In this study, a new concept of intuitionistic fuzzy abstract algebra using t-norms and t-conorms was introduced. Example that show the differences between intuitionistic fuzzy abstract algebra was given. Some properties were proved. Intuitionistic fuzzy congruence relation with respect to t-norms and t-conorms on (T, S)- intuitionistic fuzzy abstract algebra was examined.
AnthonyJ.M. and SherwoodH., Fuzzy Groups Redefined, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications69 (1979), 124–130.
2.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, VII ITKR.s Session, Sofia, June, 1983.
3.
AtanassovK.T., Studies in fuzziness and soft computingon intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory, ISBN 978-3-642-29126-5, Springer, 2012.
4.
AtanassovK.T., Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logics, ISBN 978-3-319-48953-7, Springer, Cham, 2017.
5.
BadhuraysL.B., BashammakhS.A. and AlshehriO., Triangular Norms Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy BCK-submodules, J Computational Analysis and App23(5) (2017), 910–924.
6.
BirkhoffG., Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, United States of America, 1940, pp. 418.
BustinceH. and BurilloP., Structures on intuitionistic fuzzy relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems78 (1996), 293–303.
9.
CohnP.M., Universal Algebra, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht: Holland/ Boston: U.S.A/London: England, 1981, pp. 412.
10.
Çuvalcioğlu G. and Tarsuslu (Yilmaz)S., Universal Algebra in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory, Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets23(1) (2017), 1–5.
11.
ÇuvalcioğluG., Some properties of t-intuitionistic fuzzy Hv-rings, Sakarya University Journal of Science21(6) (2017), 1182–1187.
12.
Çuvalcioğlu G. and Tarsuslu (Yilmaz) S., Isomorphism Theorems on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Abstract Algebras, Communications In Mathematics And Applications, Accepted.
13.
DavvazB., CorsiniP. and Leoreanu-FoteaV., Atanassov’s intuitionistic (S, T)– fuzzy n– ary sub-hypergroups and their properties, Information Sciences179(5) (2009), 654–666.
14.
DeschrijverG. and KerreE.E., On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relations, Fuzzy Sets and systems136 (2003), 333–361.
15.
GuerreroM., GarcíaM., SoriaJ. and CastilloO., A New Algorithm Based On The Cuckoo Search With Dynamic Adaptation Of Parameters Using Fuzzy Systems, Journal of UniversalMathematics1(1) (2018), 32–61.
16.
HurK., SuY.J. and HeeW.K., The lattice of intuitionistic fuzzy congruences, Int Math Forum5(1) (2006), 211–236.
17.
HurK., JangS.Y. and AhnY.S., Intuitionistic fuzzy equivalence relations, Honam Math J27(2) (2005), 163–181.
18.
JanisV., t-Norm based cuts of intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences180(7) (2010), 1134–1137.
MellianiS., MoujahidA., KajouniA. and ChadliL.S., Fuzzy Nonlinear Second Order Volterra Integrodifferential Equation, Journal of Universal Mathematics1(1) (2018), 1–8.
21.
MengerK., Statistical metrics, Proe Nat Aead Sei U S A8 (1942), 535–537.
22.
MuraliV., A Study of Universal Algebra in Fuzzy Set Theory, Rhodes University, Department of Mathematics, PhD. Thesis, 1987, pp. 104.
23.
MuraliV., Fuzzy congruence relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems41(3) (1991), 359–369.
24.
RosenfeldA., Fuzzy Groups, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications35 (1971), 512–517.
25.
Tarsuslu(Yilmaz) S. and Çitil M., Intuitionistic Fuzzy Congruence Relations On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Abstract Algebras, Gazi University Journal Of Science, Accepted.
26.
WuJ. and ChiclanaF., Multiplicative Consistency of Intuitionistic Reciprocal Preference Relations and Its Application to Missing Values Estimation and Consensus Building, Knowledge-Based Systems71 (2014), 187–200.
27.
WuJ., ChiclanaF. and LiaoH., Isomorphic multiplicative transitivity for intuitionistic and interval-valued fuzzy preference relations and its application in deriving their priority vectors, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26 (2018), 193–202.
28.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control8 (1965), 338–353.
29.
ZadehL.A., The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Inform Sci8 (1975), 133–139.
30.
ZhangZ. and GuoC., Deriving priority weights from intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations under group decision-making settings, Journal of the Operational Research Society68 (2017), 1582–1599.