The paper presents a Collaborative Adversarial Network (CAN) model for paraphrase identification, which is a collaborative network holding generator that is pitted against an adversarial network called discriminator. There has been tremendous research work and countless examinations done on sentence similarity demonstration. Learning and identifying the constant highlights, specifically in various areas and domains is the main focus of paraphrase identification. It Involves the capture of regular highlights between two sentences and the community-oriented learning upon traditional ill-disposed and adversarial learning for common feature extraction. The model outperforms the MaLSTM model, which is the baseline model, and also proves to be comparable to many of the state-of-the-art techniques.
DesoukiM.I., GomaaW.H., AbdalhakimH., A Hybrid Model for Paraphrase Detection Combines pros of Text Similarity with Deep Learning, International Journal of Computer Applications178(20) (2019), 18–23.
2.
WanS., DrasM., DaleR., ParisC., Using dependency-based features to take the “para-farce” out of paraphrase, Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Workshop (2006), 131–138.
3.
YihW., ChangM., MeekC., PastusiakA., Question answering using enhanced lexical semantic models, Association for Computational Linguistics (2013), 1744–1753.
4.
MuellerJ., ThyagarajanA., Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity, Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016), 2786–2792.
5.
HochreiterS., SchmidhuberJ., Long short-term memory, Neural Computation9(8) (1997), 1735–1780.
6.
GoodfellowI., Pouget-AbadieJ., MirzaM., XuB., Warde-FarleyD., OzairS., CourvilleA., BengioY., Generative adversarial nets, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (2014), 2672–2680.
7.
SrivastavaS., GovilkarS., A Survey on Paraphrase Detection Techniques for Indian Regional Languages, International Journal of Computer Applications975-8887 (2017), 42–47.
8.
PawarA., MagoV., Challenging the boundaries of unsupervised learning for semantic similarity, IEEE Access7 (2019), 16291–16308.
SharmaL., GraesserL., NangiaN., EvciU., Natural Language Understanding with the Quora Question Pairs Dataset arXiv preprint arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01041, (2019).
11.
LiJ., HuR., LiuX., TiwariP., PandeyH.M., ChenW., WanB., JinY., YangK., A distant supervision method based on paradigmatic relations for learning word embeddings, Neural Computing and Applications (2019), 1–10.
12.
MohammadA.S., JaradatZ., MahmoudA.A., JararwehY., Paraphrase identification and semantic text similarity analysis in Arabic news tweets using lexical, syntactic, and semantic features, Information Processing & Management53(3) (2017), 640–652.
13.
KubalamdD.R., NimkarA.V., A Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture for Paraphrase Identification, 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (2018), pp. 1–6. IEEE.
14.
LiX., LiQ., Calculation of sentence semantic similarity based on syntactic structure, Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2015).
15.
ZhuY.L., MinJ., ZhouY.Q., HuangX.J., WuL.D., Semantic orientation computing based on HowNet, Journal of Chinese Information Processing20(1) (2006), 14–20.
16.
LiuQ., LiS.J., Calculation of lexical semantic similarity based on the ‘HowNet’, in Proceedings of the 3rd Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop, Taipei, Taiwan (2002).
17.
AgarwalB., RamampiaroH., LangsethH., RuoccoM., A deep network model for paraphrase detection in short text messages, Information Processing & Management54(6) (2018), 922–937.
18.
XuW., Callison-BurchC., DolanB., SemEval-Task 1: Paraphrase and semantic similarity in Twitter (PIT), In Proceedings of the 9th international workshop on semantic evaluation (SemEval 2015) (2015), 1–11.
19.
QuanZ., WangZ.J., LeY., YaoB., LiK., YinJ., An Efficient Framework for Sentence Similarity Modeling, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing27(4) (2019), 853–865.
20.
DingX., ShiQ., CaiB., LiuT., ZhaoY., YeQ., Learning Multi-Domain Adversarial Neural Networks for Text Classification, IEEE Access7 (2019), 40323–40332.
21.
ThenmozhiD., AravindanC., Paraphrase identification by using clause-based similarity features and machine translation metrics, The Computer Journal59(9) (2016), 1289–1302.
22.
LoperE., BirdS., NLTK: the natural language toolkit, arXiv preprint cs/0205028 (2002).
23.
PenningtonJ., SocherR., ManningC.D., Glove: Global vectors for word representation, Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing(EMNLP) (2014), 1532–1543.
24.
MuellerJ., ThyagarajanA., Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity, Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016), 2787–2792.
25.
OthmanN., FaizR., SmailiK., Manhattan Siamese LSTM for Question Retrieval in Community Question Answering, OTM Confederated International Conferences” On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (2019), pp. 661–677. Springer, Cham.
26.
ChangD.J., DesokyA.H., OuyangM., RouchkaE.C., Compute pairwise manhattan distance and pearson correlation coefficient of data points with gpu, 10th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (2009), pp. 501–506. IEEE.
QuZ., YuanS., ChiR., ChangL., ZhaoL., Genetic optimization method of pantograph and catenary comprehensive monitor status prediction model based on adadelta deep neural network, IEEE Access (7) (2019), 23210–23221.
29.
DauphinY., VriesH.d., BengioY., Equilibrated adaptive learning rates for non-convex optimization, Advances in neural information processing systems (2015), 1504–1512.
30.
ChhachhiyaD., SharmaA., GuptaM., Designing optimal architecture of recurrent neural network (LSTM) with particle swarm optimization technique specifically for educational dataset, International Journal of Information Technology11(1) (2019), 159–163.
31.
JainG., SharmaM., AgarwalB., Optimizing semantic LSTM for spam detection, International Journal of Information Technology11(2) (2019), 239–250.
32.
CraswellN., Mean reciprocal rank, Encyclopedia of Database Systems1703 (2009).
33.
LiuX., HeP., ChenW., GaoJ., Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understanding, arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11504 (2019).
34.
YangR., ZhangJ., GaoX., JiF., ChenH., Simple and Effective Text Matching with Richer Alignment Features, arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.00300 (2019).
35.
MirakyanM., HambardzumyanK., KhachatrianH., Natural Language Inference over Interaction Space: ICLR Reproducibility Report, arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03198 (2018).
