Floods are a climatic phenomena that affect different regions worldwide and that produces both human and material losses; for example in 2017, six of the worst floods were the cause of 3.273 deaths worldwide. In Colombia, the strong winter wave presented between 2010 and 2011, caused 1,374 deaths and 1,016 missing persons. The main river in Colombia is the Magdalena, which provides great benefits to the country but is also susceptible to flooding. This article presents a proposal to optimize a fuzzy system to prevent flooding in homes adjacent to areas of risk to the Magdalena River. The method used is based on evolutionary algorithms to perform a global search, including a gradient-based algorithm to improve the solution obtained. The best result achieved was the Mean Square Error (MSE) of 7, 83E - 05. As a conclusion, it is needed to employ optimization methods for the adjustment of parameters of the fuzzy system when considering that the sets and the rules are systematically obtained.
MejíaL.F., Índice Mundial de Riesgos de Desastres en Colombia, Departamento Nacional de Planeación Gobierno de Colombia, (2018).
3.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), Índice Mundial Valoración de daños y pérdidas: ola invernal en Colombia 2010–2011, CEPAL y BID, (2013).
4.
KarkiA., Text message alerts prove life saver in flood-hit nepal, Reuters (2017).
5.
PefferG., Integrated decision support systemfor risk assessment and management of the water-sediment-soil system at river basin scale in fluvial ecosystems, European Commission (2009).
6.
ChávezE.M., ArguelloA.M., ViscarraC.P., AroG.L. and AlbarrasínM.V., Inteligencia Artificial en la toma de decisiones gerenciales, Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, año 6 (especial), (2018), 1–12.
7.
Universidad de Catalunya, Diseño y Aplicación de un Sistema de Información para Ejecutivos, Vol. 01, (2010).
8.
ZamoraA.P., Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en la inversión de campañas publicitarias Application of artificial intelligent in the investment of advertising campaigns,a e Innovación, Revista de Ciencia Tecnolog’i4(3) (2017), 312–322.
9.
FernándezJ.A., MartínQ.M. and RodríguezJ.M.C., Business Intelligence Expert System on SOX Compliance over the Purchase Orders Creation Process, Intelligent Information Management5(3) (2013), 49–72.
10.
LópezA. and MartínezN., Ontología para la clasificación del riesgo de crédito en el Banco Nacional de Cuba Ontology to credit risk classification in the National Bank of Cuba,fica de la Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas, Serie Cient’i8(1) (2015), 17–31.
11.
PeñaJ.J., ChanA.O. and BalamC.C., Sistema Experto En Apoyo A Toma De Decisiones Para Aprobación De Líneas De Crédito, Pistas Educativas39(04) (2017), 402–411.
12.
LarrañagaJ.M., ZuluetaE., ElizagarateF. and BernardoJ.A., Algoritmos Meméticos En Problemas De Investigación Operativa, Revista de Dirección y Administración de Empresas (18) (2011), 189–208.
13.
TorresS., LugoJ.A., PiñeroP.Y., TorresK.M., PerdomoA., CuzaB. and AldanaM.L., Técnicas formales y de inteligencia artificial para la gestión de recursos humanos en proyectos informáticos,ticas, Revista Cubana de Ciencias Inform’a8(3) (2014), 41–52.
14.
CarvajalL.F., Un Modelo De Gestión De La Calidad Y Cantidad De Agua Con Lógica Difusa Gris Para El Río Aburrá,as Universidad de Medellín, Revista Ingenier’i12(22) (2013), 33–44.
15.
HernándezE.J., DuqueN.D. and MorenoJ., Generación de pronósticos para la precipitación diaria en una serie de tiempo de datos meteorológicos, Ingenio Magno (2016), 144–155.
16.
ChoiC., KimJ., HanH., HanD. and KimH.S., Water (Switzerland), Development of Water Level Prediction Models Using Machine Learning in Wetlands: A Case Study of Upo Wetland in South Korea12(93) (2020).
17.
OchoaA.J., OrellanaA., SánchezY. and DávilaF., Web component for the analysis of clinical information using the technique of clustering data mining,tica Médica, Revista Cubana de Inform’a6(1) (2014), 5–16.
18.
BadaraccoN., MariñoS. and AlfonzoP., Modelización De La Asignación De Aulas Con Técnicas Simbólicas De La IA Como Ayuda A La Toma De Decisiones,nica de Estudios Telemáticos, Revista Electr’o13(2) (2014), 16–35.
19.
KeongK., MustafaM., MohammadA., SulaimanM. and AbdullahN., Artificial neural network flood prediction for sungai isap residence, IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), (2016), 236–241.
20.
TruatmorakaP., WarapornN. and SuphachotiwatanaD., Water level prediction model using back propagation neural network: Case study: The lower of chao phraya basin, 4th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI), (2016), 200–205.
21.
HernandezJ., AsquiG., ArellanoA. and CunalataC., Multistepahead Streamow and Reservoir Level Prediction Using ANNs for Production Planning in Hydroelectric Stations, 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (2017), 479–484.
22.
LiY., ShiH. and LiuH., A hybrid model for river water level forecasting: Cases of Xiangjiang River and Yuanjiang River, China, Journal of Hydrology587 (2020), 124934.
23.
RenT., LiuX., NiuJ., LeiX. and ZhangZ., Real-time water level prediction of cascaded channels based on multilayer perception and recurrent neural network, Journal of Hydrology585 (2020), 124783.
24.
WeissJ., BernardaraP., AndreewskyM. and BenoitM., Seasonal autoregressive modeling of a skew storm surge series, Ocean Modelling47 (2012), 41–54.
25.
LohaniA.K., KumarR. and SinghR.D., Hydrological time series modeling: A comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy, neural network and autoregressive techniques, Journal of Hydrology442–443 (2012), 23–35.
26.
ChuaL.H.C. and WongT.S.W., Runoff forecasting for an asphalt plane by Artificial Neural Networks and comparisons with kinematic wave and autoregressive moving average models, Journal of Hydrology397(3-4) (2011), 191–201.
27.
RuslanF.A., SamadA.M., TajjudinM. and AdnanR., 7 hours flood prediction modelling using NNARX structure: Case study Terengganu, 2016 IEEE 12th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA), Malacca City (2016), 263–268.
28.
ZhangS., LuL., YuJ. and ZhouH., Short-term water level prediction using different artificial intelligent models, Fifth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), (2016), 1–6.
29.
WangH., YunR., ZhaoR. and QiZ., Flash flood risk evaluation based on variable fuzzy method and fuzzy clustering analysis, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(4) (2019), 4861–4871.
30.
DarabiH., ChoubinB., RahmatiO., TorabiA., PradhanB. and KløveB., Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques, Journal of Hydrology569 (2019), 142–154.
31.
PereraE.D.P. and LahatL., Fuzzy logic based flood forecasting model for the Kelantan River basin, Malaysia, Journal of Hydro-Environment Research9(4) (2015), 542–553.
32.
JayawardenaA.W., PereraE.D.P., ZhuB., AmarasekaraJ.D. and VereivaluV., A comparative study of fuzzy logic systems approach for river discharge prediction, Journal of Hydrology514 (2014), 85–101.
33.
SupaniA., WidodoS. and AgustinM., A flood early warning system design based on water level using fuzzy logic and short message service gateway, Advanced Science Letters23(3) (2017), 2257–2259.
34.
BarragánA.J., Al-HadithiB.M., JiménezA. and AndújarJ.M., A general methodology for online TS fuzzy modeling by the extended Kalman filter, Applied Soft Computing Journal18 (2014), 277–289.
35.
VafamandN., ArefiM.M. and KhayatianA., Nonlinear system identification based on Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy modeling and unscented Kalman filter, ISA Transactions74 (2016), 134–143.
36.
MardaniM.M., ShasadeghiM., SafarinejadianB. and DragiĉevićT., Online distributed fuzzy modeling of nonlinear PDE systems: Computation based on adaptive algorithms, Applied Soft Computing Journal77 (2019), 76–87.
37.
TungW.L. and QuekC., A Mamdani-Takagi-Sugeno based Linguistic Neural-Fuzzy Inference System for Improved Interpretability-Accuracy Representation, IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (2019), 367–372.
38.
WolfsV. and WillemsP., A data driven approach using Takagi-Sugeno models for computationally efficient lumped floodplain modelling, Journal of Hydrology503 (2013), 222–232.
39.
SilverM., SvorayT., KarnieliA. and FredjE., Improving weather radar precipitation maps: A fuzzy logic approach, Atmospheric Research234 (2020), 104710.
40.
BuiD.T., PradhanB., NampakH., BuiQ.T., TranQ.A. and NguyenQ.P., Hybrid artificial intelligence approach based on neural fuzzy inference model and metaheuristic optimization for flood susceptibilitgy modeling in a high-frequency tropical cyclone area using GIS, Journal of Hydrology540 (2016), 317–330.
41.
SabziH.Z., HumbersonD., AbuduS. and KingJ.P., Optimization of adaptive fuzzy logic controller using novel combined evolutionary algorithms, and its application in Diez Lagos flood controlling system, Southern New Mexico, Expert Systems with Applications43 (2016), 154–164.
42.
LiJ., A data-driven improved fuzzy logic control optimizationsimulation tool for reducing flooding volume at downstream urban drainage systems, Science of The Total Environment732 (2020), 138931.
43.
MilanS.G., RoozbahaniA. and BanihabibM.E., Fuzzy optimization model and fuzzy inference system for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources, Journal of Hydrology566 (2018), 421–434.
44.
KhanT., AlamM., ShahidZ. and SuudM., Prior investigation for flash floods and hurricanes, concise capsulization of hydrological technologies and instrumentation: A survey, IEEE 3rd International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Social Sciences (ICETSS), (2017), 1–6.
45.
WaytotiE., Ecosystem-Based Adaptation in the Magdalena River, Basin, United States Agency International Development - USAID, 2017.
46.
PovedaG., VelezJ., MesaO., HoyosC., MejíaF., BarcoO. and CorreaP., Influencia de fenómenos macroclimáticos sobre el ciclo anual de la hidrología colombiana: cuantificación lineal, no lineal y percentiles probabilísticos, Meteorología Colombiana (2002), 121–130.
47.
GalvisL. and QuinteroC., Geografía económica de los municipios ribereños del Magdalena, Banco de la República, (2017).
WangL. and MendelJ., Generating Fuzzy Rules by Learning from Examples, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics22 (1992), 1414–1427.
50.
SamarasingheS., Neural Networks for Applied Sciences and Engineering: From Fundamentals to Complex Pattern Recognition, Nueva York, Auerbach Publications (2006).
51.
MasoudiS., SimaM. and Tolouei-RadM., Comparative Study of ANN and ANFIS Models for Predicting Temperature in Machining, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, School of Engineering, Taylor’s University13(1) (2018), 211–225.
52.
AbderazekH., YildizA.R. and MirjaliliS., Comparison of recent optimization algorithms for design optimization of a camfollower mechanism, Knowledge-Based Systems191(5) (2020), 105237.
53.
BahrebarS., BlaabjergF., WangH., VafamandN., KhoobanM.H., RastayeshS. and ZhouD., A novel type-2 fuzzy logic for improved risk analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in marine power systems application, Energies11(4) (2018), 721.
54.
KhalghaniM.R., KhoobanM.H., Mahboubi-MoghaddamE., VafamandN. and GoodarziM., A self-tuning load frequency control strategy for microgrids: Human brain emotional learning, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems75 (2016), 311–319.
55.
ArdeshiriR.R., KhoobanM.H., NoshadiA., VafamandN. and RakhshanM., Robotic manipulator control based on an optimal fractional-order fuzzy PID approach: SiL real-time simulation, Soft Computing24 (2020), 3849–3860.
56.
BrindleA., Genetic algorithms for function optimization, PdD Thesis Tesis doctoral, University of Alberta, Canada, (1991).
57.
DarwinC., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray London, (1859).
58.
HollandJ., Adaptation in Natural and Arti cial Systems, University of Michigan Press, (1975).
59.
GoldbergD. and RichardsonJ., Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization, in Genetic Algorithms and their Applications, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, (1987).
60.
DavisL., Handbook of Genetic Algorithms, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.
61.
MichalewiczZ., Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, (1992).
62.
ReevesC., Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems, Blackwell Scientific Publications, (1993).
63.
KennedyJ. and EberhartR., Particle swarm optimization, IEEE International Conference Neural Networks (1995).
64.
PoliR., KennedyJ. and BlackwellT., Particle Swarm Optimization, An overview, Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, (2007).
65.
MoraH., Optimización no lineal y dinámica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, (2001).
66.
WackerlyD., MendenhallW. and ScheafferR., Mathematical Statistics with Applications, Belmont, Thomson Higher Education, 7 Ed. (2008).
67.
IDEAM - Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales [Accessed May 2020] http://www.ideam.gov.co/.
