The concept of the Base/Bottom of the pyramid (BoP), since its first use in the early 2000 s, has been used by researchers and practitioners alike. The past 16 years has witnessed a significant increase in output of published research on the subject. This study aims to analyze the main contributions in this field, using a bibliometric approach. It considers key bibliometric indicators, such as leading authors, journals, institutions, sources, countries, and the most common keywords. A graphical visualization in bibliometric maps has also been developed, using the VOSviewer software. As expected, the results indicate a sharp increase in BoP research over the last 5 years. The most influential research is from the USA, although there has been a considerable wave of production from the global south. The results may be of interest for those hoping to gain an overview of the current state of BoP research.
Albort-MorantG. and Ribeiro-SorianoD., A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators, Journal of Business Research69(5) (2016), 1775–1779.
2.
Blažun VošnerH., BobekS., Sternad ZabukovšekS. and KokolP., Openness and information technology: A bibliometric analysis of literature production, Kybernetes46(5) (2017), 750–766.
3.
BroadusR.N., Toward a definition of “bibliometrics,”, Scientometrics12(5– 6) (1987), 373–379.
4.
CancinoC.,
MerigoJ.M.,
CoronadoF., A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge2 (2017) 106–124.
5.
CancinoC., MerigóJ.M., CoronadoF., DessoukyY. and DessoukyM., Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A bibliometric analysis, Computers and Industrial Engineering113 (2017), 614–629.
6.
Casado CañequeF., Lessons learned: Moving the inclusive business agenda forward. In F. Casado Cañeque and S.L. Hart (Eds.), Base of the Pyramid 3.0 (pp. 5–10). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, 2015.
7.
Casado CañequeF. and HartS.L., (Eds.). Base of the Pyramid 3.0 (1st ed.). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing, (2015).
8.
Castillo-VergaraM., Alvarez-MarinA. and Placencio-HidalgoD., A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics, Journal of Business Research 85 (2018), 1–9.
9.
CullenJ.G., Educating business students about sustainability: A bibliometric review of current trends and research needs, Journal of Business Ethics145(2) (2017), 429–439.
10.
DzikowskiP., A bibliometric analysis of born global firms, Journal of Business Research85 (2018), 281–294.
11.
FerreiraF.A.F., Mapping the field of arts-based management: Bibliographic coupling and co-citation analyses, Journal of Business Research85 (2018), 348–357.
12.
HahnR. and GoldS., Resources and governance in “base of the pyramid”-partnerships: Assessing collaborations between businesses and non-business actors, Journal of Business Research67(7) (2014), 1321–1333.
13.
HallJ., MatosS.V. and MartinM.J.C., Innovation pathways at the Base of the Pyramid: Establishing technological legitimacy through social attributes, Technovation34(5– 6) (2014), 284–294.
14.
HammondA.L., KramerW.J., KatzR.S. and TranJ.T., The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington DC: World Bank, 2007.
15.
HartS.L. and ChristensenC.M., The great leap: Driving innovation from the base of the pyramid, MIT Sloan Management Review44(1) (2002), 51–56.
16.
HirschJ.E., An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America102(46) (2005), 16569–16572.
17.
KarnaniA., The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the Pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty, California Management Review49(4) (2007), 90–111.
18.
KesslerM.M., Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation14(1) (1963), 10–25.
19.
KolkA., Rivera-SantosM. and RufínC., Reviewing a Decade of Research on the “Base/Bottom of the Pyramid” (BOP) Concept, Business and Society53(3) (2014), 338–377.
20.
KücherA. and Feldbauer-DurstmüllerB., Organizational failure and decline– A bibliometric study of the scientific frontend, Journal of Business Research98 (2018), 503–516.
21.
LandströmH., HarirchiG. and ÅströmF., Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base, Research Policy41(7) (2012), 1154–1181.
22.
LeliveldA. and KnorringaP., Frugal Innovation and Development Research, The European Journal of Development Research30(1) (2018), 1–16.
23.
LondonT., AnupindiR. and ShethS., Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers, Journal of Business Research63(6) (2010), 582–594.
24.
LondonT. and HartS.L., Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: Beyond the transnational model, Journal of International Business Studies35(5) (2004), 350–370.
25.
Martínez-LópezF.J., MerigóJ.M., Valenzuela-FernándezL. and NicolásC., Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: A bibliometric analysis, European Journal of Marketing52(1/2) (2018), 439–468.
26.
MerigóJ.M., Gil-LafuenteA.M. and YagerR.R., An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators, Applied Soft Computing Journal27 (2015), 420–433.
27.
MerigóJ.M., Mas-TurA., Roig-TiernoN. and Ribeiro-SorianoD., A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014, Journal of Business Research68(12) (2015), 2645–2653.
28.
MerigóJ.M., RocafortA. and Aznar-AlarcónJ.P., Bibliometric Overview of Business & Economics Research, Journal of Business Economics and Management17(3) (2016), 397–413.
29.
MoedH.F., New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis57(1) (2009), 13–18.
30.
Pineda-EscobarM.A., Business, Sustainability, and Base of the Pyramid. In Principles and Strategies to Balance Ethical, Social and Environmental Concerns with Corporate Requirements (Vol. 12, pp. 67–91). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2013.
31.
Pineda-EscobarM.A. and Garzon CuervoF.G., Improving Post-2015 Development Cooperation through Donor Support for Inclusive Business. In Advances in Sustainability and Environmental Justice (pp. 141–163). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, (2016).
32.
PodsakoffP.M., MacKenzieS.B., PodsakoffN.P. and BachrachD.G., Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of University and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century, Journal of Management34(4) (2008), 641–720.
33.
PrahaladC.K., The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, Wharton School Pub, 2004.
34.
PrahaladC.K., Bottom of the Pyramid as a Source of Breakthrough Innovations, Journal of Production Innovation Management29(1) (2012), 6–12.
35.
PrahaladC.K. and HammondA., Serving the world’s poor, profitably, Harvard Business Review80(9) (2002), 48–57.
36.
PrahaladC.K. and HartS.L., The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid, Strategy+business26(first quarter) (2002), 1–13.
37.
Rey-MartíA., Ribeiro-SorianoD. and Palacios-MarquésD., A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Research69(5) (2016), 1651–1655.
38.
SeelosC. and MairJ., Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view executive overview, Academy of Management Perspectives21(4) (2007), 49–63.
39.
SmallH., Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science24(4) (1973), 265–269.
40.
Tur-PorcarA., Mas-TurA., MerigóJ.M., Roig-TiernoN. and WattJ., A bibliometric history of the journal of psychology between 1936 and 2015, The Journal of Psychology152(4) (2018), 199–225.
41.
ValenzuelaL.M., MerigóJ.M., JohnstonW.J., NicolasC. and JaramilloJ.F., Thirty years of the Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing: A bibliometric analysis, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing32(1) (2017), 1–17.
42.
van EckN.J. and WaltmanL., Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping, Scientometrics84(2) (2010), 523–538.
43.
van EckN.J. and WaltmanL., Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2014).
44.
VaradarajanR., Toward sustainability: Public policy, global social innovations for base-of-the-pyramid markets, and demarketing for a better world, Journal of International Marketing22(2) (2014), 1–20.
45.
WebbJ.W., KistruckG.M., IrelandR.D. and KetchenD.J.Jr., , The entrepreneurship process in base of the pyramid markets: The case of multinational enterprise/nongovernment organization alliances, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34(3) (2010), 555–581.
