This study presents a possible relationship between two main objects, which are three-dimensional copulas (3D-Cs) and geometric picture fuzzy numbers (GPFNs). This opens up a potential field for future studies for these two objects that three-dimensional copulas can become useful tools for handling uncertainty information in the form of a picture fuzzy set (PFS). Specifically, we define a GPFN as a base element of the PFS and a defined domain of three-dimensional copulas that contains a set of GPFNs, then we show some examples of three-dimensional copulas identified on this domain. In this framework, we present the theorems related to these two objects. At the same time, we provide some examples for three-dimensional semi-copulas, three-dimensional quasi-copulas, and three-dimensional empirical copulas defined on D, which is a defined domain of a three-dimensional copula and contains a set of GPFNs In addition, we also introduce a new approach to non-linear programming problems.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
2.
AguiloI., SunerJ. and TorrensJ., A construction method of semicopulas from fuzzy negations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems226 (2013), 99–114.
3.
BonissoneP.P., Selecting uncerainty calculi and granularity: An experiment in trading off precision and complexity, Proceedings of the firstWorkshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles (1985), 57–66.
4.
BadiI.A., AbdulshahedA.M. and ShetwanA.G., A case study of supplier selection for a steelmaking company in Libya by using the Combinative Distance-based ASsessment (CODAS) model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(1) (2018), 1–12.
5.
ClemenR.T. and ReillyT., Correlation and copulas for decision and risk analysis, J. Management Science45(2) (1999), 208–224.
6.
CuadrasC.M., FortianaJ. and Rodriguez-LallenaJ., Distributions with marginals and statistical modelling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, (2003).
7.
CuongB.C., Picture fuzzy sets, Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics V.30, N.4 (2014), 409–420.
8.
CuongB.C. and KreinovichV., Picture fuzzy sets – a new concept for computational intelligence problems, In Proceeding of 2013 third world congress on information and
9.
DolatiA., SanchezJ.F. and Ubeda-FloresM., A copula-based family of fuzzy implication operatos, Fuzzy Sets and Systems211 (2013), 55–61.
10.
DeschrijverG., CornelisC. and KerreE.E., On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and tconorms, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems12 (2004), 45–61.
11.
DuboisP. and PradeH., Trangular norms for fuzzy sets. In International Symposiumof Fuzzy Sets, Linz (1981), 39–68.
12.
DuranteF. and SempiC., Principles of Copula Theory, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC Press, Boca Ranton - London-New York (2016), 314 p.
13.
ElidanG., Copulas in machine learning. Vol 213 of Lecture Notes in Statistics Proceedibgs, Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg, (2013), 39–60.
14.
FeronR., Sur les tableaux de correlation dont les marges sont donnees, cas de lespace a trois dimensions, Publ Inst statist Univ Paris5 (1956), 3–12.
15.
FrechetM., Sur les tableaux de correlation dont les marges sont donnees, Ann Univ Lyon Sect A14 (1951), 53–77.
16.
FrechetM., Remarques au sujet de la note précédente, C.R. Acad Sci Paris Ser I Math246 (1958), 2719–2720.
17.
GenestC., GendronM. and Bourdeau-BrienM., The advent of copulas in finance, Europ J Finance53 (2009), 609–618.
18.
GenestC., FavreA.C., BeliveauJ. and JacquesC., Metaelliptical copulas and their use in frequency analysis of multivariate hydrological data, Water Resour Res43 (2007), 1–12.
19.
HougaardP., Analysis of multivariate surival data, Statisics for Biology and Health, Springer - Verlage, New York, (2000).
20.
JarorskiP., DuranteF. and HardleW., Copulae in mathematical and quantitative finance, Vol 213 of Lecture Notes in Statistics Proceedibgs, Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg, (2013).
21.
GoguenE.P., MesiarR. and PapE., Trangular norms, Dordrecht, Kluwer, (2000).
22.
LiuF., AiwuG., LukovacV. and VukicM., A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(2) (2018), 121–130.
23.
MukhametzyanovI. and PamucarD., A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering1(2) (2018), 121–130.
24.
MarshallA.W., Copulas, marginals and joint distributions, Vol 28 of Lecture Notes in Distributions with fixed marginals and related topics, Institute of Mathematical Statistics Hayward, CA, (1996), 213–222.
NelsenR.B., An Introduction to Copulas, Second Edition, Springer, New York, (2006).
27.
PengS., Study on enterprise risk management assessment based on picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making method, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33 (2017), 3451–3458.
28.
SalvadoriG., De MicheleC., KottegodaN.T. and RossoR., Extremes in nature, An Approach using Copulas., Kluwer, Dordrecht, (2007).
29.
ScheizerA. and WolffE.F., On nonparametric measure of dependence for random variables, Ann Statistics9, 879–885.
30.
SklarA., Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges, Publ Inst star Univ Paris8 (1959), 449–460.
31.
SklarA., Random variables, Kybernetika, Jopint Distribution Functions and Copulas9 (1973), 229–231.
32.
SunC., BieZ., XieM. and JiangJ., Fuzzy copula model for wind speed correlation and its application in wind curtailment evaluation, Renewable Energy93 (2016), 68–76.
33.
SonL.H., DPFCM: A novel distributed picture fuzzy clustering method on picture fuzzy sets, Expert Systems with Applications42 (2015), 51–66.
34.
SonL.H., Generalized picture distance measure and applications to picture fuzzy clustering, Applied Soft Computing46 (2016), 284–295.
35.
SongP.X.K., Correlated data analysis: modeling, analytics and applications, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, (2007).
36.
ThongP.H. and SonL.H., A Novel Automatic Picture Fuzzy Clustering Method Based On Particle Swarm Optimization and Picture Composite Cardinality, Knowledge-Based Systems, (2016), doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.06.023
37.
WangL., PengJ. and WangJ., A multi-criteria decision-making framework for risk ranking of energy performance contracting project under picture fuzzy environment, Journal of Cleaner Production191 (2018), 105–118.
38.
WangR., WangJ., GaoH. and WeiG., Methods for MADM with Picture Fuzzy Muirhead Mean Operators and Their Application for Evaluating the Financial Investment Risk, Symmetry11(1) (2019), 6.
39.
WeiG., WeiC., WangJ., GaoH. and WeiY., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications to potential evaluation of emerging technology commercialization, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(1) (2019), 50–81.
40.
WeiG. and ZhangZ., Some Single-Valued Neutrosophic Bonferroni Power Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10(3) (2019), 863–882.
41.
ZhangS., GaoH., WeiG., WeiY. and WeiC., Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making under Picture 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment, Mathematics7(3) (2019), 243.
42.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Infor and Contr8 (1965), 338–353.
