In a paper by Wang and Elhag [Ying-Ming Wang and Taha M.S. Elhag, Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems with Applications 31 (2006) 309-319], a fuzzy TOPSIS method on alpha level sets was introduced and a nonlinear programming solution procedure was presented. It is found that in the case that the fuzzy decision matrix is of the same dimension and needs no normalization, a pair of nonlinear programming models is incorrect for computing the relative closeness provided by the above paper. In this paper we present a correct pair of nonlinear programming models in the case of the same dimension and justify it from the viewpoint of monotonic function. An illustrated example for selecting the best supplier of metallic components used in a variety of transmission cables has been examined using the proposed programming models to fuzzy TOPSIS method and demonstrated its superiorities, rationalities.
HwangC. and YoonK., Multiple attribut decision making: Methods and applications, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1981.
2.
TriantaphyllouE. and LinC.-T., Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning14(4) (1996), 281–310.
3.
ChenC.-T., Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114(1) (2000), 1–9.
4.
TsaurS.-H., ChangT.-Y. and YenC.-H., The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM, Tourism Management23(2) (2002), 107–115.
5.
ChuT., Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems10(6) (2002), 687–701.
6.
ChuT., Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology20(11) (2002), 859–864.
7.
ChuT. and LinY., A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology21(4) (2003), 284–290.
8.
ChenM.-F. and TzengG.-H., Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country, Mathematical and Computer Modelling40(13) (2004), 1473–1490.
9.
ChenC.-T., LinC.-T. and HuangS.-F., A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Economics102(2) (2006), 289–301.
10.
JahanshahlooG.R., LotfiF.H. and IzadikhahM., Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data, Applied Mathematics and Computation181(2) (2006), 1544–1551.
11.
WangY.-M. and ElhagT.M.S., Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment, Expert Systems With Applications31(2) (2006), 309–319.
12.
KahramanC., BuyukozkanG. and AtesN.Y., A two phase multiattribute decision-making approach for new product introduction, Information Sciences177(7) (2007), 1567–1582.
13.
RoghanianE., RahimiJ. and AnsariA., Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS, Applied Mathematical Modelling34(12) (2010), 3754–3766.
14.
TorfiF., FarahaniR.Z. and RezapourS., Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives, Applied Soft Computing10(2) (2010), 520–528.
15.
Sadi-NezhadS. and DamghaniK.K., Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance, Applied Soft Computing10(4) (2010), 1028–1039.
16.
BaykasogluA., KaplanogluV., DurmusogluZ.D.U. and SahinC., Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection, Expert Systems With Applications40(3, SI) (2013), 899–907.
17.
YeF. and LiY., An extended TOPSIS model based on the Possibility theory under fuzzy environment, Knowledge-Based Systems67 (2014), 263–269.
18.
ToosiS.L.R. and SamaniJ.M.V., A new integrated MADM technique combined with ANP, FTOPSIS and fuzzy Max-Min set method for evaluating water transfer projects, Water Resources Management28(12) (2014), 4257–4272.
19.
Garg VisheshN. and MajiS., Fuzzy TOPSIS approach in selection of optimal noise barrier for traffic noise abatement, Archives of Acoustics40(4) (2015), 453–467.
20.
BaykasogluA. and GolcukI., Development of a novel multipleattribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS, Information Sciences301 (2015), 75–98.
21.
PeiZ., A note on the TOPSIS method in MADM problems with linguistic evaluations, Applied Soft Computing36 (2015), 24–35.
22.
MittalK., TewariP.C., KhandujaD. and KaushikP., Application of fuzzy TOPSIS MADM approach in ranking & underlining the problems of plywood industry in India, Cogent Engineering3(1) (2016), 1–11.
23.
OzkirV.C. and DemirelT., An effective extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method for hierarchically structured group decision making problems, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing26(3–5) (2016), 295–314.
24.
MayyasA., OmarM.A. and HayajnehM.T., Eco-material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering9(5) (2016), 292–304.
25.
GhorabaeeM.K., AmiriM., ZavadskasE.K. and AntuchevicieneJ., Supplier evaluation and selection in fuzzy environments: A review of MADM approaches, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja30(1) (2017), 1073–1118.
26.
SharmaP. and SinghalS., Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology88(5–8) (2017), 1485–1493.
27.
Hatami-MarbiniA. and KangiF., An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to tehran stock exchange, Applied Soft Computing52 (2017), 1084–1097.
28.
IzadikhahM., SaeidifarA. and RoostaeeR., Extending TOPSIS in fuzzy environment by using the nearest weighted interval approximation of fuzzy numbers, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2725–2736.
29.
TadicD., GumusA.T., ArsovskiS., AleksicA. and StefanovicM., An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems25 (2013), 547–556.
30.
TadicD., StefanovicM. and AleksicA., The evaluation and ranking of medical device suppliers by using fuzzy TOPSIS methodology, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems27 (2014), 2091–2101.
31.
WuW.-Y., LinC., KungJ.-Y. and LinC.-T., A new fuzzy TOPSIS for fuzzy MADM problems under group decisions, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems18 (2007), 109–115.
32.
Aliakbari NouriF.,
Khalili EsboueiS. and AntuchevicieneJ., A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for technology selection, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26 (2015), 369–388.
33.
SianakiO.A. and MasoumM.A., A multi-agent intelligent decision making support system for home energy management in smart grid: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems9 (2013), 181–195.
34.
KhandanM., KoohpaeiA., NiliM. and FarjamiY., Occupational musculoskeletal disorders management using fuzzy TOPSIS assessment of repetitive tasks (ART), Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems56 (2017), 267–276.
35.
BhattacharjeeP., DebnathA., ChakrabortyS. and MandalU.K., Selection of optimal aluminum alloy using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems32 (2017), 871–876.
36.
Nazari-ShirkouhiS., Miri-NargesiS. and AnsarinejadA., A fuzzy decision making methodology based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS with a case study for information systems outsourcing decisions, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems32 (2017), 3921–3943.
37.
TolgaA.C., Fuzzy multicriteria R&D project selection with a real options valuation model, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems19 (2008), 359–371.
38.
TaylanO., ZytoonM.A., MorfeqA., Al-HmouzR. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Workplace assessment by fuzzy decision tree and TOPSIS methodologies to manage the occupational safety and health performance, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33 (2017), 1209–1224.
39.
LiX., ChenK., RuanJ. and ShiC., A fuzzy topsis for assessing higher vocational education development levels in uncertainty environments, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems31 (2016), 3083–3093.
40.
SultanaI., AhmedI. and AzeemA., An integrated approach for multiple criteria supplier selection combining fuzzy Delphi, fuzzy AHP & fuzzy TOPSIS, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems29 (2015), 1273–1287.
41.
ZimmermannH., Fuzzy set theory and its applications, 3rd Edition, SpringerNetherlands, Dordrecht, 1996.
42.
Lima JuniorF.R.,
OsiroL. and CarpinettiL.C.R., A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing21 (2014), 194–209.
43.
SchrageL., Optimization Modeling with LINGO, no. ISBN 1-893355-00-4, LINDO Systems Inc, Chicago, 2015.
44.
FishburnP.C., Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: Application to priorities and assignments, Operations Research15(3) (1967), 537–542.
45.
TriantaphyllouE., Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; Boston, Mass, Vol. 44, 2000.
46.
ZhaoX., LinR. and WeiG., Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications41(4) (2014), 1086–1094.
47.
ZhaoX., LiQ. and WeiG., Some prioritized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26(4) (2014), 1619–1630.
48.
ZhaoX., LiQ. and WeiG., Model for multiple attribute decision making based on the Einstein correlated information fusion with hesitant fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 3057–3064.
49.
ZhaoX. and WeiG., Some intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Knowledge-Based Systems37 (2013), 472–479.
50.
WangH., ZhaoX. and WeiG., Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26(5) (2014), 2281–2290.
51.
WeiG., Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33 (2017), 713–724.
52.
WeiG., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Hesitant bipolar fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33 (2017), 1119–1128.
53.
LuM., WeiG., AlsaadiF.E., HayatT. and AlsaediA., Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems33 (2017), 1197–1207.
54.
GuhY., HonC. and LeeE., Fuzzy weighted average: The linear programming approach via Charnes and Cooper’s rule, Fuzzy Sets and Systems117(1) (2001), 157–160.
55.
WuD. and MendelJ.M., Aggregation using the linguistic weighted average and interval type-2 fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems15(6) (2007), 1145–1161.
56.
LiuF. and MendelJ.M., Aggregation using the fuzzy weighted average as computed by the Karnik-Mendel algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems16(1) (2008), 1–12.
57.
GuhY.-Y., PoR.-W. and LeeE.S., The fuzzy weighted average within a generalized means function, Computers and Mathematics With Applications55(12) (2008), 2699–2706.
58.
HuH.-Z., GaoM.-J. and ZhangH., A new algorithm for computing the fuzzy weighted average, IEICE Electronics Express7(19) (2010), 1423–1428.
59.
PavlackaO., Modeling uncertain variables of the weighted average operation by fuzzy vectors, Information Sciences181(22) (2011), 4969–4992.
60.
LiuX., MendelJ.M. and WuD., Analytical solution methods for the fuzzy weighted average, Information Sciences187 (2012), 151–170.
