MCCPI (Multiple Criteria Correlation Preference Information) is a kind of 2 dimensional decision preference information obtained by pairwise comparison on the importance and interaction of decision criteria. In this paper, we introduce the nonadditivity index to replace the Shapley simultaneous interaction index and construct an undated MCCPI based decision scheme. We firstly propose a diagram to help decision maker obtain the nonadditivity index type MCCPI, then establish transform equations to normalize them into desired capacity and finally adopt a random generation MCCPI based comprehensive decision aid algorithm to explore the dominance relationships and creditable ranking orders of all decision alternatives. An illustrative example is also given to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed decision scheme. It’s shown that based on some good properties of nonadditivity index in practice, the updated MCCPI model can deal with the internal interaction among decision criteria with relatively less model construction and calculation effort.
BeliakovG. and WuJ.-Z., Learning fuzzy measures from data: simplifications and optimisation strategies, Information Sciences494 (2019), 100–113.
5.
BeliakovG. and WuJ.-Z., Learning k-maxitive fuzzy measures from data by mixed integer programming, Fuzzy Sets and Systems (2020).
6.
ChateauneufA. and JaffrayJ.-Y., Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Möbius inversion, Mathematical Social Sciences17(3) (1989), 263–283.
7.
ChoquetG., Theory of capacities,’, institut Fourier5 (1954), 131–295.
8.
CorrenteS., GrecoS., KadzinskiM. and SłowinskiR., Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking, Machine Learning93(2-3) (2013), 381–422.
9.
DongY., LiuY., LiangH., ChiclanaF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making, Omega75 (2018), 154–164.
10.
FujimotoK., KojadinovicI. and MarichalJ.-L., Axiomatic characterizations of probabilistic and cardinal-probabilistic interaction indices, Games and Economic Behavior55(1) (2006), 72–99.
11.
GrabischM., k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems92(2) (1997), 167–189.
12.
GrabischM., KojadinovicI. and MeyerP., A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package, European Journal of Operations Research186(2) (2008), 766–785.
13.
GrabischM. and LabreucheC., A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid, Annals of Operations Research175(1) (2010), 247–286.
14.
GrabischM., MarichalJ.-L. and RoubensM., Equivalent representations of set functions, Mathematics of Operational Research25(2) (2000), 157–178.
15.
GrabischM. and RoubensM., An axiomatic approach to the concept of interaction among players in cooperative games, International Journal of Game Theory28(4) (1999), 547–565.
16.
KojadinovicI., An axiomatic approach to the measurement of the amount of interaction among criteria or players, Fuzzy Sets and Systems152(3) (2005), 417–435.
17.
KojadinovicI., Minimum variance capacity identification, European Journal of Operational Research177(2) (2007), 498–514.
18.
KolesárováA., LiJ. and MesiarR., k-additive aggregation functions and their characterization, European Journal of Operational Research265(3) (2018), 985–992.
19.
LiuY., ZhangH., WuY. and DongY., Ranking range based approach to madm under incomplete context and its application in venture investment evaluation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy25(5) (2019), 877–899.
20.
MarichalJ.-L., Entropy of discrete Choquet capacities, European Journal of Operations Research137(3) (2002), 612–624.
21.
MarichalJ.-L. and RoubensM., Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set, European Journal of Operational Research124(3) (2000), 641–650.
22.
MeyerP. and RoubensM., Choice, ranking and sorting in fuzzy multiple criteria decision aid, In J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrogott, editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pages 471–503. Springer New York, (2005).
23.
MirandaP., GrabischM. and GilP., p-symmetric fuzzy measures, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems10(supp01) (2002), 105–123.
24.
SaatyT., The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The ahp/anp approach, Operations Research61 (2013), 10.
25.
SugenoM., Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and Its Applications. PhD thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974).
26.
WangZ. and KlirG.J., Generalized Measure Theory, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, (2010).
27.
WuJ.-Z. and BeliakovG., Nonadditivity index and capacity identification method in the context of multicriteria decision making, Information Sciences467 (2018), 398–406.
28.
WuJ.-Z. and BeliakovG., Nonadditive robust ordinal regression with nonadditivity index and multiple goal linear programming, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(7) (2019), 1732–1752.
29.
WuJ.-Z. and BeliakovG., k-order representative capacity, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems38(3) (2020), 3105–3115.
30.
WuJ.-Z., YangS., ZhangQ. and DingS., 2-additive capacity identification methods from multicriteria correlation preference information, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems23(6) (2015), 2094–2106.
31.
WuJ.-Z., ZhangQ., DuQ. and DongZ., Compromise principle based methods of identifying capacities in the framework of multicriteria decision analysis, Fuzzy Sets and Systems246 (2014), 91–106.
32.
WuJ.-Z., ZhouY.-P., HuangL. and DongJ.-J., Multicriteria correlation preference information (MCCPI) based ordinary capacity identification method, Mathematics7(3) (2019), 300.
33.
XuW., ChenX., DongY. and ChiclanaF., Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation (2020), 1–22.
