With the deepening of people’s research on event anaphora, a large number of methods will be used in the identification and resolution of event anaphora. Although there has been some progress in the resolution of the current event, the difficult problems have not yet been completely resolved. This study analyzes the English information anaphora resolution based on SVM and machine learning algorithms and uses the CNN three-layer network as the basis to model the structure. Moreover, this study improves the semantic features by adding semantic roles and analyzes and compares the performance of the improved semantic features with those before the improvement. In addition, this study combines semantic features to compare and analyze each feature combination and uses a dual candidate model to improve the system. Finally, this study analyzes the experimental results. The results show that the performance of the system using the dual candidate model is better than that of the single candidate model system.
TommaselA. and GodoyD., A social-aware online short-text feature selection technique for social media, Information Fusion40(6) (2017), 1–17.
2.
NayakM. and NayakA.K., Odia running text recognition using moment-based feature extraction and mean distance classification technique, Advances in Intelligent Systems & Computing309(12) (2015), 497–506.
3.
RamalakshmiE. and GollaS., An advanced fuzzy constructing algorithm for feature discovery in text mining, International Journal of Computer Applications127(17) (2015), 30–34.
4.
GisselS.T., Scaffolding students’ independent decoding of unfamiliar text with a prototype of an eBook-feature, Journal of Information Technology Education Research14(2015) (2015), 439–470.
5.
OkiTakuro, Scene text localization using object detection based on filtered feature channels and crosswise region merging, Growth & Change21(3) (2015), 61–76.
6.
KambleR.R. and KodavadeD.V., Relevance feature search for text mining using FClustering algorithm, International Journal of Computer Sciences & Engineering6(7) (2018), 223–227.
7.
MaruthupandiJ. and DeviK.V., Multi-label text classification using optimised feature sets, International Journal of Data Mining Modelling & Management9(3) (2017), 237.
8.
PandiMaruthu and RajendranVimala Devi K., Efficient feature extraction for text mining, Advances in Natural & Applied Sciences10(4) (2016), 64–73.
9.
WuG., ZhaoM. and HanL., A fingerprint feature extraction algorithm based on optimal decision for text copy detection, International Journal of Security & Its Applications10(11) (2016), 67–78.
10.
SoleymanpourM. and MarviH., Text-independent speaker identification based on selection of the most similar feature vectors, International Journal of Speech Technology20(1) (2016), 1–10.
11.
MojaveriyanMohammad and HosseinEbrahimpourkomleh, Seyed jalaleddin Mousavirad. IGICA: a hybrid feature selection approach in text categorization, International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies & Applications8(3) (2016), 42–47.
12.
AghdamM.H. and HeidariS., Feature selection using particle swarm optimization in text categorization, Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Soft Computing Research5(4) (2015), 38–43.
13.
RobatiZahra, ZahediMorteza and Fayazi FarNajmeh, Feature selection and reduction for persian text classification, International Journal of Computer Applications109(17) (2015), 1–5.
14.
ZiaTehseen, AbbasQaiser and Pervez AkhtarMuhammad, Evaluation of feature selection approaches for urdu text categorization, International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies & Applications07(6) (2015), 33–40.
15.
ziaTehseen, Pervez AkhterMuhammad and AbbasQaiser, Comparative study of feature selection approaches for Urdu text categorization, Malaysian Journal of Computer Science28(2) (2015), 93–109.
16.
LiDe, Zhe JinXue and CuiLiHua, Text recognition algorithm based on text features, International Journal of Multimedia & Ubiquitous Engineering11(5) (2016), 209–220.
17.
YanK., LiZ. and ZhangC., A New multi-instance multi-label learning approach for image and text classification, Multimedia Tools & Applications75(13) (2016), 7875–7890.
18.
AgnihotriD., VermaK. and TripathiP., Computing symmetrical strength of N-grams: a two pass filtering approach in automatic classification of text documents, SpringerPlus5(1) (2016), 942–956.
19.
KumarGanesh and VivekanandanK., Intelligent model view controller based semantic webservice call through mishmash text featuring technique, Journal of Computational & Theoretical Nanoscience14(4) (2017), 2021–2029.
20.
ShuklaAlok Kumar, et al., Knowledge discovery in medical and biological datasets by integration of relief-f and correlation feature selection techniques, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems38(5), 6637–6648.
21.
ShiB., BaiX. and YaoC., An end-to-end trainable neural network for image-based sequence recognition and its application to scene text recognition, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence39(11) (2017), 2298–2304.
22.
ShakirHina, RasheedHaroon and Rasool KhanTariq Mairaj, Radiomic feature selection for lung cancer classifiers, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems38(5) (2020), 5847–5855.
23.
Zatarain-CabadaRamón, Barrón-EstradaMaría Lucia, García-LizárragaJorge, et al., Java tutoring system with facial and text emotion recognition, International Journal of Advanced Computer Research106(106) (2015), 49–55.
24.
Al-TahrawM.M., Polynomial neural networks versus other arabic text classifiers, Journal of Software11(5) (2016), 418–430.
