Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Establishing an ecological responsibility system for resource-oriented enterprises aims to further encourage them to assume ecological responsibility. However, Chinese resource-oriented enterprises exhibit unsatisfactory ecological responsibility performance because they cannot ensure the smooth implementation of the ecological responsibility system. With considerations of the characteristics and detailed contents of ecological responsibility, an evaluation index system was established for resource-oriented enterprises, and their ecological responsibility performances were assessed using the intuitionistic fuzzy set–Technique for Order-Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution method. Challenges of resource-oriented enterprises in ecological responsibility were recognized from the assessment results. Based on the findings, several policy suggestions were proposed to ensure ecological responsibility performance among resource-oriented enterprises.

Keywords

Resource-oriented enterprises ecological responsibility of enterprises effectiveness evaluation intuitionistic fuzzy set–TOPSIS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wang

, Wang

and Zhao

L.Y.

, The Research on the Environmental Performance Evaluation Index System of the Iron and Steel Enterprises: Based on the Ecological Civilization Perspective, Ecological Economy10 (2016), 46–50.

Liu

, Liu

and Wang

, et al., Influencing Factors of Central Enterprise Fulfilling Environmental Responsibility, Statistics & Decision16 (2017), 178–182.

Abson

D.J.

, Fischer

and Leventon

, et al., Leverage points for sustainability transformation, Ambio1 (2007), 30–39.

Holling

C.S.

, Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems, Ecosystems5 (2001), 390–405.

Cai

Y.C.

and Yue

J.J.

, Evaluation of Corporate Environmental Responsibility from the Perspective of Internal Control, Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Social Science Edition)5 (2016), 17–19.

Bouska

K.L.

, Houser

J.N.

and De Jager

N.R.

, et al., Applying concepts of general resilience to large river ecosystems: A case study from the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers, Ecological Indicators (2019), 1094–1110.

Bai

X.M.

, Surveyer

and Elmqvist

, et al., Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (2016), 69–78.

Cloutier

, Berejnoi

and Russell

, et al., Toward a holistic sustainable and happy neighborhood development assessment tool: Acritical reviewof relevant literature, Ecological Indicators (2018), 139–149.

Feleki

, Vlachokostas

and Moussiopoulos

, Characterization of sustainability in urban areas: An analysis of assessment tools with emphasis on European cities, Sustainable Cities and Society (2018), 563–577.

10.

Innes

J.E.

and Booher

D.E.

, Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence, Planning Theory & Practice2 (2000), 173–186.

11.

Mendoza

A.M.E.R.

, Fabela

J.R.C.

and Amezquita-Brooks

L.A.

, et al., Parameter identification using fuzzy neurons: Application to drones and induction motors, Dyna93 (2018), 75–81.

Effectiveness evaluation of the ecological responsibility of resource-oriented enterprises based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets–TOPSIS

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References