In order to improve the ability of cloud computing data scheduling, this paper proposes a new method for multi-task, multi-level cloud computing data aggregation based on fuzzy association feature extraction. Heterogeneous directed graph analysis method is used to design cloud computing data. The semantic correlation fusion method is used to implement cloud computing data feature extraction and adaptive scheduling. The fuzzy clustering is used to process the characteristic amount of cloud computing data, and the optimal aggregation of cloud computing data is realized. Simulation results show that the method has a higher recall rate for multi-task and multi-level cloud data aggregation, and the highest recall rate can reach 1, which improves the accuracy of resource aggregation.
GeorgeA. and SumathiA., Dyadic product and crow lion algorithm based coefficient generation for privacy protection on cloud, Cluster Computing22(4) (2019), 1–12.
2.
TangF., YangL.T., TangC., et al., A dynamical and load-balanced flow scheduling approach for big data centers in clouds, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing6(4) (2018), 915–928.
3.
LitjensG., KooiT., BejnordiB.E., et al., A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis, Medical Image Analysis42(9) (2017), 60–88.
4.
GennarelliG. and SoldovieriF., Multipath ghosts in radar imaging: physical insight and mitigation strategies, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing8(3) (2014), 1078–1086.
5.
HouG.Y., ChenG.Y. and LuZ.Q., Simulation research on distributed data storage in cloud computing, Computer Simulation35(7) (2018), 318–322.
6.
AzizaH. and KrichenS., Bi-objective decision support system for task-scheduling based on genetic algorithm in cloud computing, Computing100(2) (2018), 65–91.
7.
YuH. and YangW., A fast feature extraction and matching algorithm for unmanned aerial vehicle images, Information38(3) (2016), 509–516.
8.
ChenJ. and WangY.L., A resource demand prediction method based on EEMD in cloud computing, Procedia Computer Science131 (2018), 116–123.
9.
YangJ.C., JiangB. and SongB., A distributed image-retrieval method in multi-camera system of smart city based on cloud computing, Future Generation Computer Systems81 (2017), 244–251.
10.
AlamK.A., AhmedR., ButtF.S., et al., An uncertainty-aware integrated fuzzy AHP-WASPAS model to evaluate public cloud computing services, Procedia Computer Science130 (2018), 504–509.
11.
YinL., LinX.Q. and ChenL.F., Moving object removal forgery detection algorithm in video frame, Journal of Computer Applications38(3) (2018), 879–883.
12.
LiM.A., CuiY., YangJ.F., et al., An adaptive multi-domain fusion feature extraction with method HHT and CSSD, Acta Electronica Sinica41(12) (2013), 2479–2486.
13.
SharmaN.K. and ReddyG.R.M., Multi-objective energy efficient virtual machines allocation at the cloud data center, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing12(1) (2019), 158–171.
14.
FerraraP. and BianchiT., Image forgery localization via fine-grained analysis of CFA artifacts, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security7(5) (2012), 1566–1577.
15.
RathoreP., BezdekJ.C., ErfaniS.M., et al., Ensemble fuzzy clustering using cumulative aggregation on random projections, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems26(3) (2018), 1510–1524.
16.
WangQ., HuiF.T., WangX., et al., Research on early warning and monitoring algorithm of financial crisis based on fuzzy cognitive map, Cluster Computing(2) (2018), 1–9.
17.
MoulikS., MisraS. and GauravA., Cost-effective mapping between wireless body area networks and cloud service providers based on multi-stage bargaining, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing16(6) (2017), 1573–1586.
18.
PradhanS. and PatraD., RMI based non-rigid image registration using BF-QPSO optimization and P-spline, International Journal of Electronics and Communications69(3) (2015), 609–621.
19.
PlataS.A. and SáezS.B., After notes on Chebyshev’s iterative method, Applied Mathematics & Nonlinear Sciences2(3) (2017), 1–12.
20.
LyuS.W., PanX.Y. and ZhangX., Exposing region splicing forgeries with blind local noise estimation, International Journal of Computer Vision110(2) (2014), 202–221.
21.
HaiT., ZhangL., LiuX.Y. and ZhangX.G., Image enlargement based on improved complex diffusion adaptivly coupled nonlocal transform domain model, Journal of Computer Applications38(4) (2018), 1151–1156.
22.
LongT.F. and JiaoW.L., Automatic line segment registration using Gaussian mixture model and expectation-maximization algorithm, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing7(5) (2014), 1688–1699.
23.
ArmantV., CauwerM.D., BrownK.N., et al., Semi-online task assignment policies for workload consolidation in cloud computing systems, Future Generation Computer Systems82 (2018), 98–107.
24.
GaoW. and WangW., A tight neighborhood union condition on fractional (g, f, n’, m)-critical deleted graphs, Colloquium Mathematicum149(2) (2017), 291–298.
25.
GaoW., ZhuL., GuoY. and WangK., Ontology learning algorithm for similarity measuring and ontology mapping using linear programming, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33(5) (2017), 3153–3163.
26.
XiangW., ZhangL., ChenY.H. and JiQ.M., Single image super resolution combining with structural self-similarity and convolution networks, Journal of Computer Applications38(3) (2018), 854–858.
27.
YanW. and Jing-LiF., Noether’s theorems of variable mass systems on time scales, Applied Mathematics & Nonlinear Sciences3(1) (2018), 229–240.
28.
WuX., YuN.H. and ZhangW.M., An improved multi-keyword fuzzy search scheme based on BloomFilter over encrypted text, Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision34(1) (2019), 97–104.
29.
DuanX.D., Research on abnormal data detection method of web browser in cloud computing environment, Cluster Computing22(2) (2019), 1–10.
30.
ShiY.L., ZhangX.J. and ZhangM.L., Design and analysis of an active-passive variable stiffness flexible joint, Journal of Mechanical Engineering54(3) (2018), 55–62.
31.
LiY.N., YuY., MinG.Y., et al., Fuzzy identity-based data integrity auditing for reliable cloud storage systems, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing16(1) (2019), 72–83.
