This research aims to explore the impact of the principal worth-creating initiatives in hybrid business management models. The methodology applied is the theory of the forgotten effects, which assesses some direct and indirect relationships to determine causes and effects in the value-creation in non-profit organizations. The main contribution of this study shows that the non-foreseen causes, at least in the first instance, affect remarkably to the generation of value in non-profit organizations. A case study has also been provided to solve decision making problems under partial information.
AndréK. and PacheA., A From Caring Entrepreneur to Caring Enterprises: Addressing the Ethical Challenge of Scaling up Social Enterprises, Journal of Business Ethics133 (2016), 659–675.
2.
AwioG., NorthcottD. and LawrenceS., Social capital and accountability in grass-roots NGOs. The case of the Uganda community-led HIV/AIDS initiative, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal24(1) (2011), 63–92.
3.
BhattacharyaC. and SenS., Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Organizations, Journal of Marketing67(2) (2003), 76–88.
4.
BareaJ., Concepto y agentes de la economía social, CIRIEC ESPAÑA, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa8 (1990), 109–117.
5.
Blanco-MesaF., MerigoJ.M. and Gil-LafuenteA.M., Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems32(3) (2017), 2033–2050.
6.
BorzagaC., Defourny, The emergence of social enterprise, Ed. Routledge, London, 2001.
7.
CapronM. and GrayR., Experimenting with assessing corporate responsibility in France: An exploratory note on an initiative by social economy firms, The European Accounting Review9(1) (2000), 99–109.
8.
ChavesR. and MonzónJ.L., Economía social y sector no lucrativo: Actualidad científica y perspectivas, CIRIEC-ESPAÑA, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa37 (2011), 7–33.
9.
ChenhallR.H., HallM. and SmithD., D, Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-governmental organization, Accounting, Organizations and Society35 (2010), 737–756.
10.
ChildC., Tip of the Iceberg: Nonprofit Underpinnings of For-Profit Social Enterprise, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly45(2) (2016), 217–237.
11.
DemoustierD., La economía social: Una economía privada, colectiva y no lucrativa, activa en la oferta de servicios, en el mercado de trabajo y en el mercado de capitales, CIRIEC ESPAÑA, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa33 (1999), 29–41.
12.
DesrocheH., Pour un traité d’économie sociale, CIEM, Paris, 1983.
13.
DeyC., Social Accounting at Traidcraft plc. A struggle with the meaning of fair trade, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal20(3) (2007), 423–445.
14.
Gil-LafuenteA.M. and AnselínE., Fuzzy logic in the strategic analysis: Impact of the external factors over business, Journal of Business Innovation and Research3 (2009), 515–534.
15.
Gil-LafuenteA.M. and BarcellosL., de Paula, Una aplicación de la metodología de los efectos olvidados: Los factores que contribuyen al crecimiento sostenible de la empresa, Cuadernos del Cimbage12 (2010), 23–52.
16.
Gil-LafuenteA.M., Gil AlujaJ., Fuzzylog. Patente, 2009.
17.
Gil-LafuenteA.M. and Luis-BassaC., Identificación de los atributos contemplados por los clientes en una estrategia CRM utilizando el modelo de efectos olvidados, Cuadernos del Cimbage13 (2011), 107–127.
18.
GrayR., BebbingtonJ. and CollinsonD., NGOs, civil society and accountability: Making people accountable to capital, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal19(3) (2006), 405–427.
19.
GueslinA., L’invention de l’économie sociale. Economica, París, 1987.
20.
HorrachP. and SocíasA., La actitud de las empresas de economía solidaria frente a la divulgación de información sobre sostenibilidad desde el prisma de la teoría de los stakeholders, Revista Española de Contabilidad14(1) (2011), 267–297.
21.
KaufmannA. and GilJ., Models per a la investigació d’efectes oblidats. Ed. Milladoiro, D. L. Vigo, 1988.
22.
KerlinJ.A., Defining Social Enterprise Across Different Contexts: A Conceptual Framework Based on Institutional Factors, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly42(1) (2013), 8–108.
23.
KimN., SungY. and LeeM., Consumer Evaluations of Social Alliances: The Effects of Perceived Fit Between Organizations and Non-Profit Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics109(2) (2012), 163–174.
24.
LuoX. and BhattacharyaC., Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value, Journal of Marketing70(4) (2006), 1–18.
25.
MaierF., MeyerM. and SteinbereithnerM., Nonprofit Organizations Becoming Business-Like, A systematic Review, Nonporfit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly45(1) (2016), 5–22.
26.
MartorellO. and MuletC., The franchise contract in hotel chains: A study of hotel chain growth and market concentrations, Tourism Economics16(3) (2010), 493–516.
27.
MartorellO., Gil-LafuenteA.M., SociasA. and MuletC., Non-equity agreements in the hospitality industry. Analysis from the perspective of the forgotten effects, Soft Computing in Management and Business Economics 2, 269-285, Springer, 2012.
28.
MithasS., KrishnanM. and FornellC., Why Do Consumer Relationships Management Applications Affect Customer Satisfaction?, Journal of Marketing69(4) (2005), 201–209.
29.
Mulet-FortezaC., HorrachP., SociasA. and MerigóJ.M., The forgotten effects: An application in the social ecobony of companies of the Balearic Islands, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research52(3) (2018), 147–160.
30.
NyssensM., Social Enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, Routledge, Londres, 2006.
31.
PacheA.C., Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics, Academy of Management Journal56(4) (2013), 972–1001.
32.
SalinasF. and RubioM.J., Tendencias en la evolución de las organizaciones no lucrativas hacia la empresa social, CIRIEC ESPAÑA, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa37 (2001), 79–116.
33.
SalamonL.M. and AnheierH.K., Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis, Institute for Policy Studies, The Johns Hopkins University, 1997.
34.
SangleS., Critical Success Factors for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Public Sector Perspective, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management17 (2010), 205–214.
35.
SenS. and BhattacharyaC., Does Doing Good Always lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research38(2) (2001), 225–244.
36.
UnermanJ., O’DwyerB. and OnB., James Bond and the importante of NGO accountability, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal19(3) (2006a), 305–318.
37.
UnermanJ. and O’DwyerB., Theorinsing accountability for NGO advocacy, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal19(3) (2006b), 349–376.
38.
VienneyO., Concepts et champs de l’economie social, Revue des Études Cooperatives, 9, Paris, 1983.
39.
YamanH. and GurelE., Ethical Ideologies of Tourism Marketers, Annals of Tourism Research33 (2006), 470–489.
40.
YoungD.R., If not for profit, for what? DC Heath, Lexintong, Massachusetts, 1983.
