Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

There has an important modification of the trademark infringement compensation system in China’s trademark law (2013). Yet through the big data retrieval and analysis software like Citespace, the study found that such difficult problems as generalization of statutory compensation, being difficult to determine the base of punitive damage, lower average compensation in trademark infringement case still exist. Simultaneously, researching on the evaluation of the compensation system for trademark infringement is not completely. This study has constructed the influence index of calculating the statutory compensation amount for trademark infringement through analyzed the judgment on trademark infringement cases in China in the past decade and previous research. Based on these indexes, researchers used fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to analyze the effective judgment of trademark infringement compensation case of Beijing Intellectual Property Court in 2018. Results point that the Court makes better use of statutory compensation in the trademark infringement case.

Keywords

FAHP intellectual property trademark infringement statutory compensation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Phillips

T.J.

, The punitive damage class action: solution to the problem of multiple punishment, University of Illinois Law Review1 (1984), 153–174.

Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Micro electronics Inc.246 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir, 2001).

Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. 709 F.3D 1365 (Fed. Cir, 2013).

Cerri

, Ferri

, Giorgi

, Retrieval of trademark images by means of size functions, Graphical Models68 (2006), 451–471.

Opderbeck

D.W.

, Patent damages reform and the shape of patent law, Boston University Law Review89 (2009), 127–188.

Dan

, Lemley

, Policy in patent law, L. Review89 (2003), 1575.

Adams

W.A.

, Intellectual property infringement in global networks: The implications of protection ahead of the curve, International Journal of Law & Information Technology10 (2002), 71–131.

Fan

, Compensation for non-pecuniary damage of trademark infringement in Taiwan, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society100 (2018), 49–68.

Beebe

, An empirical study of the multifactor tests for trademark infringement, California Law Review94 (2006), 1581–1654.

10.

Patel

, The IP of ipas: look into trademark infringement in the craft beer industry, Journal of Intellectual Property Law26 (2019), 249–274.

11.

Saaty

T.L.

, Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research145 (2003), 85–91.

12.

Liu

K.C.

, Annotated Leading Trademark Cases in Major Asian Jurisdictions, ed., London, 2020, pp. 88–107.

13.

Elizabeth

, Aldis

, The BK-mediated FAHP is modulated by learning a hippocampus-dependent task, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105 (2008), 15154–15159.

14.

, Zhu

, Gao

, CPS information security risk evaluation based on blockchain and big data, Tehnički vjesnik25 (2018), 1843–1850.

15.

Ravangard

, Mehrabian

, A model for the development of hospital beds using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (Fuzzy AHP), Iran J Public Health46 (2017), 1555–1562.

16.

Schechter

F.I.

, Rational basis of trademark protection, The Harvard Law Review40 (1927), 813–833.

17.

Ellis

, Fairness and efficiency in the law of punitive damages, Southern California Law Review56 (1982), 1–78.

A model for evaluating the influence factors in trademark infringement based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References