In a different area of life testing, designing experiments needs higher stress level than normal stress one. Also, the time to failure of experimental units is resulted by one of a fetal risk factors, only. In this paper, we adopted partially step-stress accelerates life-tests (ALTs) model on the Lomax lifetime unites under the two different risk factors with type-I censoring scheme. Under this assumption, we will estimate the Lomax parameters as well as accelerated factor by maximum likelihood method, point and asymptotic confidence intervals. Also, the Bayesian MCMC approach is used in obtaining point and credible interval estimations. Theoretical results are discussed and assessed through data analysis and Monte Carlo simulation study. comments.
NelsonW., Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test, Plans and Data Analyses, Wiley, New York (1990).
2.
BagdanaviciusV.B., NikulinM., Accelerated life models: Modeling and statistical analysisBoca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall CRC Pres (2002).
3.
BalakrishnanN., A synthesis of exact inferential results for exponential step-stress models and associated optimal accelerated life-tests, Metrika69 (2009), 351.
4.
Mohie El-DinM.M.,
AmeinM.M.,
Abd El-RaheemA.M.,
El-AttarH.E. and
HafezE.H., Estimation of the coefficient of variation for lindley distribution based on progressive first failure censored data, J. Stat. Appl. Prob.8 (2019), 83–90.
5.
SabryM.A., MuhammedH.Z., NabihA. and ShaabanM., Parameter estimation for the power generalized weibull distribution based on one- and two-stage ranked set sampling designs, J. Stat. Appl. Prob.8 (2019), 113–128.
6.
GuanQ. and TangY., Optimal step-stress test under Type-I censoring for multivariate exponential distribution, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference142 (2012), 1908–1923.
7.
BalakrishnanN.Z., ZhangL. and XieQ., Inference for a simple step-stress model with Type-I censoring and lognormally distributed lifetimes, Communication in Statistics – Theory and Methods38 (2009), 1690–1709.
8.
LinC.T. and ChouC.C., Statistical inference for a lognormal step-stress model with Type-I censoring, IEEE Transactions on Reliability61 (2012), 361–377.
9.
HanD. and KunduD., “Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the generalized exponential distribution under type-I censoring,”IEEE Transactions on Reliability64 (2015), 31–43.
10.
BalakrishnanN. and HanD., Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under Type-II censoring, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference138 (2008), 4172–4186.
11.
HanD. and RamakrishnaN., Inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the exponential distribution under time constraint, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis54 (2010), 2066–2081.
12.
YusufA. and QureshiS., A five parameter statistical distribution with application to real data, J. Stat. Appl. Prob.8 (2019), 11–26.
13.
KumarD., SinghU., SinghS.K. and ChaurasiaP.K., A new lifetime distribution: Some of its statistical properties and application, J. Stat. Appl. Prob.7 (2018), 413–422.
14.
ZhangC., ShiY. and WuM., Statistical inference for competing risks model in step-stress partially acceleratedlife tests with progressively Type-I hybrid censored Weibull life data, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics257 (2016), 65–74.
15.
WuM., ShiY. and SunY., Inference for accelerated competing failure models from Weibull distribution under Type-I progressive hybrid censoring, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics263 (2014), 423–431.
16.
HanD., Estimation in step-stress life tests with complementary risks from the exponentiated exponential distribution under time constraint and its applications to UAV data,”Statistical Methodology23 (2015), 103–122.
17.
CoxD.R., The analysis of exponentially distributed lifetimes with two types of failures,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society21 (1959), 411–421.
18.
CrowderM.J., Classical Competing Risks, Chapman and Hall, London (2001).
19.
BalakrishnanN. and HanD., Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with competing risks for failure from exponential distribution under Type-II censoring, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference138 (2008), 4172–4186.
20.
GangulyA. and KunduD., Analysis of simple step-stress model in presence of competing risks, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation86 (2016), 1989–2006.
21.
Hanaa Abu-ZinadahH. and
Sayed-AhmedNeveen, Competing risks model with partially step-stress accelerate life tests in analyses lifetime Chen data under type-II censoring scheme, Open Phys.17 (2019), 192–199.
22.
ModheshA.A. and Abd-ElmougodG.A., Analysis of progressive first-failure-censoring in the burr XII model for competing risks data, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics4 (2015), 610–618.
23.
AlgarnA., AlmarashiA.M., Abd-ElmougodG.A. and Abo-EleneenZ.A., Partially constant stress accelerate life tests model in analyses lifetime competing risks with a bathtub shape lifetime distribution in presence of Type-I censoring, Transylvanian Review, To appear (2019).
24.
SamantaD., GuptaA. and KunduD., Analysis of Weibull step-stress sodel in presence of competing risk, IEEE Transactions on Reliability64 (2019), 420–438.
25.
LomaxK.S., Business failures: Another example of the analysis of failure data, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.49 (1954), 847–852.
26.
ChahkandiM. and GanjaliM., On some lifetime distributions with decreasing failure rate, Comput. Statist. Data Anal53 (2009), 4433–4440.
27.
ErhardE., CramerA.B. and
Schmiedt, Progressively Type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis55 (2011), 1285–1303.
28.
MetropolisN.,
RosenbluthA.W.,
RosenbluthM.N.,
TellerA.H. and
TellerE., Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines, Journal Chemical Physics21 (1953), 1087–1091.
