In this paper we present an extended model of an unsupervised collective, that is a group where each member communicates with others to form opinions, instead of a single supervisor determining the overall collective knowledge. We describe the social influence theories that are the basis of the proposed model, and how they translate to a multi-agent model of the collective. We define two measures of social influence that are formalizations of concepts presented in sociological research. We perform a simulation experiment, where we observe the behavior of the collective in relation to those measures. Finally, we present a road-map of future improvements possible in the model, working towards a real world test of its feasibility.
Abed-alguniB.H., ChalupS.K., HenskensF.A. and PaulD.J., A multi-agent cooperative reinforcement learning model using a hierarchy of consultants, tutors and workers, in: Vietnam Journal of Computer Science2(4) (2015), 213–226, Springer.
2.
BarthelemyJ.P. and JanowitzM.F., A formal theory of consensus, in: Siam Journal of Discrete Mathematics4 (1991), 305–322.
3.
BellifemineF., AgostinoP. and GiovanniR., JADEâĂŞA FIPA-compliant agent framework, Proceedings of PAAM99 (1999), 97–108.
4.
BhatS.P. and BernsteinD.S., Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems, in: Siam J Control Optim38(3) (2000), 751–766.
5.
BrauerM., JuddC.M., GlinerM.D., The Effects of Repeated Expressions on Attitude Polarization During Group Discussions, in Small Groups, edited by
LevineJ.M.,
MorelandR.L., Psychology Press, 2006, pp. 265–296.
6.
CameronK.A., A practitioner’s guide to persuasion: An overview of 15 selected persuasion theories, models and frameworks, in: Patient Education and Counseling74 (2009), 309–317.
7.
ChaimontreeS., AtkinsonK., CoenenF., Agents and Data Mining Interaction, A multi-agent based approach to clustering: Harnessing the power of agents, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 16–29.
8.
ChenG., LewisF.L. and XieL., Finite-time distributed consensus via binary control protocols, in: Automatica47 (2011), 1962–1968.
9.
CheungC.M.K. and LeeM.K.O., A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks, in: Decision Support Systems49 (2010), 24–30.
10.
van DijkeM. and
PoppeM., Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics, in: European Journal of Social Psychology36 (2006), 537–556.
11.
DuboisD., LiuW., MaJ. and PradeH., The basic principles of uncertain information fusion. An organized review of merging rules in different representation frameworks, in: Information Fusion32 (2016).
12.
GardnerW.L., Garr-SchultzA., Understanding Our Groups, Understanding Ourselves: The Importance of Collective Identity Clarity and Collective Coherence to the Self, in: Self-Concept Clarity, edited by:
Lodi-SmithJ. and DeMarreeK., Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 125–143.
13.
GentzkowM. and KamenicaE., Bayesian persuasion with multiple senders and rich signal spaces, in: Games and Economic Behavior104 (2017), 411–429.
14.
HaleM.T., NedicA. and EgerstedtM., Cloud-Based Centralized/Decentralized Multi-Agent Optimization with Communication Delays, arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.06230, 2015.
15.
HuW., GongZ., UL.H. and
GuoL., Identifying influential user communities on the social network, in: Enterprise Information Systems9(7) (2015), 709–724. DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2013.804586
16.
IscaroG. and NakamitiG., A supervisor agent for urban traffic monitoring, IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), IEEE2013, pp. 167–170.
17.
KelmanH.C., Further Thoughts on the Processes of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization, Social Power and Political Influence, ed.
TedeschiJ.T., New York: Routledge, (2017, reprint 2017), pp. 125–171.
18.
KelmanH.C., Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment, in: Annu Rev Psychol57 (2006), 1–26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190156
19.
LiS., DuaH. and LinX., Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with double-integrator dynamics, in: Automatica47 (2011), 1706–1712.
20.
MaleszkaM., Application of collective knowledge diffusion in a social network environment, Enterprise Information Systems (2018). DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2018.1526325
21.
MaleszkaM., The Increasing Bias of Non-uniform Collectives,
NguyenN.,
PimenidisE.,
KhanZ. and TrawiÅĎskiB., (eds.) Computational Collective Intelligence, ICCCI 2018 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11055. Springer, Cham.
22.
De MontjoyeY.A.,
StopczynskiA.,
ShmueliE.,
PentlandA. and LehmannS., The Strength of the Strongest Ties in Collaborative Problem Solving. Scientific reports 4, Nature Publishing Group2014.
23.
NagataT. and SasakiH., A multi-agent approach to power system restoration, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems17(2) (2002), 457–462. IEEE.
24.
NguyenN.T., Advanced methods for inconsistent knowledge management, Springer, 2007.
25.
PetersonC.K., NewmanA.J., SpallJ.C., Simulation-based examination of the limits of performance for decentralized multiagent surveillance and tracking of undersea targets, SPIE Defense+ Security, International Society for Optics and Photonics (2014), 90910F–90910F.
26.
RenW., BeardR.W. and AtkinsE.M., A Survey of Consensus Problems in Multi-agent Coordination, American Control Conference, 2005 Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE, 2005, pp. 1859–1864.
27.
SongJ., JamousN. and TurowskiK., A dynamic perspective: Local interactions driving the spread of social networks, in: Enterprise Information Systems, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2018.1499133
28.
TseY.K., LohH., DingJ. and ZhangM., An investigation of social media data during a product recall scandal, in: Enterprise Information Systems12(6) (2018), 733–751. DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2018.1455110
29.
YuklG., An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories, in: Leadership Quarterly10(2) (1999), 285–305.
30.
ZhouT., Understanding online community user participation: A social influence perspective, in: Internet Research21(1) (2011), 67–81. DOI 10.1108/10662241111104884
