Regional integrated energy system (RIES) provides a platform for coupling utilization of multi-energy and makes various energy demand from client possible. The suitable RIES composition scheme will upgrade energy structure and improve integrated energy utilization efficiency. Based on a RIES construction project in Jiangsu province, this paper proposes a new multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) method for the selection of RIES schemes. Because that subjective evaluation on RIES schemes benefit under criteria has uncertainty and hesitancy, intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number (ITFN) which has the better capability to model ill-known quantities is presented. In consideration of risk attitude and interdependency of criteria, a new decision model with risk coefficients, Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and Choquet integral is proposed. Firstly, the decision matrices given by experts are normalized, and then are transformed to minimum expectation matrices according to different risk coefficients. Secondly, the weights of criteria from different experts are calculated by Mahalanobis-Taguchi system. Mobius transformation coefficients based on interaction degree are to calculate 2-order additive fuzzy measures, and then the comprehensive weights of criteria are obtained by fuzzy measures and Choquet integral. Thirdly, based on group decision consensus requirement, the weights of experts are obtained by the maximum entropy and grey correlation. Fourthly, the minimum expectation matrices are aggregated by the intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy Bonferroni mean operator. Thus, the ranking result according to the comparison rules using the minimum expectation and the maximum expectation is obtained. Finally, an illustrative example is taken in the present study to make the proposed method comprehensible.
YuanJ., LuoX., DingX., LiuC. and LiC., Biomass power generation fuel procurement and storage modes evaluation: A case study in Jilin, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews111 (2019), 75–86.
2.
LiuY., LiH., PengK. and ZhangC., Demonstration Projects of Intergrated Energy System in China, Energy Procedia145 (2018), 88–96.
3.
YuanJ., LiC., LiW., LiuD. and LiX., Linguistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criterion decision-making for renewable energy: A case study in Jilin, J Clean Prod172 (2018), 3201–3214.
4.
ZhangL., ZhouP., NewtonS. and FangJ., Evaluating clean energy alternatives for Jiangsu, China: an improved multi-criteria decision making method, Energy90 (2015), 953–964.
5.
MoslhiS. and ReddyT., Sustainability of integrated energy systems: A performance-based resilience assessment methodology, Appl Energ28 (2018), 487–498.
6.
WangH., ZhangR. and PengJ., GPNBI-inspired MOSFA for Pareto operation optimization of integrated energy system, Energy Conversion & Management151 (2017), 524–537.
7.
FuX., GuoQ., SunH., ZhangX. and WangL., Estimation of the failure probability of an integrated energy system based on the first order reliability method, Energy134 (2017), 1068–1078.
8.
MengF. and ZhouY., The Optimization Degree Evaluation of Energy Structure Base on the SPA-TOPSIS, Operations Research and Management Science27 (2018), 122–130.
9.
YangK., DingY., ZhuN., YangF. and QW., Multi-criteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: A case study in Tianjin, Appl Energ229 (2018), 352–363.
10.
ChenB., LiaoQ. and LiuD., Comprehensive evaluation indices and methods for regional integrated energy system, Automation of Electric Power Systems42 (2018), 174–182.
11.
XuL., ZhangY., ZhangB. and ChenL., Based on Hybrid Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method of Evaluation of Integrated Energy System Efficiency, Journal of Industrial Technological Economics42 (2014), 174–182.
12.
ZhangS. and LvS., Evaluation Method of Park-Level Integrated Energy System for Microgrid, Power System Technology42 (2018), 2431–2438.
13.
KienzleF., AhcinP. and AanderssonG., Valuing Investments in Multi-Energy Conversion, Storage, and Demand-Side Management Systems Under Uncertainty, IEEE T Sustain Energ2 (2011), 94–202.
14.
Favre-PerrodP., KienzleF. and AanderssonG., Modeling and design of future multi-energy generation and transmission systems, European Transactions on Electrical Power20 (2010), 994–1008.
15.
LiuB., ShenY., ZhangW., ChenX. and WangX., An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making, Eur J Oper Res245 (2015), 209–225.
16.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set Syst20 (1986), 87–96.
17.
YuanJ. and LiC., Intuitionistic Trapezoidal Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Based on Prospect Choquet Integral Operator and Grey Projection Pursuit Dynamic Cluster, Math Probl Eng2017 (2017), 1–13.
18.
WanS.P. and DongJ., Power geometric operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Appl Soft Comput29 (2015), 153–168.
19.
LiuX., XuY., MontesR., DingR. and HerreraF., Alternative Ranking-Based Clustering and Reliability Index-Based Consensus Reaching Process for Hesitant Fuzzy Large Scale Group Decision Making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems27 (2019), 159–171.
20.
ZhangZ. and GuoC., Consistency and consensus models for group decision-making with uncertain 2-tuple linguistic preference relations, Int J Syst Sci47 (2014), 2572–2587.
21.
ZhangZ., GuoC. and MartinezL., Managing Multigranular Linguistic Distribution Assessments in Large-Scale Multiattribute Group Decision Making, IEEE T Syst Man CY-S47 (2016), 3063–3076.
22.
YuW., ZhangZ., ZhongQ. and SunL., Extended TODIM for multi-criteria group decision making based on unbalanced hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Comput Ind Eng114 (2017), 316–328.
23.
ZhangZ. and GuoC., Deriving priority weights from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations under group decision-making settings, J Oper Res Soc68 (2017), 1582–1599.
24.
ZhangZ., KouX. and DongQ., Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations, Expert Syst Appl98 (2018), 118–128.
25.
ZhangZ., KouX., YuW. and GuoC., On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations, 143 (2018), 115–126.
26.
XuY., WenX., HaoS. and WangH., Consistency and Consensus Models with Local Adjustment Strategy for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations, Int J Fuzzy Syst20 (2018), 2216–2233.
27.
ZhangH., DongY., Palomares-CarrascosaI. and ZhouH., Failure Mode and Effect Analysis in a Linguistic Context: A Consensus-Based Multiattribute Group Decision-Making Approach, IEEE T ReliabPP (2018), 1–17.
28.
LiuX., XuY. and HerreraF., Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: Detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors, Inform Fusion52 (2019), 245–256.
29.
XuY., WenX. and ZhangW., A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection, Comput Ind Eng116 (2018), 113–129.
30.
ZhangH., DongY., ChiclanaF. and YuS., Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design, Eur J Oper Res275 (2019), 580–598.
31.
Abu-RayashA. and DincerI., Sustainability assessment of energy systems: A novel integrated model, J Clean Prod (2019), 1098–1116.
32.
YuanJ. and LiC., A new method for multi-attribute decision making with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy random variable, Int J Fuzzy Syst19 (2017), 15–26.
33.
WangJ. and ZhangZ., Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number, Control and Decision24 (2009), 226–230.
34.
ChenZ. and LiY., Approach for group MULTIMOORA decision making based upon prospect intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number Choquet integral operator, Control and Decision29 (2014), 1053–1063.
35.
ChenZ. and LiY., An improved MULTIMOORA approach for group decision making based upon interdependent inputs of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice34 (2014), 3138–3156.
36.
ChangZ. and ChengL., Grey Fuzzy Integral Correlation Degree Decision Model, Chinese Journal of Management Science23 (2015), 105–111.
37.
OmidvarA., GhazikhaniM. and ModarresRazaviS., Entropy analysis of a solar-driven variable geometry ejector using computational fluid dynamics, Energ Convers Manage119 (2016), 435–443.
38.
WuJ. and CaoQ., Same families of geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Appl Math Model37 (2013), 318–327.
39.
XuZ., Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators, Knowl-Based Syst24 (2011), 749–760.
40.
DelgadoA. and RomeroI., Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru, Environ Modell Softw77 (2016), 108–121.
41.
XuY., ZhuY., YangF. and WangW., New multi criteria decision making approach based on ANP and fuzzy integral with its application, System Engineering-Theory & Practice30 (2010), 1099–1105.
