The uncertainty in the data is a hurdle in decision-making problems. Rough set theory and fuzzy set theory are built to handle the uncertainty in data. We introduce the rough bipolar fuzzy sets as a hybridization of rough sets and the bipolar fuzzy sets. After that, we discuss a group decision making problem with the data having fuzziness endowed with bipolarity and iron out this problem by applying the rough bipolar fuzzy sets. We also propose an algorithm for this problem, which yields the best decision, as well as, the worst decision between some objects.
CagmanN., CitakF., EnginogluS., Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy softset theory and its applications, Turk J. Fuzzy Syst. 1 (2010), 21–35.
4.
ChenX., ZhangH., DongY.C., The fusion process with heterogeneouspreference structures in group decision making: A survey, Inf. Fusion24(2015), 72–83.
5.
DongY.C., LiC.C., FranciscoH., Connecting the linguistichierarchy and the numerical scale for the 2-tuple linguistic model and itsuse to deal with hesitant unbalanced linguistic information, Inf. Sciences367–368 (2016), 259–278.
6.
DongY.C., ZhaQ., ZhangH., KouG., FujitaH., ChiclanaF., Herrera-ViedmaE., Consensus reaching in social network group decisionmaking: Research paradigms and challenges, Knowledge-based syst. (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036.
7.
DongY.C., ZhangH., Herrera-ViedmaE., Consensus reaching modelin the complex and dynamic MAGDM problem, Knowledge-based syst. 106 (2016), 206–219.
8.
DuboisD., PradeH., Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets, Int. J. Gen. Syst. 17(2–3) (1990), 191–209.
9.
DuboisD., PradeH., Fuzzy sets: a survey of engineeringapplications, Comput. Chem. Engng. 17(1) (1993), 373–380.
10.
DuboisD., PradeH., An introduction to bipolar representationsof information and preferences, Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23(8) (2008), 866–877.
11.
FengF., ChanguingLi., DavvazB., AliM.I., Soft sets combined withfuzzy sets and rough sets: a tentative approach, Soft Comput. 14 (2010), 899–911.
12.
FengF., JunY.B., Liuu., LiL., An adjustable approach to fuzzysoft set based decision-making, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234(1) (2010), 10–20.
13.
LeeK.M., Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their basic operations, Proc. Int. Conf. on Intell. Technologies, Bangkok Thailand (2000), 307–317.
14.
LeeK.M., Comparison of interval-valued fuzzy sets,intuitionistic fuzzy sets and bipolar-valued fuzzy sets, J. Fuzzy LogicIntell. Syst. 14 (2004), 125–129.
15.
LiC.C., RodríguezR.M., MartínezL., DongY.C., FranciscoH., Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: Aninterval consistency index, Inf. Sciences432 (2018), 347–361.
PawlakZ., SkowronA., Rudiments of rough sets, Inf. Sci. 177(2007), 3–27.
19.
PerezI.J., CabrerizoF.J., AlonsoS., DongY.C., ChiclanaF., Herrera-ViedmaE., On dynamic consensus processes in group decision makingproblems, Inf. Sciences459 (2018), 20–35.
20.
ShabirM., AliM.I., Soft ideals and generalized fuzzy ideals in semigroups, New Mathematics and Neural Computation5(3) (2009), 599–615.
21.
ShabirM., JunY.B., NawazY., Characterizations of regular semgroups by (α, β)-fuzzy ideals, Comput. Math. with Appl. 59(1) (2010), 161–175.
22.
ShabirM., JunY.B., NawazY., Semigroups characterized by (∈, ∈ ∨ qk)-fuzzy ideals, Comput. Math. with Appl. 60(5) (2010), 1473–1493.
23.
ShabirM., MalikN., MahmoodT., Characterizations of hemirings bythe properties of their interval-valued fuzzy ideals, Annals of Fuzzy Math. Inf. 3(2) (2012), 229–242.
24.
ShabirM., MalikN., MahmoodT., On interval-valued fuzzy idealsin hemirings, Annals of Fuzzy Math. Inf. 4(1) (2012), 49–62.
25.
ShabirM., MalikN., MahmoodT., On interval-valued fuzzy h-idealsin hemirings, East Asian Math. J. 28(1) (2012), 49–62.
26.
TorraV., Hesitant fuzzy sets, Int. J. Intell. Syst. doi: 10.1002/int.20418.
27.
WuY., LiC.C., ChenX., DongY.C., Group decision making based onlinguistic distributions and hesitant assessments: Maximizing the supportdegree with an accuracy constraint, Inf. Fusion41 (2018), 151–160.
YejunX., FranciscoJ.C., HerreraV.E., A consensus model forhesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocationmanagement, Appl. Soft Comput. 58 (2017), 265–284.
ZhanJ., AliM.I., MehmoodN., Z-soft fuzzy rough set model andcorresponding decision-making methods, Appl. Soft Comput. 56 (2017), 446–457.
32.
ZhangH., IvánP., DongY.C., WangW., Managing non-cooperative behaviors in consensus-based multiple attribute group decision making: Anapproach based on social network analysis, Knowledge-based syst. (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.008.
33.
ZhangW.R., Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: a computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis, Proc. of the Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intell. Syst. Conf. and NASA Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks & Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Inf. Processing Society Biannual Conf. San Antonio, Teu USA (1994), 305–309.
