Many factors with the perspective of bipolarity in the traditional Chinese food system “Yin and Yang food system” manipulate with types of food simultaneously to have a balanced body. This research studies the multiple attributes decision making (MADM) problem that measuring the “bipolarity of periodic” variation in bipolar information with an illustration example in order to find an optimal nutrition program for a person X. To convey this type of data to a mathematical formula and vice versa without losing the full meaning of human knowledge, we use bipolar fuzzy set in a complex geometry by extending the range of bipolar fuzzy set to the realm of a complex number. This extension needs to be successful to study and introduce intensely a new mathematical structure called a bipolar complex fuzzy set (BCFS) with its properties. Ranges of values are extended to [0, 1] eiα[0,1] and [-1, 0] eiα[-1,0] for both positive and negative membership functions, respectively, as a replacement for [-1, 0] × [0, 1] , as in the bipolar fuzzy set. The main benefit of BCFS that the amplitude and phase terms of BCFSs can convey bipolar fuzzy information. Moreover, the formal definition of BCF distance measure and illustration application are introduced. Some basic mathematical operations on BCFS are also proposed and study its properties with arithmetical examples.
Al-QuranA. and HassanN., The complex neutrosophic soft expert set and its application in decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems34(1) (2018), 569–582. doi: 10.3233/jifs-17806
2.
SiA., DasS. and KarS., An Approach to Rank Picture Fuzzy Numbers for Decision Making Problems, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering2(2) (2019), 54–64.
3.
AlkouriA.U.M. and SallehA.R., Complex Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relation. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, Article ID 287382, 1–18.
4.
AlkouriA.U.M. and SallehA.R., Linguistic variables, hedges and several distances on complex fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2013.
5.
AlkouriA.U.M. and SallehA.R., Complex Atanasov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets. 2012. doi:10.1063/1.4757515
6.
LiC. and TuC.-H., Complex neural fuzzy system and its application on multi-class prediction — A novel approach using complex fuzzy sets, IIM and multi-swarm learning, Applied Soft Computing (2019), 105735. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105735
7.
TianC., PengJ., ZhangS., ZhangW. and WangJ., Weighted Picture Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Multi-criteria Decision-making Problems, Computers & Industrial Engineering (2019), 106037. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.106037
8.
TamirD.E. and KandelA., Axiomatic theory of complex fuzzy logic and complex fuzzy classes, Int J of Computers, Communications & Control6(3) (2011), 562–576.
9.
TamirD.E., LinJ. and KandelA., A new interpretation of complex membership grade, International Journal of Intelligent Systems26 (2011), 285–312. View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com.
10.
TamirD.E., LastM. and KandelA., Generalized complex fuzzy propositional logic. Accepted for publication in the World Conference on Soft computing, San Francisco, 2012a.
11.
TamirD.E., LastM., TeodorescuH.N. and KandelA., Discrete complex fuzzy logic. In Proceedings of NAFIPS, 2012b.
12.
RamotD., MiloR., FriedmanM. and KandelA., Complex fuzzy sets, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems10 (2002), 171–186.
13.
RaniD. and GragM., Distance Measures Between The Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets And Their Applications To The Decision-Making Process, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification (2017), 423–439. 10.1615/Int.J.Uncertaintyquantification.2017020356.
14.
LiuF., AiwuG., LukovacV. and VukicM., A Multicriteria Model for the Selection of The Transport Service Provider: A Single Valued Neutrosophic Dematel Multicriteria Model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(2) (2018), 121–130.
15.
SmarandacheF., A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logic, Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability, American Research Press. Rehoboth. NM. 1999.
16.
SmarandacheF., A generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set, International journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics24 (2005), 287–297.
17.
SelvachandranG., MajiP.K., IsraaE.A. and AbdulS., Razak, Complex vague soft sets and its distance measures, 31(1) (2016), 55–68.
18.
WangG. and DuanY., TOPSIS approach for multi-attribute decision making problems based on n-intuitionistic polygonal fuzzy sets description, Computers & Industrial Engineering124 (2018), 573–581. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.038
19.
ZhangG., DillonT.S., CaiK.Y., MaJ. and LuJ., δ-Equalities of complex fuzzy relation, 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, 2010, April 20-23, Perth, Western Australia 1218-1224.
20.
ZhangG., DillonT.S., CaiK.Y., MaJ. and LuJ., Operation properties and δ-equalities of complex fuzzy sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning50 (2009), 1227–1249.
21.
GargH. and RaniD., Some Generalized Complex Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multicriteria Decision-Making Process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2018. doi:10.1007/s13369-018-3413-x
22.
NguyenH.T., KreinovichV. and ShekhterV., On the possibility of using complex values in fuzzy logic for representing inconsistencies, International Journal of Intelligent System13 (1998), 683–714.
AkramM., FengF., Borumand SaeidA. and FoteaV., A new multiple criteria decision-making method based on bipolar fuzzy soft graphs, Iran J Fuzzy Syst (2017), doi:10.22111/IJFS.2017.3394.11
26.
AliM. and SmarandacheF., 2017. Complex neutrosophic set, Neural Computing and Applications28(7) (2017), 1817–1834.
27.
AliM., DeliI. and SmarandacheF., The theory of neutrosophic cubic sets and their applications in pattern recognition, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems30(4) (2016), 1957–196310.3233/ifs-151906.
28.
AliM., SonL.H., DeliI. and TienN.D., Bipolar neutrosophic soft sets and applications in decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33(6) (2017), 4077–4087. doi: 10.3233/jifs-17999
29.
AliM., DatL.Q., SonL.H. and SmarandacheF., Interval Complex Neutrosophic Set: Formulation and Applications in Decision-Making, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems20(3) (2017), 986–999. doi: 10.1007/s40815-017-0380-4
30.
Gabriel CousensM.D., Conscious Eating. North Atlantic books Berkeley California, 2000, ISBN 1-55643-285-2.
31.
SarwarM. and AkramM., new applications of M-Polar fuzzy Matriods, Symmetry9 (2017), 319; doi:10.3390/sym9120319)
32.
SarwarM. and AkramM., Novel concepts bipolar fuzzy competition graphs, J Appl Math Comput54 (2016), 511–547. 12.
KakatiP., BorkotokeyS., MesiarR. and RahmanS., Interval neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy choquet integral in multicriteria decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2018), 1–19. doi:10.3233/jifs-17166
35.
DeyP.P., PramanikS. and GiriB.C., TOPSIS for solving Multi-Attributes Decision Making Problems under Bi-polar Neutrosophic Environment. in book: New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications, Chapter: CHAPTER-5, Publisher: Pons asbl, Brussels, European Union, Editors: Florentin Smarandache, Surapati Pramanik, 2016, pp. 65-77. ISBN 978-1-59973-498-9.
36.
SinghP.K., Bipolar δ–equal complex fuzzy concept lattice with its application. Nural computing and applications. Springer-verlag London Ltd., part of springer nature 2019.
37.
NarayananS.R. and MaheswariN.R.S., Sum Distance in Bipolar Fuzzy Graphs, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)30(6), 2015.
38.
ZengS., QiyasM., ArifM. and MahmoodT., Extended Version of Linguistic Picture Fuzzy TOPSIS Method and Its Applications in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Hindawi publisher. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Volume 2019, Article ID 8594938, pp. 8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8594938.
39.
WanS.-P., LiS.-Q. and DongJ.-Y., A three-phase method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making and application to haze management, Computers & Industrial Engineering123 (2018), 348–363. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.005
40.
ChenT.-Y, The electremulti criteria analysis approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications38(10) (2011), 12318–12327.
41.
PatrascuV., Similarity, Cardinality and Entropy for Bipolar Fuzzy Set in the Framework of Penta-valued Representation. Cornell university. 2015, arXiv:1506.02060.
42.
YuW., ZhangZ., ZhongQ. and SunL., Extended TODIM for multi-criteria group decision making based on unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Computers & Industrial Engineering 114 (2017), 316–328. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.10.029
43.
ZhangW.-R., Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 18–21 December 1994; pp. 305–309.
44.
ZhouX. and PengT., Application of multi-sensor fuzzy information fusion algorithm in industrial safety monitoring system, Safety Science122 (2020), 104531. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104531
45.
Al-QudahY. and HassanN., Operations on complex multi-fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33(3) (2017), 1527–1540.
46.
Al-QudahY. and HassanN., Complex multi-fuzzy soft set: Its entropy and similarity measure, IEEE Access6 (2018), 65002–65017.
47.
LiuY., LiuJ. and QinY., Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decisionmaking based on evidential reasoning and MDIFWG operator, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2019), 1–15. doi:10.3233/jifs-181777
48.
SongY., FuQ., WangY.-F. and WangX., Divergence-based cross entropy and uncertainty measures of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their application in decision making, Applied Soft Computing (2019), 105703. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105703
49.
SongY., ZhangQ. and ZhouX., X. Supplier selection model based on distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 2006, October 8-11, Taipei, Taiwan.
50.
YangY. and ChiclanaF., Consistency of 2D and 3D distances of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications39(10) (2012), 8665–8670.
51.
YazdanbakhshO. and DickS., A systematic review of complex fuzzy sets and logic, Fuzzy Sets and Systems338 (2018), 1–22.
52.
ZhangZ., GuoC. and MartinezL., Managing Multigranular Linguistic Distribution Assessments in Large-Scale Multiattribute Group Decision Making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems47(11) (2016), 3063–3076. doi: 10.1109/tsmc.2016.2560521
53.
ZhangZ., KouX. and DongQ., Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations, Expert Systems with Applications98 (2018), 118–128. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.016
54.
SinghP.K., Complex vague set based concept lattice, Chaos Solitons Fractals96 (2017), 145–153.
55.
SinghP.K. and Aswani KumarC., A note on bipolar fuzzy graph representation of concept lattice, Int J Comput Sci Math5(4) (2014), 381–393.
56.
SinghP.K. and Aswani KumarC., Bipolar fuzzy graph representation of concept lattice, Inf Sci288 (2014), 437–448.
57.
ZhangW.-R., Equilibrium Relations and Bipolar Cognitive Mapping for Online Analytical Processing, IEEE Trans on SMC, Part B33(2) (2003), 295–307.
58.
ZhangW.-R. and ZhangL., YinYang Bipolar Logic and Bipolar Fuzzy Logic, Infor Sciences165(3-4) (2004), 265–287.
59.
ZhangW.-R., Yin-Yang Bipolar Lattices and L-Sets for Bipolar Knowledge Fusion, Visualization, and Decision, Ini’l 1. of Inf. Technology and Decision Making4(4) (2005), 621–645.
60.
ZhangW.-R., YinYang Bipolar Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Equilibrium Relations for Bipolar Clustering, Optimization, and Global Regulation, Int’l1. of Inf. Technology and Decision Making5(I) (2006), 19–46.
61.
ZhangW.-R., YinYang bipolar universal modus ponens (BUMP) - a fundamental law of non-linear brain dynamics for emotional intelligence and mental health.” Proc. ofWalter 1. Freeman Workshop on Nonlinear Brain Dynamics (JCIS), 2007, Salt Lake City. doi:10.1142/9789812709677_0014
62.
ZhangW.-R., PandurangiA. and PeaceK., Yin-Yang Dynamic Neurobiological Modeling and Diagnostic Analysis of Major Depressive and Bipolar Disorders, IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering54(10) (2007), 1729–1739.
63.
ZhangW.-R. and ChenS., Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Modeling of Yin-Yang Wuxing for Diagnostic Decision Analysis in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Int’l 1. of Infor. Technology and Decision Making. (In press, Vo1.8, Issue 2, June 2009).
64.
ZhangW.-R., YinYang Bipolar Relativity: A Unifying Theory of Nature, Agents and Causality with Applications in Quantum Computing, Cognitive Informatics and Life Sciences. 2011. IGI Global. ISBN: 160960525X, 9781609605254.
