The article combines mathematical models to describe the multi-customer air cargo routing problem. Aiming at the coding problems in standard genetic algorithms and the large number of non-feasible solutions after crossover and mutation, this paper proposes a new feasible method–two-generation competition and steady-state genetic operator design. Finally, the model solving method and steps based on improved genetic algorithm are given. The example calculation shows that the method can provide scientific and effective support for the decision of the route selection problem in the air cargo system.
CunbingL.I., XieL. and YangJ., Low carbon-oriented route optimization of tobacco logistics via double-layer genetic algorithm, Tobacco Science & Technology47(2) (2018), 15–18.
2.
BalasubramaniamA., PaulA., HongW.H., Seo H.C. and KimJ., Comparative Analysis of Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Environment in Smart Cities, Sustainability9(7) (2017), 1120.
3.
CuiL.X., Joint optimization of production planning and supplier selection incorporating customer flexibility: An improved genetic approach, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing27(5) (2016), 1017–1035.
4.
XiaoW., HeE., HuY. and AeronauticsS.O., A new method of optimizing bolts layout in connector based on improved genetic algorithm. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 35(3) (2017), 414–421.
5.
BaumgartenP., MalinaR. and LangeA., The impact of hubbing concentration on flight delays within airline networks: An empirical analysis of the us domestic market, Transportation Research Part E66(1) (2014), 103–114.
6.
Kumar SenS. and RathaB.K.Dr., A. Comprehensive Study on Distributed Data Mining and Learning Algorithms, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJIRCCE)5(6), 2017.
7.
MedirattaR., AhluwaliaK. and YeoS.H., State-of-the-art on vibratory finishing in the aviation industry: An industrial and academic perspective, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology85(1-4) (2016), 415–429.
8.
PaulA., DanielA., AhmadA. and RhoS., Cooperative cognitive intelligence for internet of vehicles, IEEE Systems Journal11(3) (2017), 1249–1258.
9.
CenS. and ZhuangJ., Two-stage security screening strategies in the face of strategic applicants, congestions and screening errors, Annals of Operations Research258(2) (2017), 237–262.
10.
SudhakarAncy, RajalekshmyK.D., and Prince Abraham, An Efficient. Fuzzy Based Approach for Hepatitis Detection, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJIRCCE)5(5), 2017.
11.
ZhenZ., ZhangJ., SunY. and TianH., Fault detection and diagnosis method for batch process based on elm-based fault feature phase identification, Neural Computing & Applications27(1) (2016), 167–173.
12.
TrautrimsA., DefeeC. and FarrisT., Preparing business students for workplace reality – using global virtual teams in logistics and scm education, International Journal of Logistics Management27(3) (2016), 886–907.
13.
ShirkandeS., MadhukarDr. and LengareJ., A Survey on Various Underwater Image Enhancement Techniques, International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJIRCCE)5(7), 2017.
14.
ShengD., LiZ.C., XiaoY.B. and FuX., Slot auction in an airport network with demand uncertainty, Transportation Research Part E82(1) (2015), 79–100.
15.
DinS., PaulA. and RehmanA., 5G-enabled Hierarchical architecture for software-defined intelligent transportation system, Computer Networks150 (2019), 81–89.
