Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Liquefaction is an important damage potential event after earthquakes. Therefore, liquefaction potential of soil should be estimated correctly to decrease these damages. It has been developed a lot of methods for liquefaction estimation based on semi-empirical simplified procedure. In this study, fuzzy logic soil liquefaction potential determination method was first described and then compared with both field observations and other semi-empirical simplified soil liquefaction determination methods. 250 site observations given in the literature were used in both methods. Soil liquefaction potential was predicted successfully using this both methods for the 220 cases out of 250. It was made comparison using these methods for remaining 30 cases. The fuzzy soil liquefaction assessment with certain probabilities provided the authors involved in the design and construction stages to make a flexible decision. Then fuzzy logic liquefaction determination method is applied on the Sirt bridge case in Afyonkarahisar /Turkey. It was decided to construct a sufficient amount of piles under the Sirt bridge foundation for the purpose of decreasing the effects of a possible soil liquefaction occurrence.

Keywords

Earthquake soil liquefaction fuzzy logic bridge foundation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

H.B.

Seed and

I.M.

Idriss , Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA; 1982, p. 134.

R.D.

Andrus and

K.H.

Stokoe , Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity. NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, Salt Lake City, UT, Technical Report NCEER-97-0022,

T.L.

Youd and

I.M.

Idriss , eds., National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, 1997, pp. 89–128.

R.D.

Andrus and

K.H.

Stokoe , Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 126(11) (2000), 1015–1025.

I.M.

Idriss and

R.W.

Boulanger , Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes (invited paper), 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering (ICSDEE) and the 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (ICEGE), Berkeley, California, USA, 2004.

I.M.

Idriss and

R.W.

Boulanger , Soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Monograph MNO-12. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 2008, p. 261.

Kayen ,

R.E.S.

Moss ,

E.M.

Thompson ,

H.B.

Seed ,

K.O.

Cetin ,

Der Kiureghian ,

Tanaka and

Tokimatsu , Shear-wave velocity-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential, J Geotech & Geoenv Engrg, ASCE 139 (2003), 407–419.

R.E.

Kayen ,

J.K.

Mitchell ,

R.B.

Seed ,

Lodge ,

Nishio and

R.Q.

Coutinho , Evaluation of SPT, CPT and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessments using Loma Prieta data, Proc, 4th US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction, NCEER-92-0019, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, 1992, pp. 177–192.

R.E.

Kayen and

J.K.

Mitchell , Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by arias intensity, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (1997), 1162–1173.

P.K.

Robertson and

C.E.

Wride , Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on SPT and CPT, Proceedings of NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo, Technical Report No. NCEER-97-0022, 1997, pp. 4–88.

10.

P.K.

Robertson and

C.E.

Wride , Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the Cone Penetration Test, Can Geotech J 35(3) (1998), 442–459.

11.

H.B.

Seed ,

I.M.

Idriss and

Arango , Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 109(3) (1983), 458–482.

12.

H.B.

Seed ,

Tokimatsu ,

L.F.

Harder and

R.M.

Chung , Influence of SPT prodecures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations, Journal Geotechnical Engineering 111(12) (1985), 1425–1445.

13.

R.E.S.

Moss , CPT-based probabilistic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction initiation. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.

14.

R.E.S.

Moss ,

H.B.

Seed ,

R.E.

Kayen ,

J.P.

Stewart ,

Der Kiureghian and

K.O.

Cetin , CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential, J Geotech & Geoenv Engrg, ASCE 132 (2006), 1032–1051.

15.

T.D.

Stark and

S.M.

Olson , Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (1995), 856–869.

16.

Tokimatsu ,

J.L.F.

Harder and

Chung , The Influence of SPT procedures on soil liquefaction resistance evaluations, Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1984.

17.

T.L.

Youd ,

I.M.

Idriss ,

R.D.

Andrus ,

Arango ,

Castro ,

J.T.

Christain ,

Dobry ,

W.D.L.

Finn ,

L.F.

Harder ,

M.E.

Hynes ,

Ishihara ,

K.J.

Power ,

Liao ,

W.F.

Marcuson ,

G.R.

Martin ,

J.K.

Mitchell ,

Moriwaki ,

M.S.

Power ,

P.K.

Robertson ,

R.E.

Seed and

K.H.

Stokoe , Summary report of the 1996. NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1997.

18.

Zhang , Assessment of liquefaction potential using optimum seeking method, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (1998), 739–748.

19.

R.W.

Boulanger and

I.M.

Idriss , CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142 (2016), 4015065.

20.

R.W.

Boulanger and

I.M.

Idriss , Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure, J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1138 (2012), 1185–1195.

21.

K.O.

Cetin ,

H.B.

Seed ,

Der Kiureghian ,

Tokimatsu ,

L.F.

Harder ,

R.E.

Kayen and

R.E.S.

Moss , SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential, J Geotech & Geoenv Engrg ASCE 130 (2004), 1314–1340.

22.

Kumar ,

Venkatesh and

Kumar , Approaches for estimating liquefaction potential of soils, International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering 1(2) (2013), 35–53.

23.

Y.R.

Chen ,

H.Y.

Liang and

C.K.

Tsai , Applying fuzzy theory combined with genetic algorithms to evaluate earthquake-induced liquefaction potential, EJGE 17 (2012), 1087–1114.

24.

S.G.

Chern ,

C.Y.

Lee and

C.C.

Wang , CPT-Based liquefaction assessment by using fuzzy-neural network, Journal of Marine Science and Technology 16(2) (2008), 139–148.

25.

S.G.

Chern ,

R.F.

Hu ,

Y.J.

Chang and

I.F.

Tsai , Fuzzy-art neural networks for predicting Chi-Chi Earthquake induced liquefaction in Yuan-Lin area, Journal of Marine Science and Technology 10(1) (2002), 21–32.

26.

D.J.

Elton ,

Juang and

Sukumaran , Liquefaction susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy sets, Soils and Foundation 35(2) (1995), 49–60.

27.

S.R.

Garcia ,

M.P.

Romo and

Botero , A neuro fuzzy system to analyze liquefaction-induced lateral spread, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Elsevier 28 (2008), 169–180.

28.

M.S.

Rahman and

Wang , Fuzzy neural network models for liquefaction prediction, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 22(8) (2002), 685–694.

29.

H.B.

Seed and

I.M.

Idriss , Evaluation of liquefaction potential of sand deposits based on observations of performance in previous earthquakes, Pre-print 81-544, Session on In-situ Testing to Evaluate Liquefaction Susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, Missouri, 1981.

30.

U.S. Cavus, Fuzzy logic model evaluation of liquefaction potential of soils due to earthquake. PhD Thesis.

Civil Engineering Department, Suleyman Demirel University, 2004, p. 108.

31.

Dai Jie , Liquefaction potential zonation of Taipei basin. Thesis for Master degree, Department of Civil Engineering. National Taiwan University, 2003.

32.

Delgado ,

C.L.

Casado ,

Alfaro ,

J.J.

Giner and

Estevez , Liquefaction potential in the Lower Segura river basin (south-east-Spain), Engineering Geology 49 (1998), 61–79.

33.

I.M.

Idriss , Response of soft soil sites during earthquakes, Proc, H.B. Seed Memorial Symp., vol. 2, BiTech, Publisher, Vancouver, 1990, pp. 273–289.

34.

T.L.

Holzer ,

M.J.

Bennett ,

D.J.

Ponti and

J.C.

Tinsley , Liquefaction and soil failure during 1994 Northridge Earthquake, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering (1999), 438–452.

35.

K.I.

Kelson ,

C.S.

Hitchcock and

C.E.

Randolph , Liquefaction susceptibility in the inner Rio Grande Valley near Albuquerque, New Mexico. Final technical report, U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, 1999, pp. 1–36.

36.

H.B.

Seed and

I.M.

Idriss , Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, Journals Soil Mechanics and Foundations Div ASCE 97(9) (1971), 1249–1273.

37.

H.B.

Seed and

I.M.

Idriss , Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA, 1982, p. 134.

38.

Zorluer ,

Icaga ,

Yurtcu and

Tosun , Application of a fuzzy rule-based method for the determination of clay dispersibility, Geoderma 160 (2010), 189–196.

39.

M.Y.

Kaltakci ,

M.H.

Arslan ,

H.H.

Korkmaz and

Kamanli , Failure of superstructures after the ``February 03, 2002 sultandagi- cay earthquake, Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2(10) (2007), 1569–1575.

40.

Ozer , New information on earthquake history of the Aksehir-Afyon graben system, Turkey, since the second half of 18th century, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6 (2006), 1017–1023.

41.

Taymaz ,

Tan ,

Ozalaybey and

Karabulut , Source characteristics of February 03, 2002 Sultandagi- Cay Earthquake (Mw: 6.5) sequence in SW-Turkey: A synthesis of seismological observations of body wave-forms, strong motions and aftershock seismicity survey data, 1st International Symposium of ITU of Mines on of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Istanbul-Turkey, Abstracts, 2002, p. 60.

42.

Polat and

Kalkan , Attenuation modeling of recent earthquakes in Turkey, Journal of Seismology (6) (2002), 397–409.

Fuzzy logic based assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential and its application to foundations of bridge piers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References