A new dynamic multi-attribute group decision making method based on matrix grey target decision model is proposed. The attributes’ data of alternatives about decision makers in different stages are represented by matrices, and they are considered as performance values in 4-dimensional space. The best, worst attributes’ values in other 3-dimensions formed the new matrices, which are defined as expected bull’s-eye, unexpected bull’s-eye, and then the deviations of alternatives and expected, unexpected bull’s eye are presented using matrix norm. The alternatives are ranked by the deviations. Finally, the examples are provided to illustrate the proposed method.
CaiC.G., XuX.H., WangP., et al., A multi-stage conflict style large group emergency decision-making method, Soft Computing (2016), 1–14.
2.
WangL., RodriguezR.M., WangY.-M., A dynamic multi-attribute group emergency decision making method considering experts’ hesitation, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems11 (2018), 163–182.
3.
ZhangZ., ChenJ., HuY., et al., A dynamic fuzzy group decision making method for supplier selection, Journal of Applied Sciences13(14) (2013), 2788–2794.
4.
HuangW., ZhangX., LiC., et al., A Multi-layer Dynamic Model for Coordination Based Group Decision Making in Water Resource Allocation and Scheduling, Intelligent Computing and Information Science Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, p. 148.
5.
RamezaniF., MemarianiA. and LuJ., A dynamic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system for manager selection, 124 (2011), 265–274.
6.
XuZ.S., Multi-period multi-attribute group decision-making under linguistic assessments, International Journal of General Systems38(8) (2009), 823–850.
7.
PérezI.J., CabrerizoF.J., Herrera-ViedmaE., Group decision making problems in a linguistic and dynamic context, Expert Systems with Applications38(3) (2011), 1675–1688.
8.
Blanco-MesaF., MerigóJ.M., Gil-LafuenteA.M., Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems32(3) (2017), 2033–2050.
9.
SuZ.X., ChenM.Y., XiaG.P., et al., An interactive method for dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making, Expert Systems with Applications38(12) (2011), 15286–15295.
10.
GuptaM., MohantyB.K., An algorithmic approach to group decision making problems under fuzzy and dynamic environment, Expert Systems with Applications55(15) (2016), 118–132.
11.
YuanJ.H., LiC.B., Intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy group decision-making based on prospect choquet integral operator and grey projection pursuit dynamic cluster, Mathematical Problems in Engineering12 (2017), 1–13.
12.
LinW., YanG., ShiY., Dynamic multi-attribute group decision making model based on generalized interval- valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Cybernetics & Information Technologies14(4) (2015), 11–28.
13.
LuoD., LiY., Multi-stage and multi-attribute risk group decision-making method based on grey information, Grey Systems5(2) (2015), 222–233.
14.
YanS.L., LiuS.F., Multi-stage group risk decision making with grey numbers based on grey target and prospect theory, Grey Systems: Theory and Application6(1) (2016), 64–79.
15.
LourenzuttiR., KrohlingR.A., A generalized TOPSIS method for group decision making with heterogeneous information in a dynamic environment, Information Sciences330 (2016), 1–18.
16.
XuZ.S., Approach to multi-stage multi-attribute group decision making, International Journal of Information, Technology & Decision Making10(1) (2011), 121–146.
17.
KacprzykJ., YagerR.R., MerigóJ.M., Towards human centric aggregation via the ordered weighted aggregation operators and linguistic data summaries: A new perspective on Zadeh’s inspirations, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine14(1) (2019), 16–30.
18.
ZhuJ.J., LiuS.F., LiH.W., et al., Aggregation approach to multiple-stage multiple-judgment preference styles in group decision making, Control & Decision23(7) (2008), 730–734.
19.
DongQ., CooperO., A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making, European Journal of Operational Research250(2) (2016), 521–530.
20.
PérezI.J., CabrerizoF.J., AlonsoS., et al., On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems, Information Sciences459 (2018), 20–35.
21.
SunY., DuanW., LiC.H., et al.Multi-criteria group decision making approach with variable weights in dynamic environment, Computer Engineering & Applications51(2) (2015), 1–6.
22.
ZhangF., IgnatiusJ., LimC.P., et al., A two-stage dynamic group decision making method for processing ordinal information, Knowledge-Based Systems70(C) (2014), 189–202.
23.
CabrerizoF.J., HerreraV.E., A mobile decision support system for dynamic group decision-making problems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans40(6) (2010), 1244–1256.
24.
ZengB., LiuS.F., A self-adaptive intelligence gray prediction model with the optimal fractional order accumulating operator and its application, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences23(1) (2017), 1–15.
25.
ZengB., LiC., Forecasting the natural gas demand in China using a self-adapting intelligent grey model, Energy (112)(2016), 810–825.
26.
ZengB., LiC., Improved multi-varible grey forecasting mod- el with a dynamic background vaue coefficient and its applica-tion, Computers & Industrial Engineering (118)(2018), 278–290.
27.
LuoD., WangX., The multi-attribute grey target decision method for attribute value within three-parameter interval grey number, Applied Mathematical Modeling36 (2012), 1957–1963.
28.
WangX., DangY.G., Multi-index grey target decision method based on adjustment coefficient, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems29(2) (2015), 769–775.
29.
LiuS.F., YuanW.F., Sheng.K.Q., Multi-attribute intelligent grey target decision model, Control and Decision25(8) (2010), 1159–1163.
30.
YanS.L., LiuS.F., LiuJ.F., WuL.F., Dynamic grey target decision making method with grey numbers based on existing state and future development trend of alternatives, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems28 (2015), 2159–2168.
31.
ZhuJ.J., HipelK.W., Multiple stages grey target decision making method with incomplete weight based on multi-granularity linguistic label, Information Sciences212(12) (2012), 15–32.
