Abstract
The aim of this paper is to correct the assertions (3) and (4) of Proposition 3.6 proposed by Alkhazaleh [Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 32 (2017) 4311-4318]. Every notions involved are extend to the arbitrary set case in a clear, rigorous, and non-burdensome manner. A counterexample is given to illustrate the flaw of the assertions. Then we introduce two new notions describing ‘subset’ of n-valued refined neutrosophic soft sets (n-VRNSs for short) and ‘equal’ of n-VRNSs, and give some examples and related propositions. Finally, we use these results to remedy the flaw of the assertions, and to improve the work of Alkhazaleh.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
