016), 212–220.

34.

Rui

, Zhang

H.R.

, Gao

X.Y.

, Zhou

X.Y.

, Guo

Z.C.

, Liao

and Liang

Y.T.

, A multi-scenario and multi-objective scheduling optimization model for liquefied light hydrocarbon pipeline system[J], Chemical Engineering Research and Design 141 (2019), 566–579.