The data driven black-box or gray-box models like neural networks and fuzzy systems have some disadvantages, such as the high and uncertain dimensions and complex learning process. In this paper, we combine the Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy model with long-short term memory cells to overcome these disadvantages. This novel model takes the advantages of the interpretability of the fuzzy system and the good approximation ability of the long-short term memory cell. We propose a fast and stable learning algorithm for this model. Comparisons with others similar black-box and grey-box models are made, in order to observe the advantages of the proposal.
BlejM., AziziM., Comparison of mamdani-type and sugeno-type fuzzy inference systems for fuzzy real time scheduling, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research11(22) (2016), 11071–11075.
2.
JangJ.-S., Anfis: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics23(3) (1993), 665–685.
3.
SremacS., TanackovI., KopicM., RadovicD., ANFIS model for determining the economic order quantity, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(2) (2018), 81–92.
4.
StojcicM., AtjepanovicS., StjepanovicD., ANFIS model for the prediction of generated electricity of photovoltaic modules, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering2(1) (2019), 35–48.
5.
DongJ., WangY., YangG.-H., Output feedback fuzzy controller design with local nonlinear feedback laws for discretetime nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)40(6) (2010), 144–41459.
6.
KabziskiJ., KacerkaJ., Tsk fuzzy modeling with nonlinear consequences, in IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations Springer (2014), pp. 498–507.
7.
BenÃ-tezJ.M., CastroJ.L., RequenaI., Are artificial neural networks black boxes?IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks8(5) (1997), 1156–1164.
8.
BabukaR., VerbruggenH., Neuro-fuzzy methods for nonlinear system identification, Annual Reviews in Control27(1) (2003), 73–85.
GanjefarS., TofighiM., Single-hidden-layer fuzzy recurrent wavelet neural network: Applications to function approximation and system identification, Information Sciences294 (2015), 269–285.
11.
Yu Jose de Jesus RubioW., Recurrent neural networks training with stable bounding ellipsoid algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks20(6) (2009), 983–991.
12.
ChungJ., GulcehreC., ChoK., BengioY., Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555, (2014).
HochreiterS., SchmidhuberJ., Long short-term memory, Neural Computation9(8) (1997), 1735–1780.
15.
OgunmoluO., GuX., JiangS., GansN., Nonlinear systems identification using deep dynamic neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.01439, (2016).
16.
WangY., A new concept using lstm neural networks for dynamic system identification, in 2017 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, (2017), pp. 5324–5329.
17.
NicolaF., FujimotoY., OboeR., A lstm neural network applied to mobile robots path planning, in 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE, (2018), pp. 349–354.
18.
LiuY., ZhouY., LiX., Attitude estimation of unmanned aerial vehicle based on lstm neural network, in 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, (2018), pp. 1–6.
19.
ErgenT., KozatS.S., Effcient online learning algorithms based on lstm neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems29(8) (2017), 3772–3783.
20.
AvilesA.I., AlsalehS.M., MontsenyE., SobrevillaP., CasalsA., A deep-neuro-fuzzy approach for estimating the interaction forces in robotic surgery, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE). IEEE, (2016), pp. 1113–1119.
21.
SangH., YangC., LiuF., YunJ., JinG., A fuzzy neural network sliding mode controller for vibration suppression in robotically assisted minimally invasive surgery, The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery12(4) (2016), 670–679.
22.
SriH.M., RaoP., KammardiP.K., ShekarS.S., KathavateS., GowrangaK., A smart adaptive lstm technique for electrical load forecasting at source, in 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT). IEEE, (2017), pp. 1717–1721.
23.
SastryP., SantharamG., UnnikrishnanK., Memory neuron networks for identification and control of dynamical systems, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks5(2) (1994), 306–319.
24.
ChaudharyR., PatelH., ScholarM., A survey on backpropagation algorithm for neural networks, Int J Technol Res Eng2(7) (2015).
25.
JaegerH., Tutorial on training recurrent neural networks, covering BPPT, RTRL, EKF and the echo state network approach, GMD-Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik Bonn5 (2002).
26.
LiptonZ.C., BerkowitzJ., ElkanC., A critical review of recurrent neural networks for sequence learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019, (2015).
27.
YuW., Nonlinear system identification using discrete-time recurrent neural networks with stable learning algorithms, Information Sciences158(1) (2004), 131–147.
28.
WangL.X., Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall (1994).
29.
NarendraK.S., MukhopadhyayS., Adaptive Control Using Neural Networks and Approximate Models, IEEE Trans Neural Networks8 (3) (1997), 475–485.
30.
YuW., LiX., Fuzzy identification using fuzzy neural networks with stable learning algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems12(3) (2004), 411–420.
31.
ShihabudheenK., PillaiG., Recent advances in neuro-fuzzy system: A survey, Knowledge Based Systems152 (2018), 136–162.
